Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Monster of the deep that now nets £250k an hour

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
29 November 2007
SCOTLAND'S fishing heritage has long been tied to the romantic image of small boats heading out to brave the open sea and harvest its bounty. It is also viewed as an industry in decline and at odds with the ecology of the sea. But in recent years, a new kind of fishing industry has been gradually spreading across the sea lochs around Scotland's coasts.
Figures released yesterday by the newly created Aquaculture Information Bureau (AIB) showed fish farming was worth more than £400 million in 2006. This placed it ahead of fishing - which was worth £370 million - for the first time. Assuming a typical year of 224 working days, and a working day of seven hours, fish farming is netting £255,000 an hour, or £71 every second, for the Scottish economy.

The fish farming business has taken off at an astonishing rate. The first sites started in the 1970s and by 1980 only 9 per cent of the fish consumed came from aquaculture; now it is 43 per cent.

Aquaculture "products", as the industry refers to its shellfish and fish, also represent 50 per cent by value of all Scottish food exports.

In the past year, Scotland exported more than 12 million salmon to 60 countries and it is now the third-largest salmon producer in the world.

According to Ken Hughes, of the Scottish Salmon Producers' Organisation, the success of the industry comes down to Scotland's geographic position.

"The water quality of the country is extremely high," he said. "Also, geographically, you have good, strong sea lochs, which enjoy a bit of protection - the technology for the wild seas isn't there yet - to allow aquaculture cultivation.

"There's been a massive upturn in the consumption of fish. There are two figures in terms of salmon consumption: for smoked salmon, it has increased approximately 37 per cent, while fresh salmon has risen by up to 15 per cent."

The average Scot, though, still eats only a third of a portion of fish a week, well below the recommended two portions, and Mr Hughes acknowledges that "there's a long way to go". However, the fish-farming industry is now making a vital contribution to the rural economy, especially in the western and northern isles, where many communities are sustained by the employment provided - about 1,500 direct jobs, with a further 4,700 downstream.

"The aquaculture industry is at the heart of many communities," Mr Hughes said.

"The people who work in the industry are involved in school boards, volunteer firemen, all aspects of local life."

But while holding such a key place in the Scottish economy, it has not been plain sailing for aquaculture.

Despite strict legislation controlling the industry and a stated need by the European Union to expand the amount of aquaculture production, increasing imports of seafood are placing mounting pressures on the sector, triggering demands for a level "playing field" from producers.

Furthermore, during the past decade, the industry has had to contend with scares over the level of contaminants in farmed salmon - accusations that have been rejected vociferously by the salmon industry - and the issue of parasitic sea lice.

Conservationists have also voiced concern about the impact that the aquaculture industry has had on the environment.

Indeed, one of the biggest issues preventing further expansion is the difficulty of finding sites due to opposition from local communities, normally on the grounds that any new farms will affect the "visual amenity" of the area.

Dawn Purchase, of the Marine Conservation Society, outlined its main concerns: "There is the siting of farms to ensure that there is minimal environmental impact.

"There is also food sustainability. The rise in production has brought increased reliance on wild-capture fisheries, who produce salmon feed by processing certain species of fish, and we want to ensure the long-term sustainability of this source."

She also said that the "genetic dilution" of wild stocks of salmon by farmed salmon which have escaped the cages was a serious concern. "These fish can reduce wild salmon genetic fitness, take their food and displace their eggs," Ms Purchase said. "However, it's fair to say that the industry has improved in recent years and we applaud the moves that have been made. But there's still a way to go."

Her sentiments were echoed by Brian Davidson, the director of the Association of Salmon Fishery Boards, which protects wild stocks of the fish. "Escapes are the main issue for us. There's been a lot of publicity about this, because they can have quite a devastating impact on wild stocks," he said.

"It's something that we are beginning to lose our patience on, but they are trying to beef up their cage infrastructure."

He also said that the issue of sea lice - a potentially lethal infestation that affects farmed salmon and can be passed on to wild stocks by escapees - was being tackled by greater co-operation between those concerned with salmon, both wild and farmed, under agreements brokered by the Scottish Government. But industry efforts aside, Mr Hughes acknowledged that there remains an issue about how the aquaculture industry is perceived by the public, in contrast to the generally positive view of this country's fishing fleet.

"Certainly, efforts have been made to address the concerns about environment and the issues of lice and escapes," he said. "The AIB is here to try and present its story. In the past, the industry has not got its message across and it has got to change perceptions about it, not just to the general public, but to local authorities - who we have to convince about our industry's needs - right up to parliamentarians, who have a say in how it can be changed."

However, with globalisation knocking down trade barriers everywhere, and with EU estimates that per-capita consumption of seafood will grow by 50 per cent by 2030, it seems likely that, whether reluctantly or not, Scotland will embrace one of its newest industries.

• FOR Roger Thwaites, an oyster farmer in Argyll and owner of Shian Fisheries, the aquaculture industry has provided his livelihood for 34 years, having worked in salmon and mussel cultivation before moving into oyster farming in 1996.

