Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


More children make the grade in 'vintage year' for exam passes

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 August 2008
PUPILS across Scotland will enjoy a "vintage year" for exam results with an increase in pass rates for both Standard Grade and Higher exams announced today.
Pass rates for Highers and Intermediate 2 exams have shown a significant increase, as thousands of students prepare to receive their results this morning.

The overall pass rate for Highers jumped to 73.4 per cent, compared to 71.7 per cent last y
ear, with marked increases in English, which hit 68.3 per cent – a 4 per cent rise on last year.

There were also slight increases in maths, physics, biology and chemistry.

Pupils sitting Intermediate 2 exams saw the pass rate increase by 2.6 per cent on last year, with improvements in maths – up nearly 4 per cent, and physics up 9 per cent for the same period.

Judith Gillespie, from the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, said the results reflected well on the education system.

She said: "These results look good and pupils should be well pleased. It's pleasing to see, a good vintage year."

Figures from the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) showed that the overall pass rate for Standard Grades had risen from 97.6 per cent in 2007 to 98 per cent this year.

That reverses the last year's slight dip, when the pass rate had fallen for the first time in four years.

There was a small drop in the pass rate for Standard Grade English, which went from 98.8 per cent last year to 98.7 per cent this year.

However, the pass rate for Standard Grade maths increased from 97.4 per cent to 98.7 per cent. The statistics show a decrease in the number of Standard Grade exams that students took, falling from 404,638 last year to 386,857 this year – a drop of 4.4 per cent.

This is a continuation of the downward trend in recent years, as some schools seek to replace them with Intermediate exams. Figures point to an increase in the number of Intermediate exams, which are designed to be taken in between Standard and Highers.

The figures were released to coincide with thousands of youngsters receiving their exam results today.

About 20,000 students who signed up for a special scheme were due to get their grades by e-mail or text message at about 8am. They, along with those who sat exams earlier this year, should also receive their results' certificate today.

Commenting on this year's results, Dr Janet Brown, SQA's chief executive and Scotland's chief examining officer, said: "I am delighted and greatly encouraged to see the increase in numbers of learners achieving our qualifications, and the steady growth in pass rates. These results show continuing strong achievements in what is a robust Scottish education system.

"Almost 160,000 learners will receive results today and I congratulate them all and wish them continuing success in the future."

Fiona Hyslop, the education secretary, congratulated students on their achievements.

She said: "I know today's results represent months of dedication and hard work by them (the pupils] and their teachers, combined with support of their parents and friends have resulted in the certificates they have received today.

"As Scotland's young people continue to aim high and achieve so much, we can look to a future where Scotland is smarter and we can compete on equal terms with the rest of the world, even in these difficult economic times."

Ms Hyslop also had words of advice for those who did not get the grades they were hoping for, telling them comprehensive advice and support would be available to all pupils to help them realise their goals.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 August 2008 9:50 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

05/08/2008 00:05:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 05/08/2008 01:51:48

#1

"The money will be used to create 1,000,000 Scottish Astronaut's to go to mars"

But not before the are given some redicolous,..

"School Meals" to send them on their way!
3

Guga II,

Rockall 05/08/2008 05:59:22
The dumbing down of the Scottish education system continues apace.
4

madrab,

Edinburgh 05/08/2008 06:51:39
If you make the exams easier to pass then more will do so.
5

Peekay,

05/08/2008 07:12:50
#3&4. How do you know that the exams are easier? By what indices are you comparing them with past exams? Just interested to know what information you base your opinion on.
6

silent majority,

edinburgh 05/08/2008 08:15:50
Here we are again - the usual rubbish about exams being made easier. Presumably we have older people posting on here who were beneficiaries of the so-called harder education system
#1 - the word is "astronauts"
#2 - why have you used an apostrophe to pluralise the same word? And the word is "ridiculous"
#5 and 6 - exactly.
Young people are better taught (by an all-graduate profession) in better schools and in smaller classes than in previous years. Why not give our young people the credit they deserve instead of trying to claim that, somehow, the their exams are easier than before.
7

silent majority,

edinburgh 05/08/2008 08:18:12
apologies for typo - last few words should read "..that their exams are easier than before". I will correct myself before anyone else does.
8

AngusB.,

Iraq 05/08/2008 08:55:49
Having had experience of working in FE (I appreciate it isn't secondary), imo it is the system at fault not the student. Government intervention/meddling has had significant impact; an example of this being when OFSTED visited not so long ago - any 'troublesome' classes were tucked away conveniently. Plaigirism, late hand-ins, poor quality work was all par the course - not the lecturers fault but policy from above.

