Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Room for improvement in commuting attitudes

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 June 2009
IT'S not so much sitting in your office which wrecks your green credentials as moving to and from it. Much of the business travel we undertake is frighteningly damaging to the environment.
You only have to look at the queues which build up at peak hour on Glasgow's Kingston Bridge or at Edinburgh's Gogar roundabout to see the sheer wastefulness and inefficiency of trying to move around by car.

Encouraging people to work from home w
herever possible – perhaps for a couple of days a week – is one way of cutting down on the environmental waste of the daily commute. These days, technology makes this option easy, though staff should be given the choice about whether they want to do so, as some people find it very difficult to be self-supervising and prefer the structures of the traditional office environment.

It makes sense to instruct staff to travel by train whenever possible – and if they are travelling between major city centres, there is no excuse for them not to do so. Train journeys are now frequent – every 15 minutes, for instance, between Edinburgh and Glasgow – and efficient. They also offer value for money and allow staff to work while travelling. Granted, most journeys in Scotland still rely on diesel trains, but even that's a lot greener than pumping out from a car exhaust.

What, though, if you're travelling to places where a train journey would simply be impractical? Many firms, of course, retain a fleet of company cars, both as an executive perk and to allow key staff to move from point to point efficiently. But there may well be other ways of organising car travel that are both cheaper and kinder to the environment.

One option is to use a car club. Edinburgh, London, Bath and Bristol are among the cities which have these. The way they work is relatively simple: a number of cars are parked in spaces on the road near to your premises. You book one in advance for a predetermined period, use a swipe card to unlock it and drive it away, and return it on time. Bookings can be extended if necessary – the advantage is that you only pay for the time you use. Normally fuel and a certain number of miles are included, so costs are completely transparent. This is clearly a greener option than buying or leasing vehicles which may stand idle in the company car park for much of the day.

In London, much has been made of fully electric cars such as the G Wiz, a tiny Indian-built vehicle which claims to be both green and highly efficient. It is not really practical outside the capital at present, though, as other cities lack the "juice points" needed to recharge these vehicles regularly. Servicing outside London is also very expensive.

Finally, given that aircraft are constantly becoming greener, transport managers should not dismiss air travel as an option. Scott Grier (pictured), chairman of Scotland's domestic airline, Loganair comments: "The aviation industry has come in for a lot of unfair criticism in recent years for being environmentally unfriendly, but it contributes just 2 per cent of all emissions.

"Loganair is a small player and we are operating smaller turboprop aircraft than most airlines. These planes not only have lower emissions than jet aircraft but because they fly at lower altitudes, they are far less damaging to the environment.

"A few years ago, Highlands and Islands Enterprise commissioned research into the environmental damage caused by different forms of transport in the region. This research found that aviation in the Highlands and Islands, where Loganair mainly operates, is less damaging than the nearest forms of alternative travel which are cars and buses."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 June 2009 9:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Padraig,

25/06/2009 00:28:54
Let's be clear - this is not balanced reporting by a journalist; it is propaganda which is not attributed to the author, a left-leaning Green, less concerned with truth and balance than making his pitch, ever more desperately as the global warming myth loses its influence and, wait for it, the earth is cooling! (See the commentary in "MSPs get power to fine over climate change").

I realise that it helps fill the pages very cheaply to simply reprint this kind of blarney but can we please have it attributed to the propagandist who wrote it?

Then people can value it as it should be (nil) and not lose confidence in The Scotsman and its "information".
2

Padraig,

25/06/2009 00:31:16
Oh, and just who, other than Leftists who hate any kind of personally owned transport and sandal-wearing eco-economists, would actually want to !improve their Green credentials", particularly in the middle of a recession?
3

Gordon Clifford,

Denai Spain 25/06/2009 11:57:05
#1

I think that you are being just a little harsh, some of the suggestions in the admittedly un-attributed piece do have some merit, reduction in car usage and working from home are serious considerations. I lived and worked in Houston Texas for several years and car pooling was actively encouraged by major companies with financial incentives offered for those who did. People car pooling were permitted to use special lanes on the highways. Texans might just take exception to being called left wing trendies.
High speed Park and Ride services from the suburbs to city centres were also very popular. Whenever possible employees were also permitted to work from home on a set number of days each month. All of these measures were designed to reduce car usage and the inevitable congestion and fuel wastage.
4

Padraig,

25/06/2009 13:19:51
The weakness here is that the congestion is artificially created by the local authority in a politically-inspired effort to remove cars from the city and increase bus use, regardless of the convenience of these buses.

However, I agree that home working is laudable - the trouble is that relatively few employers in the UK are willing to let their staff off the leash, so to speak, so home working is unlikely to affect traffic volumes.

High speed park & rides are also a good thing - but absent here because the local authority will not provide an express bus service - instead, local routes now include the park & rides, stopping as usual on the way into the centre.

And Edinburgh has nothing like the volume of traffic (or the population) of Houston, so has nothing like the problem that it mitigated by multi-occupant schemes.

As I said, in Edinburgh, the local authority is more concerned with obstructing car use than with solving any traffic problem.

Like man-made global warming, Edinburgh's congestion is a politically inspired measure to achieve political ends, not to actually improve the life quality of all the residents.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.