"Essentially, the farm is me and my wife, Judy. We've been running it since 1996. We bring the oyster trestles up at low tide, which are submerged the majority of time, decide which ones we want and take them back to the processing centre for grading.

"It can take up to three years for an oyster farm to reach production, depending on the size of the seed. It costs roughly 2p per oyster in their smallest size, and you need to buy 400,000 to 500,000 for what is a small farm, compared with France or Spain where they have farms of 20 million.

"That 500,000 seed will produce 30 tonnes, which sells for about £2,400 a ton, or 20p a shell. We make about £80,000 annually.

"The majority of our production goes to Waitrose supermarkets, though some is bought by Tesco too. The spec that they set down is pretty tight; they want them to be a certain size, have a specific meat content and be specific shape. They also want the quality and health to be of a certain level too, which is only right, and we get tested endlessly.

"It's difficult to expand because it's hard to find new sites. Also there are competing interests for use of the water from leisure, fishing and the local population, which makes it difficult for us too. There is huge potential for this industry in Scotland but there aren't enough young people coming into the industry at the moment. I have two sons, who certainly don't want to be oyster farmers. I keep doing it because I love it."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 November 2007 10:55 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Fish farming industry
 
1

Ted,

29/11/2007 00:15:02

Dawn Purchase is a great name.

2

Inspector Murdoch,

29/11/2007 01:01:33

I Know her cousin ..........Shona Proffit.

3

spiderman,

argyll 29/11/2007 08:42:07

As commonly practised here, fish-farming is a moral and environmental disaster. It should be limited and controlled and, in most cases, terminated.

4

Lianachan,

Highlands 29/11/2007 08:53:29

Farmed salmon is fatty, tasteless rubbish. I applaud its excellent contribution to the economy, but it contributes far less to the dinner table.

5

Boy Wonder,

29/11/2007 09:06:44

#1. & #2. Being fisherfolk, I think there's room for Annette Flung-Faranwide, don't you?

6

Not Toobrite,

29/11/2007 09:18:55

6 Negitve comments from a people that need to wake up! But as Scotland has no unemployment, has very low taxes, has the worlds best health system, the worlds highest pensions, and the youth are renowned through the world as highly train, drug free, and educated in the worlds best education system, who needs the 71 pounds a second that these 4,700 hard working people bring to the economy. 50% of all Scotlands food exports?? Who cares!

7

Tweedmouth,

29/11/2007 10:12:07

The downside of the salmon farming industry is that it will lead to the extinction of wild salmon and sea trout on the West coast. Young salmon have to run the gauntlet of a cloud of billions of sealice in areas near salmon farms as they go to sea. Many do not return.

The major issue however is that of the 150,000 tonnes of sandeels still being caught every year to process as salmon food pellets. Along with hundreds of thousands of tonnes of other fish. In the 1980s the Danes were taking almost a million tonnes of sandeels a year from the North Sea - almost all of which went to make dried fish food. That is why the puffins and guillemot chicks have starved to death almost every year in many colonies. Salmon farming is simply unsustainable since it depends on raping the other wild fish stocks to feed the chemically drenched salmon in their cages.

In North West America it is ILLEGAL to offer farmed salmon for sale in any shop or supermarket. It is ILLEGAL to farm salmon there. This is because they still have five wild species of salmon coming up the rivers of Oregon, Washington, B.C. and Alaska in tens of millions. Wild, clean, delicious fish - and entirely sustainable. The Americans know that if you allow farmed salmon into those areas you will lose the wild stocks. And if the ultimate capitalist power on the planet knows that - how come Scotland doesn't?

8

just chat,

london 29/11/2007 10:30:38

while i accept fish farming helps the economy n not in a small way, who really enjoys farmed salmon, not people you have eaten real wild salmon, as for the safety of farmed salmon we are constantely told is safe to eat,

well yes if we eat what the national average is, they have to use antibiotics to keep infections down they have to artificially feed the fish with God knows what (didn't they fed cows with dead sheep n we got this mad cow desease?)

but did anyone told us the public: people we feed the cows we sell to u as beef with dead sheep why would it be any different now? who can trust them to tell us the truth

i remember when fruit tasted like fruit vegetables was a pleasure to eat taste them now what taste CAN U IMASGINE that tomatos n quecumbers have to be a certaine size? as for the taste what taste today's people eat with their eyes

taste and quality don't come into it i haven't eaten aggs since 1997 when i visited my cousin back home there he had 6 chickens running in his field 11 stremata, n he was feeding them all the left overs from the dinner table wheat n corn try that n see what a real egg tastes like

tomatos n cuecumbers NOT grown with their roots in water with feed running in the water but in the soil under the sun with horse manure as God intented what we eat is NOT real food

i do not believe is human nature for all of us to be prepaired to destroy nature for profit MOST people are NOT like that in my experience but yes there are people like that n one day EVERYBODY WILL REGRET what he majority allowed the minority to do

i remember well what a wonderful taste scotish wild salmon had worth every penny u paid for, i was lucky enough to have had one fresh scotish wild salmon about 15 years ago

what next apples on a conveyor belt? look at the "lives" chickens have to endure in chicken farms

for "chickens" to be sold 2 for a fiver! as far as am concerned we are ruini

9

Scottish AND British,

Edinburgh 29/11/2007 10:32:23

#3 and #4: Better to farm (with safeguards, which were lacking but are now improving) than over-fish to the point of extinction!