#7, I was taught never to use a conjunction to begin a sentence (and), have I been taught incorrectly?
9

JG,

Fife 05/08/2008 09:16:16
#7 silent majority
It's not rubbish at all - the exams HAVE been dumbed down. I understand that some subjects are different (we didn't have computers when I was at school, for example) but things like maths and English sre still being taught. You asked for evidence of the "dumbed down" effect; look how many children are leaving school without a grasp of numeracy or literacy. I know there were children of my era in the same boat but they weren't trying to secure a University place!!!
10

Peekay,

05/08/2008 09:33:32
#10. Please do tell me the source of the "evidence" that you cite.
11

JG,

Fife 05/08/2008 09:58:31
#11 Peekay
Oh it was only some of the universities having to teach potential "new starts" the basics of maths and English before they began the course proper.
12

The Answer,

Glasgow 05/08/2008 10:14:14
Good news for England!

Scotland contributes only 7.5% of total new UK undergraduates, imagine how much lower the figure for Scotland would be without zero tution fees...

% by country and region

London 15.8%
S East 13.6%
N West 11.8%
Eastern 8.5%
W Midlands 8.7%
S West 8%
Yorkshire and The Humber 7.7%
Scotland 7.5%
E Midlands 6.5%
Wales 4.8%
N East 3.7%
N Ireland 3.6%

Wales + N Ireland 8.4% (combined smaller population than Scotland, yet outperform Scotland in qualifying new undergraduates)

I'm lovin it!

page 30

tinyurl.com/5r8rb2
13

,

05/08/2008 10:30:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Miss H,

05/08/2008 10:58:56
3 and 4. You are wrong.

The reason there is a higher pass rate is because schools no longer present pupils unless they are confident that they will gain a good pass. Private schools have always done that - because they were judged on their pass rates - but state schools did not always do that. When I was at school I failed my maths prelim for example but still sat the exam – which I also failed. That would not happen today. It’s a consequence of the decision to rate schools according to exam passes. Those pupils who are not practically guaranteed a pass don’t sit the exam.

15

Miss H,

05/08/2008 11:00:51
12 That is not a source.
16

Peekay,

05/08/2008 11:04:34
#12. Still no source. Please do give me a citation so that I can find this evidence, or even identify who "some" of the Universities are. I teach in one of the ancient universities so I should be able get hold of the evidence once you tell me where to look.
17

JG,

Fife 05/08/2008 11:13:39
#16 Miss H
#17 Peekay
I read it on the internet (I think it was also on the TV news and in the newspapers) - I'm not making it up. Look it up for yourself. Maybe it was some English University so that won't count, right?
18

JG,

Fife 05/08/2008 11:17:15
#18
I just did a quick search myself and found this quote;

"Two thirds stated that extra numeracy classes were now "the norm". Poor mathematical skills were the biggest problem facing the universities, but the vice-chancellors also complained about declining writing skills, their students struggling with basic grammar and unable to write essays."

Is that evidence enough for you?

19

Miss H,

05/08/2008 11:19:17
19 No - clearly they did not teach you how to cite sources when you were at school!!!
20

Miss H,

05/08/2008 11:47:26
Dave the first story addresses the argument made by Andrew Cubie that funds should be diverted away from higher education to tackle inumeracy and illiteracy. It does not say that Scottish students are illiterate or inumerate.

The second story compares Chinese and English universities.

The third story comes from the an edition of the Telegraph based on research conducted by the Conservative Party in English universities.

Where is the applicability to Scottish universities?

Or are you simply making the case that inumeracy and illiteracy exist in Scotland? Yes they do. But by what logic do you make a connection between that fact and published exam results? The pupils who sit these exams are neither illiterate or inumerate.

