Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Child among five dead in Highland road crashes

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 July 2008
THREE adults and a young child died yesterday in a horrific fireball crash on a notorious stretch of road in the Highlands.
The incident happened yesterday afternoon on a single carriageway stretch of the A9 at The Slochd, between Aviemore and Inverness. Reports say a Volvo and a pick-up truck burst into flames after being involved in a high-speed head-on collision.

Pa
ssing motorists present at the scene, close to a popular tourist beauty spot known as The German's Head, attempted to rescue the casualties from the burning wreckage, but only two of the six people involved are believed to have survived. They were taken to hospital, where their conditions were described as "serious". Less than an hour later, Highland rescue services were stretched by a second fatal crash 32 miles further north on the B9163 between Conon Bridge and Culbokie.

A woman was killed instantly after her car left the road near Urquhart burial ground, making her the 11th victim on Highland roads in the past seven weeks.

One motorist who witnessed the A9 crash said one of the vehicles involved narrowly missed his own car and ploughed into the vehicle behind. Ben Hayes, 34, was driving north with his partner and nine-week-old baby when a car swerved towards him from the opposite side, he said.

"It started to drift across the road so I pulled in as tight as I could. It hit the car behind us head on," he said. "I saw it in the mirror, and it burst into flames. It didn't look like anybody would be walking away from it."

It is believed that the occupants of the Volvo were a Dutch family holidaying in the area. The male driver and his two-year-old son were killed instantly, while a man and woman in the pick-up truck, believed to be from the Fife area, were also killed.

A female survivor was taken by helicopter to Raigmore hospital in Inverness, while a four-year-old girl was taken by road ambulance. A second eyewitness said: "It is a miracle anyone survived. Both vehicles were welded together by the heat.

"It was impossible to tell what make of pick-up truck was involved. It ended up on top of the Volvo. They were both burned-out shells."

Northern Constabulary's Chief Inspector Jim Neill said: "It was an horrific incident for everyone to deal with. Anyone who is driving on the A9 should be aware of the speed limits and take extreme care, especially foreign motorists."

The road was closed for several hours and diversions put in place. Motorists were advised to avoid the area as long tailbacks were reported.

News of the deaths is likely to intensify calls for changes to the A9, which has gained a reputation as one of Scotland's most treacherous roads.

A campaign is already under way to persuade the Scottish Government to widen the entire stretch from Perth to Inverness to double-carriageway status. Murdo Fraser MSP, deputy leader of the Scottish Conservatives, last week added his voice to calls for an upgrade, saying statistics showed accidents were four times more likely to happen on stretches of the A9 which were single carriageway.

He was speaking after an accident last weekend in which a man and his granddaughter were killed after being involved in a four-vehicle collision north of Dalwhinnie.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 July 2008 12:10 AM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

Mad Jock,

East Lothian 27/07/2008 00:38:13
I was using the A9 last week, just the day before fatal crash at Dalwhinnie. Without witnessing either accident, but just observing the standard of driving on that road, it is quite apparent that bad driving is to blame, not the road layout. The problems caused by bad driving start with cars travelling too slowly. It's a good road, with no sharp bends at all. If the speed limit is 60mph, then do 60mph, not 50mph.
The slow moving car then creates a queue behind. This is made worse by more bad driving. Bunching up. This prevents anyone behind from overtaking safely without having to pass more than one vehicle at a time. It also prevents safe overtaking in itself. You need to leave a gap to improve your sight lines, as well have room to accelerate before overtaking, minimising the time spent on the wrong side of the road.
The only really dangerous stretch is the ludicrously short dual carriageway at Newtonmore. This creates the suicidal last ditch attempts to pass the last bus/ caravan/ truck before going back to single carriageway.
It would appear that funding is an issue for dualling the A9 all the way. Why can't the European Union fund it? They have been spending Billions of Euros on the Continent on new or upgraded roads. Could it possibly be because our incompetent ministers and civil servants never get the requests done in time or correctly?
2

Rabster,

27/07/2008 01:25:50
Bad driving is indeed the cause of most accidents rather than the road being inherently dangerous, but the better the road the less chance of accidents occurring or being fatal. The A9 should now be put next in line for an urgent upgrade to dual carriageway given the number of accidents there have been. It would have economic benefits as well by better connecting the Highlands to the Central Belt.
3

fife runner,

27/07/2008 07:26:56
passed that spot about two hours previous yesterday. agree bad driving. If car drivers cannot do more than 40 mph on the road then perhaps it is time they hung up the keys, or at least pull into lay byes to allow overtaking. I was quit frustrated at times. Also, roads are far too busy now to have caravans or these mobile homes trundling along.

here in Fife we havew the same problems. Slow cars on country roads holding everyone else up. Remember, the best sped for fuel efficiency is near 60mph. So slow drivers cause global warming.
4

fife runner,

27/07/2008 07:30:12
also you get cars at the front of queues going at near 60 then for no reason they slow to 40 then up to 50 then back to 40 then up to 60. Lack of concentration. Very frustrating as you do not know one minute to the next can I overtake. Then when you do they speed up again as if you are challenging them in some way. It is older drivers ( I am 56) who act in this idiotic way.
5

UrbanFox,

Edinburgh 27/07/2008 08:40:42
These fatalities are tragic and my thoughts are with relatives and survivors.

I also agree that the reason is bad driving not the road itself although dualling would certainly reduce the death toll.

If a vehicle is seen with a long line of traffic behind it the police should charge the driver for not pulling over. Signs should be put up saying it is an offence to hold up traffic due to slow driving.