My contribution to funny fish names is: Sturgeon.

10

Glenn in Alberta,

Raven, Alberta 29/11/2007 10:32:49

The comment on the absence of fish farming on the west coast of Canada is incorrect. There is an active salmon farming industry in British Columbia.

11

Ghost Of Scotland Past,

29/11/2007 10:44:59

You can't have it all ways, people need to eat and fish is part of the human diet. If we are overfishing the seas
then Aqua culture can go a long way to restocking the seas therefore a balance has to be struck. It not rocket
science is it?

12

just chat,

london 29/11/2007 11:09:13

10#the Danes where using fishing nets that was taking fish uas small as half inch n then used that as a "fertilizer for their apple farms! i saw it on the TV in the 70s,

n after they started coming over here to take our fish they called it common market but the sea round ourshores is part of our farming industry! would theylike our farmers to go over there and take their farms produced?

is common market after all hey said so what's good for them surely must be good for us too,

as far as am concerned EEC or no EEC the fish round britain belongs to britain n no ONE ELSE am not bias as i was not born in britain BUT what's fair is fair they have NO right to take out fish because they have overfished their sea

13

bornNbred,

boycott day 29/11/2007 11:41:06

30TH NOVEMBER 2007

HOOTSMAN BOYCOTT DAY

AM2 WILL HAVE NOBODY TO TALK TO!!! YAY!!

14

bythesea,

29/11/2007 12:20:24

Choices - customers can either pay a premium for a quality product - fish harvested from sustainable fisheries, or they can buy cheap fish harvested without any thought for environmental impact.

Unless MSC (Marine Stewardship Council) certified, both farmed and wild fish adversely impact the marine environment.

It takes about 3 kilos of fish turned into food to produce 1 kilo of farmed fish.

The fishing fleets in Scottish waters discard over 500 million fish per year.

The nephrops fishery in the Clyde discarded 15+ million fish in 2006 - the average weight of each was two ounces !!

#16 'they' have not overfished 'their' sea - ALL countries have overfished THE SEA.

www.ssacn.org

15

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Ontario 29/11/2007 14:13:58

Boy Wonder @

Very clever. You REALLY made me laugh. Thanks.

jennifer

The problems of trying to keep farmed and wild salmon separate are daunting.

We in Canada have had breakouts of farmed salmon into the wide-open and wild Pacific Ocean and pristine wild salmon rivers but the rules and regulations and restrictions have been tightened up and one can only hope that they are working.

16

Tim C,

Southern England 29/11/2007 14:54:34

Denmark and those mysterious sandeels: I have relations in Denmark and before the internet they refused to believe that their countrymen were busy raping the North Sea. Somehow the matter never got much publicity over there.

17

D bute,

29/11/2007 15:04:57

Most of the salmon available in scottish supermarkets is now of Norwegian origin

Scottish farmed salmon is higher quality, tastier and higher price. Often the consumer cannot get Scottish farmed beacuse the demand is so high.

18

Shuggie,

BC Canada 29/11/2007 17:38:20

#10 I must look outside, but I think BC is still part of North West America.
Fish farming and sale is still permitted here, but there is a timetable for introduction of totally enclosed salmon pens.

19

Jamesie Cottir,

yer maws baws 29/11/2007 22:55:55

#12 Scottish AND British, whit a disgrace we don't want you!! No decent moral scotsman considers themselves British!! Should be deported back tae Engurland!!

20

Jean Cannon,

Adelaide, Australia 29/11/2007 23:24:35

There is an almost religious bias against aquaculture by a small but highly vocal group and this confused many of the population. Sure in the first few experimental years, some mistakes were made and should have been expected. The person who never made a mistake never made anything!
Fish farmers know that unless they have clean water they cannot grow healthy fish with the best price. They go to a lot of trouble not to cause any pollution.
If agriculture was subject to the same scrutiny and regulations it would have been closed down long ago and we would still live as wandering farmer gatherers.
Fish do not produce vast amounts of methane and produce less pollution than most red meat. it is also better for our health. if we are not to starve, this is an industry we should support.
I have been helping Australian aquaculture for many years green their businesses and become certified to ISO 14001, the international standard for environmental management.
For more information and case studies go to www.enviro-action.com. Get informed and stop complaining about a much needed industry

21

jerrymanders,

29/11/2007 23:59:09

#10

The ultimate capitalist power just exploits the rest of the world. As they are doing!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.