I repeat - schools will only present pupils to sit examinations if they are confident that they will pass. That is the reason that pass rates have improved. The pupils who lack the skills to pass exams don't sit them.

21

Liz,

Edinburgh 05/08/2008 11:50:22
There is no point debating this, standards have been dropping for years.

I was a school not that many years ago and even then when you looked back over past exam papers you could see them getting progressively more difficult as you went back through the years. Add to that the larger elements of course work which more often than not are done by parents and the fact that students are spoon fed the syllabus by the teachers so the students know exactly what will get them what marks without actually needing to understand anything. It is not a surprise that the pass mark keeps increasing.

Basic standards amongst school leavers are poor (of course there are and always have been excellent students). I was looking at CV's recently with my work from school leavers (and some graduates) and it is quite shocking how poor the grammar and spelling are. English was always one of my weak points but even some of those with so called "excellent exam marks" made me look good.



22

JG,

Fife 05/08/2008 13:03:12
#20 Miss H
I know full well how to "cite sources" and could do so if I were completing some sort of exam that required it. Clearly this was a requirement for you when you were studying politics wherever you were. I try to avoid using party manifestos for my opinions; I have the intelligence to form my own!
23

Miss H,

05/08/2008 15:23:39
25 But you did not provide any references or sources to back JG in her endeavours. Do you consider it ill mannered to point out that you cannot substantiate an argument? I guess you win all the arguments in your house.

If either you or JG can post any actual proof that exam pass rates have improved because standards have slipped then you should do that.

Otherwise you are insulting every pupil who has worked their socks off over the past year to pass their exams for no purpose. And that is what I call really ill mannered.
24

Miss H,

05/08/2008 16:11:11
28 Yes as I understand standard grades are becoming obsolete. In my day and probably in yours there were O Grades and Highers and that was it. Now the landscape is more complex. You get standard grades, intermediate 1 and 2 and two grades of highers.

25

akjem,

dundee 05/08/2008 16:25:44
#15 writes "The reason there is a higher pass rate is because schools no longer present pupils unless they are confident that they will gain a good pass."
I think Miss H is closest to the truth. I have been a secondary school teacher for 37 years and can confirm that many pupils at all levels are advised not to take their 'external' SQA exams if failure is inevitable. Presentation at a lower level (eg. Intermediate 2 instead of Higher) is always advised where a pupil has little chance of passing. This has less to do with producing enhanced pass rates and more to do with giving individual pupils a realistic chance of success. Those who suggest that exams are easier to pass are perhaps unfamiliar with the current education system. Whereas in the past only the 'academically' gifted pupils were the centre of most teacher's attention, all pupils are now given as much encouragement as possible to engage with the learning process. Give your sons and daughters a break!
26

LCW,

Wishaw 05/08/2008 16:54:30
My Father has just came home & asked me how i got on in my exams which i told him. My results were fair, not exceptional or horrendous, although did not dictate anything as i already have my place at Uni.

He then proceeded to have a jab about how i 'should've done better' and 'could've tried a lot harder' coming from a man left school with nothing other than a boot up the back side!

It's people like him who have probably posted the comments about how exams are sooo much easier.

#27 the standard graders would've found it difficult to pass the exams because they did not STUDY an O Grade course, they STUDIED the standard grade course.
I very much doubt if people who sat O Grade or the old highers would pass a current exam paper.
27

Peekay,

05/08/2008 19:01:54
Dear oh dear! Only in this country would we go to such convoluted lengths to deny the achievements of our young people. Sad.
28

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 05/08/2008 19:57:52
It makes me sick to my stomach. These poor young people cannot read or write or do proper arithmetic. It isn't their fault. The liberal left PC brigade stopped corporal punishment and even detention; these kids have no respect or freedom anymore. It is a tragedy and we will reap what we have sown.
29

JG,

Fife 05/08/2008 20:26:05
#26 Miss H
The FACT is that many young people are leaving school with an armful of certificates without being able to construct sentences, spell or identify what a paragraph is. Their maths abilities are abysmal. Of course they are passing the exams they are being set but that says more about the quality of the exams than the capabilities of the children.

