Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Food prices soar - and death gorges itself

View Video
Download Video

Video

Valerie Browning of Oxfam reports from Ethiopia
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 July 2008
OXFAM Scotland today launches a fresh appeal to stop millions starving to death in east Africa.
Food prices have rocketed by 500 per cent in some regions in the past two years, pushing between nine and 13 million people in Ethiopia, Somalia and Kenya into destitution.

Pests and diseases have also blighted the area, with infestations of caterpillars damaging 70 per cent of crops in northern Kenya and a virus decimating goat and sheep populations.

Deepening the crisis are rising fuel costs, war and the second serious drought in three years.

Aid workers warn that, although the scale of the crisis has yet to reach levels that triggered Bob Geldof's Band Aid response in 1984, the situation could worsen if nothing is done.

Rob McNeil, an Oxfam spokesman who recently returned from Ethiopia, said: "This is a catastrophe in the making, but we have time to act before it becomes a reality.

"Some of the roads we travelled on were littered with dead livestock because there is little or no pasture or water.

"People are becoming increasingly desperate. I saw people in one village pounding food pellets intended for animals into porridge to feed their families."

Oxfam reports that a United Nations appeal for emergency aid for Somalia, one of the worst-hit countries, has received only 37 per cent of the funding it needs to meet the cost of imported rice, which has shot up by 350 per cent in the past 18 months. More than 30 per cent of the population are in dire need.

The Ethiopian government says it needs £215 million to provide emergency food assistance, with the number affected doubling from 2.2 million in January to 4.6 million. The price of wheat has also more than doubled in the past six months. A quarter of all children in Turkana, northern Kenya, are suffering from acute malnutrition.

Aberdeenshire singer Sandi Thom will today front Oxfam Scotland's appeal by helping to construct an 11,000-litre water tank in George Square, Glasgow, to illustrate the charity's response to people in need of humanitarian assistance.

Judith Robertson, head of Oxfam Scotland, said: "Governments must invest in concerted action to tackle the underlying causes of gross inequality of wealth. Without this, scenes of destitution will continue to haunt our shared conscience."

• Donations can be made online, by phone on 0300 200 1300, at any Oxfam shop or by post to Oxfam East Africa Appeal, 207 Bath Street, Glasgow G2 4HZ.

IN NUMBERS

5.8 million
people were dependent on relief food in 1986 after famine in Ethiopia.

One million
copies of the first Band Aid record, written by Bob Geldof and Midge Ure, were sold in the first week of sales.

35,000
children die of hunger-related causes, according to Actionaid.

10 million
people needed food in the 1984 famine.

23 million
Africans received emergency aid in 2005 and 2006.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 July 2008 12:07 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Ethiopia
 
1

brian mcc,

the arctic 24/07/2008 01:36:27
There is a rat infestation in a northern province of India threatening the entire rice crop. The bounty on the rodent is 2 rupees/tail. The rest of the beast is eaten in some parts of the world...

In the war of man and beast, who will prevail?
2

,

24/07/2008 04:06:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

The Daleks,

Longmen 24/07/2008 06:28:24
Africa is currently a failed continent.

The so-called leadership of the continent continues to loot and pillage with one hand, while holding out the begging bowl with the other. A begging bowl we are always too happy to fill, without holding holding anyone to account.

The time has come to turn off the aid tap, and let the corrupt and despotic presidents either fix the continent's problems themselves, or have the angry masses replace them with men who can.

We have problems of our own to take care of, and our public money should be spent improving the lives of those it was taxed from in the first place, not topping up the Swiss bank accounts of people like Mugabe.
4

carrottop,

Dumfries 24/07/2008 07:36:35
The only one of the above countries I have any sympathy with is Kenya as they at least have made an effort to build a decent country, as for the others I came across enough of them during my years in the east end of London to make sure that I never so much as fly across their countries.
5

Boy Wonder,

24/07/2008 08:10:33
#3 Africa is a failed continent because it has been consistently raped for centuries by Asia and Europe!
6

The Daleks,

Longmen 24/07/2008 08:24:12
#5 Boy Blunder.

Oh no, not that old apologist excuse!

Europe and Asia have both raped and plundered each other historically, and both Europe and Asia have been subject to all sorts of internal raping and plundering.

Yet as continents, they're not basket cases. Africa is.

You can't blame others for Africa's home grown despotism, corruption, and incompetence. The blame lies firmly within Africa itself.
7

Keep Scotland Green,

Doune 24/07/2008 10:04:14
May none of you ever be in a position of not having enough food or water to keep your children alive. We have squandered billions on a pointless war yet we seem to have troubles finding money to provide food or water to the world's poorest. Water for God's sake!!!! This is not about Mugabe. Oxfam does not provide money to the government, they run their own projects and make sure the money gets to people who need it. Your comments and heartlessness make me sick.
8

Findlay Thompson,

24/07/2008 10:13:42
#6

"Exterminate....."

