Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Bendy cucumbers make a comeback as EU shapes up

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 November 2008
CURVY cucumbers and knobbly carrots will return to the supermarket shelves after more than two dozen laws banning imperfect-looking fruit and veg were scrapped yesterday.
EU rules dictating the shape and size of 36 varieties of produce, from apricots to watermelons – effectively banishing all but perfect specimens – were scrapped on European Commission advice in a vote of an EU fruit and veg management committee.

"This marks a new dawn for the curvy cucumber and the knobbly carrot. It's a concrete example of our drive to cut unnecessary red tape," said Marianne Fischer Boel, the EU agriculture commissioner.

"We simply don't need to regulate this sort of thing at EU level. It is far better to leave it to market operators – and in these days of high food prices and general economic difficulties, consumers should be able to choose from the widest range of products possible.

"It makes no sense to throw perfectly good products away, just because they are the 'wrong' shape."

Yesterday's vote repealed 26 of the rules, including those covering artichokes, asparagus, Brussel sprouts, cucumbers, onions, peas, carrots, plums and ribbed celery.

Specific market rules stay in place for the ten products which account for 75 per cent of EU fruit and veg trade – apples, citrus fruit, kiwi fruit, lettuces, peaches/nectarines, pears, strawberries, sweet peppers, table grapes and tomatoes.

But national authorities could exempt even those ten from the rules on shape and size, as long as they were put on sale labelled as "product intended for processing" or something similar.

Bananas, a legendary target for eurosceptics over EU size and shape criteria, are not affected, as they come under a separate marketing regime.

The commission said the changes cannot be implemented until the start of July next year, for practical reasons.

But when the mis-shapen produce does reach the shelves, retailers estimate it could be sold as much as 40 per cent cheaper than the current "class one" goods.

A Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs spokesman welcomed the change as "a sensible first step on the way to further streamlining of the regulations".

Nigel Farage, the UK Independence Party leader and MEP, commented: "This is a rare moment of sense in an otherwise mad world."

And Scottish MEP Alyn Smith said it was "a victory for common sense" – especially as key EU governments, including those of Italy, Spain, France and Hungary had opposed scrapping rules which were brought in 20 years ago under pressure from the European fruit and veg sector to create a level playing field for food quality.

He added: "This decision may just perhaps nail once and for all the myth that the EU regulates everything in sight.

"The rules have actually helped EU trade in fruit and veg because they replaced 27 sets of standards with one set of rules, across a massive market." But Mr Smith warned: "I'm not convinced by retailers promising savings of 40 per cent because in my experience the EU rules are far more flexible than the rules the supermarkets enforce on their producers, but anything that declutters the EU legislative playing field has to be good news."

Conservative MEP Neil Parish said: "Credit should be given to the EU agriculture commissioner for pushing through these proposals.

"Consumers care about the taste and quality of food, not how it looks."

A commission spokesman said: "These rules were originally asked for by the fruit and veg industry, because when a wholesaler orders crates of cucumbers, he needs to have some idea of the quality of the produce.

"We then based our rules on international standards applied by a committee of the United Nations.

"However, times have changed, and we agreed during negotiations last year that we could get rid of red tape in this area."

Richard Ashworth, Conservative MEP for the South East, said: "Food is food, no matter what it looks like. To stop stores selling perfectly decent food during a food crisis is morally unjustifiable.

"Credit should be given to the EU agriculture commissioner for pushing through these proposals, and pointing out that this is a matter that should not be decided by the EU.

"Consumers care about the taste and quality of food, not how it looks."

Q&A

• So what's going on?


About 20 years ago the European fruit and veg sector asked for common EU marketing standards for the quality of produce. The 36 agreed standards included detailed criteria for shape and size of "class one" produce, largely so that when wholesalers ordered crates of goods, they knew what to expect. And so did shoppers.

• So why scrap the rules?

Because costs are rising, food is being wasted and in Europe some supermarkets are setting their own quality controls. The commission says this is an area where EU red tape can go.

• So what's changing?