A friend of mine decided to take her higher English after many years away from education. The tutor asked the class to tell him when they passed their O level and when she said the date the class burst out laughing. The tutor told them not to laugh - her O level was worth just short of the current higher!!
30

akjem,

dundee 05/08/2008 21:19:44
#34
"The FACT is that many young people are leaving school with an armful of certificates without being able to construct sentences, spell or identify what a paragraph is."

"A friend of mine......... her O level was worth just short of the current higher!!

Sorry JG. Your first sentence is mere supposition, based probably on your own particular impression, rather than any empirical evidence.

It is a fact that 18% of adults in Scotland currently experience literacy and numeracy problems: (Changing Lives: Adult Literacy and Numeracy in Scotland)

Your second statement needs clarification. How can the tutor you mention possibly compare the present Higher English award with an O Level certificate gained in 1985 or earlier?

The only possible connection might be that a pupil getting a 'D' (fail) in the 'old' Higher was given a compensatory O Level instead. The current Higher English course is a combination of internal and external assessments and cannot possibly be compared to an O Level. The tutor was perhaps being diplomatic and certainly ever so slightly misleading.
31

JG,

Fife 05/08/2008 21:48:23
#35 akjem
Re my first statement - I refer you back to the problems experienced by universities having to hold remedial classes in maths and English for first year students prior to beginning their degrees. Or are they just making that up too?

Perhaps the tutor in the second point I made had taught the subject for many years and was able to judge accurately by comparing the expertise required to pass both exams (bear in mind I said JUST SHORT of the higher, I didn't actually equate the two).

As for your statistic about the level of literacy/numeracy problems in Scotland being 18%, I watched a part of that programme but don't know how they arrived at that figure. Presumably it's just a "guestemate" as it's unlikely they've spoken to everyone in the country. I also doubt that those admitting to having problems now sat any exams in the past.
32

akjem,

dundee 05/08/2008 23:57:56
#36

Which Universities JG? How many students?

If Universities accept undergraduates with the necessary qualifications, why the need for remedial work? Must be a very small number, surely. Strange.

The tutor you refer to, if experienced as you suggest, should know better than to compare two entirely different exams at least 27 years apart. To suggest a pass at a lower level pre-1985 is equivalent to "just short of a Higher" is meaningless.

Anecdotal evidence is interesting but not for serious consideration.

The statistic I refer to is contained in the current report by HMIE.(I don't know what programme you refer to). You're right, I doubt if they spoke to everyone in the country. However they gathered evidence from Primary, Secondary and Further Education as well as the Scottish Government covering the period 1999-2006.

Your last sentence intrigues me. Another sweeping generalisation based on assumption, not facts. Literacy and numeracy problems are identified early and quickly in the education system, not by examinations.. The lack of resources in schools, to deal with learning difficulties, is a major drawback in tackling the problem.
33

JG,

Fife 06/08/2008 09:26:58
#37 akjem
I don't know how many universities but the article said "a third". I think that's quite a lot! Also if the students were accepted on the strength of their exam results (the norm, I suspect) their lack of basic knowledge would not come to light until after they turned up to start their degree courses.

The TV programme I referred to was on a few days ago and showed how adults with numeracy and literacy problems were being helped to overcome their difficulties. If these people are identified "early and quickly in the education system" how come so many adults still have problems with reading etc.?

I think that "learning difficulties" is a completely different thing from people who find it difficult to learn.

My last sentence was not a "sweeping generalisation". Those adults taking part in the TV programme would have been unable to read exam papers and would not have been included in any figures about exam passes or failures (the topic supposed to be being discussed).
34

,

06/08/2008 12:51:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
35

Climate change is a fraud,

07/08/2008 11:51:51
Do you trust your government?

The spell is broken: Lecturer calls for spelling amnesty on students' top 20 errors
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1042425/Why-ignore-bad-spelling-Lecturer-calls-amnesty-students-20-errors.html

One in five UK adults 'illiterate'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/811832.stm

Can't read, can't write
Channel 4 from 21 July 9pm
Today in Britain, over five million adults have a reading age of 12 or less or, worse, cannot read at all.

You might want to know why.

http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.