“You can't blame others for Africa's home grown despotism, corruption, and incompetence. The blame lies firmly within Africa itself.”

Please do a little more research. First world countries for example United States, Japan and certain members of the EU have for a considerable number of years been very happy to keep despots & their regimes in various countries on the African continent in power.

In exchange for exploiting some of these countries vast mineral wealth and paying for it bottom dollar the first world countries prop up and sustain these regimes.

Does it not surprise you how countries such as US & UK are reluctant to get involved in any internal conflicts?

The only scenario that would worry the first world sponsors would be if a genuine citizen of a particular country who wants the best for his/her people & state comes to power!

9

The Daleks,

Longmen 24/07/2008 10:46:53
#7 How long do we have to keep bailing africa out? At some point they have to stand on their own two feet and take responsibility for themselves.

#8. Fistly, my original point was about ceasing to prop up despots via aid as a means to forcing Africa to get its house in order.

Secondly, the despots and their thugs are all African. Generation after generation. Born and bred.
You can't keep on blaming the West for Africa's endemic criminality and incompetence forever.
10

Silence of the Yams,

24/07/2008 11:08:04
9. The whole of black Africa will be in Europe by 2020, those that can walk or crawl that is.
11

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 24/07/2008 11:29:15
Africa is a lost cause because of the despotic and corrupt rulers such as Mugabe and those in Sudan and the Ivory Coast (Cote d'Ivoire).

Even Mbeki of South Africa is crazy supporting Mugabe and one wonders at the sanity of the both of them.

Is Mbeki going senile like Mugabe or is it just a coincidence that they are both stupid despots with evil intentions?
12

Itchy,

24/07/2008 12:02:35
#5 Africa is being raped by Robert Mugabe and his like. That cannot be blamed on Britain.
13

Booster,

24/07/2008 12:17:56
There is so much hypocrisy attached to this issue it is hard to get enthused by it despite the dreadfulness of it all.
The "easy" approach has been taken for far too long - that is, throwing money at the problem to salve consciences, rather than tackle the hard long-term issues.
With the world population expected to grow from 3 to 9 Billion within the life time of some alive today, we really are on the highway to hell, where Africa will get even less attention.
14

Booster,

24/07/2008 12:26:49
Oooops the World Population today is 6 Billion not the 3 Billion I stated.

In 1960 it was 3 billion - it has since doubled in less than 50 years.

15

Gulliver,

Harare 24/07/2008 13:13:31
I agree with those that say Africa should learn to get rid of the dependency syndrome.

I also agree with the OXFAM analysis that realizes that "Governments must invest in concerted action to tackle the underlying causes of gross inequality of wealth. Without this, scenes of destitution will continue to haunt our shared conscience".

Contrary to popular belief, Mugabe tried to address the controversial land question in Zimbabwe not only in terms of establishing justice for the unfairly marginalized indigenous majority, but also in terms of trying to tackle the problem of food security.

Certain citizens of the country, although making up less than 1% of the population, owned more than 70% of the arable land, including most of the best land. A WORLD BANK report produced around 1995 showed specifically mentioned the need to address this situation in order to stabilize the country not only politically but also in terms of food security.

Unfortunately, the program has hit a couple of snags in terms of the susceptibility of the country to years of consecutive droughts which has been the largest single factor affecting output in the country apart from other challenges.
16

person who's right,

Edinburgh 24/07/2008 15:21:34
I do wonder at some of the nonsense spouted on this page. Before bleating 'charity begins at home', or 'we should be spending our money on our own problems', have you given this a second's thought?

Let's take the 'spend our money where it's raised' argument. So does that mean that if a hurricane ravaged the whole of Ireland, we should help those in Northern Ireland and leave anyone 10 metres across the border in the Republic to die?

As for the 'it's all Africa's fault' argument... For a start, many countries in Africa are not especially corrupt (remember cash for honours, BAE/Saudi deals and so on...). And even if they are: Tony Blair took us to war in Iraq. I thought that was a very stupid decision, tried to stop it, but it went ahead anyway. Does that mean I, as a UK citizen, should be punished for his mistakes? Do you really think that humanitarian assistance should depend on the lottery of which country you happen to be from?

And finally, the current economic system is stacked against the developing world. Organisations like Oxfam, SCIAF, Concern, Christian Aid, Trade Justice Movement and so on are the ones who are trying to change all that. Support them..!
17

Bemused and above it all,

24/07/2008 15:50:36
Dont want to seem pessimistic but there are simply too many people on earth for the planet to sustain, all the great civilisations reached the point of implosion, Mayans, Abyssinia (ethopia), Greece, Rome etc. Why should we think we are above it, its the natural order and as horrible as it is to consider Globally we are pretty much knackered, running out of space to grow food, materials to supply energy all to sustain our disposable culture whilst polluting the environment and causing extinction of other speices. If we are the apex predator on the planet the the worryingly sharp increase in the number of lower level speices is an alarm bell we should heed but whether or not we restore balance in time to prevent a serious global collapse remains to be seen
18

Bo28,

24/07/2008 16:25:46
Theres a lot of poorly thought out rubbish in these comments.