The vote means shape and size standards will be abolished for 26 products – apricots, artichokes, asparagus, aubergines, avocados, beans, Brussels sprouts, carrots, cauliflowers, cherries, courgettes, cucumbers, cultivated mushrooms, garlic, hazelnuts in shell, headed cabbage, leeks, melons, onions, peas, plums, ribbed celery, spinach, walnuts in shell, water melons and chicory.

• And the other ten?

EU marketing standards stay for apples, citrus fruit, kiwi fruit, lettuces, peaches and nectarines, pears, straw-berries, sweet peppers, grapes and tomatoes, which between them account for 75 per cent of the value of the entire EU fruit and veg trade. But member states can exempt them too.

Scottish scientific research has flavour of success

BREAD that controls diabetes, tomato extract that reduces heart disease and products from blackcurrants that slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease are all being developed by Scots scientists to help fight the war on obesity and poor health.

Leading scientists displayed their latest research to politicians at the Scottish Parliament yesterday.

They described research that is looking into using infra-red technology to find tender cuts of beef and ultrasound to test the fattiness of meat.

Bread high in oats has been developed by the University of Aberdeen's Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health. Oats help control glucose levels, and a study is being carried out to see if it can help diabetes sufferers. The Rowett Institute is also researching high meat diets, to find out whether they help people lose weight.

The Scottish Crop Research Institute has created a bread rich in barley, to see whether it can help reduce cholesterol. Researchers at SCRI are also trying to find compounds in blackcurrants that can reduce the progression of Alzheimer's disease. Waste products from blackcurrants are thought to possess properties that protect the brain.

The SCRI has also been investigating methods to increase vitamin C levels of blackcurrants. Already 95 per cent of the fruit in the soft drink Ribena comes from SCRI varieties.

Scots scientists have also invented a tomato extract that might help to maintain a healthy heart. It has so much promise that Unilever and the Coca-Cola Corporation are planning to use it in a new range of food products.

The Scottish Government provides £60 million a year towards food research.

Richard Lochhead, the environment secretary, praised the work of the scientists, saying: "Scottish science is making a significant input to our developing national food and drink policy, which aims to boost the industry and support healthier and more environmentally-sustainable choices."

He added: "This high-calibre research is helping our primary producers to maintain and enhance the quality of our food and drink, while creating new opportunities for processors."




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 November 2008 11:21 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: European Union
 
1

Dunnie,

Canada 13/11/2008 02:11:54

How you folks got yourselves wrapped in such a "bendy" organisation like the EU is beyond belief!

The EU, to me, is the Euro equivalent of the UN. It is totally out of touch; a bloated bureaucracy that avoids transparency and accountability and coughs up the most unbelievably moronic explanations for its actions.

The EU is an international joke and farce. End it now.
2

Finlang,

Switzerland 13/11/2008 03:43:59
The EU is a discredited organization and if the UK (and a future independent Scotland) doesn't jettison membership in the shorter term then the omens are not good. Scotland's fishing industry is a major casualty and I will never forgive the EU (or too compliant British politicians) for that.

There have been moves afoot in Switzerland to gain membership, but the majority is thankfully against. Any such move is anyway illogical for an economically successful country.

What began life as a reasonably good idea (a common economic market) has turned into a rogue bureaucratic monster, a superstate, a cash cow for retired or failed politicians, and a general disaster for member populations.

Except, that is, for those of dubious repute ... no names, but a couple of gangster-ridden south-eastern European countries is clue enough. Then there is Turkey's perennially pending application ...

I despair at people's apathy in the face of the blindinlgy obvious.

3

Guga II,

Rockall 13/11/2008 06:48:39
The EU is not only a totally discreditied organisation, it is also totally corrupt.

Any business that hadn't had its books signed off for around fourteen years would have seen all the directors gaoled.

The sooner we get out of the EU, along with its abominal CFP and CAP, the better.
4

donald,

glasgow 13/11/2008 06:56:01
#1 "How you folks got yourselves wrapped in such a "bendy" organisation like the EU is beyond belief!"