Turn off your televisions.

'National Debt' is something that affects most countries including the u.s and britain. Debt to who? Debt to the central banking system that has hijacked the financial sovereignty of the nations they are within. These corrupt private bankers also hold the third world constantly on the verge of starvation, they are behind the oil and food prices and a host of other terrors.

They are also in the driving seat of the corporate media who expose anyone who disagree's with anglo-american imperialism as a 'dictator' and 'tyrant'. Time to wake up. Time to do some research for yourselves. Turn off the TV. Turn off the TV!
19

oder,

Scotland 24/07/2008 17:22:36
15 Gulliver,Harare

you forgot to mention that Africans are not and never have been farmers, as you are aware African culture is base round cattle the one percent of the population fed 100% of Zimbabweans and a fair number of millions in the rest of Africa! 70% of the arable land you talk of is was only a small percentage of the total land area of Zimbabwe! no doubt your a Mugabe war veteran you need to stop blaming everyone else and take a good look at yourselves, Hitler started out a nice guy too!
20

Mashimaro,

China 25/07/2008 06:22:49
Thanks America! We won't forget your hand in this.
21

Mashimaro,

China 25/07/2008 06:44:17
#16 "Do you really think that humanitarian assistance should depend on the lottery of which country you happen to be from?"

Yes. People die. Everyone dies eventually. So what difference does it make how that happens? We have more than enough people on earth as it is. Africa is a prime example of this. You had disease, predators and natural disasters killing off people. People had huge famlies to compensate for this. All was well. Then you had richer countries insisting that these people should not "suffer" the diseases and natural disasters. The people STILL have large families (because god forbid anyone should interfere with their "right" to reproduce). And now you have dessertification and drought and starvation. It doesn't take a genius to work it out. Nature had it worked out.

"And finally, the current economic system is stacked against the developing world. Organisations like Oxfam, SCIAF, Concern, Christian Aid, Trade Justice Movement and so on are the ones who are trying to change all that. Support them..!"
Oh really? Actually what they do is stifle any local suppliers and turn them into beggars too. Their continued provision of supplies continually floods the markets and drowns out any natural form of competition and business. In the long run all you are doing is keeping the problem alive.
22

Gulliver,

Harare 25/07/2008 08:07:57
To some extent there is merit in the argument that developing countries need to deal with population growth in order to achieve sustainable development.

I am not going to be dragged into discussing the politics of Zimbabwe because at the end of the day it goes beyond Zim. Resorting to name calling because of the failure to raise valid points is not my cup of tea.

When one talks about population growth and sustainable development it is important to realize that whilst the number of people on the planet has increased so has our ability to reap more from the earth because of advances in technology. Whereas 50 years ago the bulk of developing world may have relied on animal drawn implements for farming, the world today has tractors and other mechanised machinery that can be used to drastically increase output. Advances in the use of fertilizers and pesticides have meant that previously where the land could only yield 3 tons/HA today we can get 9-12 tons/HA of maize for example.

Due to the advances in irrigation technology and use of greenhouses we are now able to farm on arid land and thus increase the total land available for farming.

On the population growth front many developing countries (in partnership with the rich nations) have managed to achieve reduction in infant mortality, and tackle many diseases that previously kept populations low. It is CRITICAL that one clearly analyses the cause-effect relationship and correctly diagonise the challenge of population growth. It is not because people in poorer nations just have a rabid propensity to reproduce!! Their previous socio-economic circumstances such as the need for manpower to till the land and high infant mortality rate and overall health challenges (malaria, TB, etc.) required that they attempt to have more children. It was their natural response to the need to SURVIVE. Now that the circumstances have changed it is now a question of educating the people and it takes a bit of time to change surviv
23

Gulliver,

Harare 25/07/2008 08:13:19
...it takes a bit of time to change survival strategies which may have come to be accepted as "cultures".

It is also important that Sub-saharan Africa may be facing severe challenges from the HIV epidemic and so some myths about population growth in the region need to be adjusted accordingly.
24

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 25/07/2008 09:37:51
Mashimaro

Shut the eff up!

You and your lunatic comments are superfluous to present needs and totally irrelevant 99% of the time.

Go back to your room at the local insane asylum and take your meds.
25

,

25/07/2008 14:19:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Mashimaro,

China 26/07/2008 15:28:25
Ah postmark, that's just not true. Look at the money poured into Africa and what comes out of it? The fact is that the people who "have" are the strong and those who "have not" are the weak. Over history those change. Who cares?
27

,

11/10/2008 20:56:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.