How about being wrapped up in the Team GB Bendy organisation?
5

drunken proffet,

Tassy 13/11/2008 07:22:47
Come on guys, give them a chance. It is only taken about twenty five years to get the veggies right. Who knows what they may or may not achieve in the next couple of hundred.
6

paulr,

edinburgh 13/11/2008 08:16:28
It just goes to show what a bunch of total morons they are to create these laws in the first place!!!!!!
7

The Goalie,

Planet Earth 13/11/2008 09:15:16
About 20 years ago the European fruit and veg sector asked for common EU marketing standards for the quality of produce. The 36 agreed standards included detailed criteria for shape and size of "class one" produce, largely so that when wholesalers ordered crates of goods, they knew what to expect. And so did shoppers.

The trade asked for these. The supermarkets have their own standards, which are far more in depth and restrictive than any EC standard. Supermarkets reject for minor "defects" and expect the supplier to pay for this through their contracts.
8

,

13/11/2008 10:21:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 13/11/2008 10:43:59
One has to ask oneself the question as to why such ridiculous rules were implimented in the first place.
10

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 13/11/2008 12:32:42
The rules on the curvature of bananas and cucumbers, etc., did not originate with the EU, but with the UN Economic Commission for Europe, at the request of the producer organisations, who wanted common standards for packaging, etc. It was never as senseless as it looked, but it was undoubtedly over-regulation and did the EU a great deal of harm. The standards could have been agreed by the producers themselves without the necessity of European regulation.

Like so much else that the European Union has taken over from other European organisations and promulgated as its own, in order to boost its own status as an all-European government, it was superfluous. The much larger and longer-established Council of Europe, Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the UNECE, etc., do not need to have their legislation processed through the EU, since all the EU states are members of the other organisations anyway and can implement their rules directly without EU approval.

There is a lot of "forest thinning" still to be done by the EU. Its Common Fisheries Policy has been the biggest disaster in the history of European integration, and the only answer is its total abolition, with control of fishing returned to national states. Nothing less will suffice. Who knows, when that and a good deal more has been accomplished, the EU might even develop into an organisation suitable for Scottish membership - which it certainly is not at the moment.

11

brettgallacher,

edinburgh 13/11/2008 13:01:32
its about time the pro euros admitted the eu is a goner, this change of heart only came about because the major growers of fruit have realised even their peoples are beginning to starve, because of credit crunch plus mainly because of the bad weather in last few years, they are growing mainly bendy fruit/ veg and they want rid of it, the economics behind this rule in first place were simple, if someone grows 1000 products of any description ie apples, cucumbers , bananas etc and 500 are bendy they would charge us the twice the price then bin 50% of their produce, scottish fishermen suffer the most, we allow 27 other nations into our waters take all our fish leaving us to pay over the odds for fish , while they and anyone who has been abroad will confirm this, they have never ,ever had a shortage in any hotel the have ever been in
12

brettgallacher,

edinburgh 13/11/2008 13:10:55
but the biggest mass fraud coming now is the euro, why is the euro, dollar getting stronger, when both of these currencies are suffering more than the pound, its really simple gordon blair and the rest of eu want us to join them, devalue the pound then con us into joining, but take it from me ,this is the BIGGEST mistake any pro europeon will ever make, if anyone out there works and earns a wage, this is how it works, at the moment if you earn £300 a week you can get even at todays low rate 117 euros for each hundred pound you earn ,if we join euro you will get like for like ie 100 euros thus losing 17% of your wage,this con took place in 1971, when to join common market we had to change to decimilation and over night we went into a recession that took us nearly 20 years to get out of,
13

brettgallacher,

edinburgh 13/11/2008 13:27:11
plus the mass media, including the anti scottish een, decided what a great thing flooding thousands upon thousands upon thousands of poles , lithuanians etc to take all the availible jobs, now we are having mass job cuts what are the scottish people going to do now, for anyone who watched boys from the black stuff years ago its deja vu, then we flooded in cheap and nasty labour and created a jobless society for the people of this country, everwhere you go you will see, not the hard working pole ,lituanian we were brainwashed into believing was here but the guy.girl whose in the blackmarket, ie cleaning jobs , bar work, bouncers etc plus and the een and lothian borders police no this they are muscling in on the drug trade, forget all the cr4p stories you read in een about the wee scots gangster running cocaine, herion trade it is the CHINESE, ASIAN GANGS that are,the wee ned is just the front, or do you relly believe the same ned gets a plane to afghanistan and brings back over billions of kilos of said drugs,

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.