But I have also witnessed some horrific driving from usually sole males eg overtaking long lines of traffic at speeds of 80-90 mph. This is the fundamental reason for these horror crashes. The speed limit is 60 mph and if no one exceeded it the number of fatalities would drop very sharply.
6

calum,

27/07/2008 08:48:58
As long as we have a Government who is intent on squandering our money on a tramLINE in Edinburgh which is not needed and has no overwhelming business or safety case for its justification, tourists and locals alike will continue to pay with their lives for the lack of investment on the most strategically important goods/tourist route to the Highlands. I hope the MacDonalds and the Foulkes and others who are so enthusiastic about a £1/2 billion + orgy of spending can allow their conscience to deal with that.
7

It's me!,

27/07/2008 09:02:16
There are loads of lay bys on the A9 a slow driver can pull into to allow faster traffic to pass them in safety. However oncoming traffic should not pull out to overtake until it is safe to do so thereby avoiding the chances of a head on collision. I would like the police to take a much firmer line with the bullies that like to tail gate the guy in front even though he is travelling at the speed limit. Dangerous driving in the extreme.
8

lodger,

Highland 27/07/2008 09:04:20
Actually, the most efficient speed for petrol or diesel engines is between 45 and 50 mph. This can be proven on bench tests.
The best speed to drive is - in accordance with road conditions -and traffic density.
9

ConnorD,

27/07/2008 09:46:18
Of course bad driving contributes to the vast majority of crashes but the fact remains that the A9 is not fit for the job it has to do, particularly at this time of the year with the increase in tourism.
Equally, the point about the trams is a good one and really does make a mockery of the SNPs pledge in its manifesto before the last election to dual the A9. There should be an imediate cessation of tramworks and the project abandoned for the white elephant it is becoming. Equally, immediate steps should be taken to start the legal process for CPOs to begin dualling the A9 as promised to reduce the tragedies that their dithering is responsible for.
10

Upbeat,

27/07/2008 09:51:05
Another tragic accident , and lots of worthless and "holier than thou" speculation over how this occured. Not one pontificates about possible mechnical problems , a tyre burst, a wheel bearing failure. Not one.

There are thousands of reasons why two vehicles may come into contact with each other . Some may be to do with road design, some may be to do with driver behaviour. Very few have road design as the core reason.

The instant solution for the A 9 is to take a whiteline rumble strip painting machine and designate a third lane in places where it is wide enough. Then resitrict any overtaking, from one direction only, alternately to these places. In Europe where this is properly done using modern materials, Combined with physical barriers , a central moulded concrete ridge, and clear signage the risk of cross over accidents is far reduced.

The A9 at present is a free for all, "road hog in the middle versus chicken" game being re-enacted every day. Until underpasses and interchanges are built at every junction the whole way from Stirling to Inverness, dualling this road would involve wholesale re-engineering, just 25 years after it was completed to the present high standard . With a finite roads budget there are worse roads with greater priority for funding throughout Scotland
11

ConnorD,

27/07/2008 10:20:33
"With a finite roads budget there are worse roads with greater priority for funding throughout Scotland" - Yes there are poor roads all over Scotland but the estimated cost of a lost life is over £1million and the per capita death rate on the A9 would make every justification in a safety case for immediate measures.
Are you possibly suggesting that a "greater priority" is a tramline in Edinburgh which has no safety case? That certainly seems to be the priority with the Scottish Government.
12

ConnorD,

27/07/2008 10:24:20
Further, it is interesting that you accuse others about pontificating and then you do it yourself. Mechanical failure is a very rare cause of all crashes, estimated by some experts to be less than 2%.
"The vehicle went out of control", "the vehicle left the road" are non-starters really.
Best to wait for the expert Police investigation and the resultant FAI rather than speculate.
13

,

27/07/2008 10:48:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Gabriel,

Edinburgh 27/07/2008 10:55:56
This is another example of why Scotland should become independent, so as not to rely on funding handouts from London. The A9 is a national disgrace and would qualify as a B class road in the English Midlands or South England.
15

Upbeat,

27/07/2008 10:59:01
12 ConnorD

Read all the accident reports and then make a judgement. Mechanical failure, or a tyre blow out cannot be excluded...I would have expected you to understand that .

What is this £1 m figure...what does this equate to ? did you read it somewhere ? It's a nonsense speculative figure..and you should recognise that.

Are you really saying that the other deaths / injuries / car's written off on Highland roads don't count because even though they far exceed the number damaged on the A9 they occur on different roads and as isolated events cannot be statistically relevent ?

Finally, introducing the trams into this discussion , as if it was some either or question is absurd. Trams are infrastructure for Scotland's capital city. , NHS spending is NHS spending , and MSP's salaries are MSP's salaries.etc.

Such budgets are determined in consultation with the electorate ,and with other interest groups. I might moan at the vast waste of resources policing Football games, a cost which should be met in full by those who wish to put the police to this extra bother...ie the football fans. ... Would you agree ?

No... I thought not.
16

Upbeat,

27/07/2008 11:01:58
14 Instead of being so damning . I suggest you read the BBC report here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7527191.stm

These foreigners ...as you term them,.... could well have simply been in the worng place at the wrong moment.
17

calum,

27/07/2008 11:08:41
Here he goes, Upbeat, our resident expert in nothing. Last weeks fatality involving the caravan was exactly as you describe - wrong place, wrong time, not the driver's fault.
FYI, your point about football policing prices is nonsense - football clubs pay the full price for officers attending to police matches, somewhere around £30ph currently. The fact remains that in a finite budget (your words) the Scottish Government has choices to make. It chooses to built a tramLINE in Edinburgh rather than improve the central spine road to the Highlands with the result that the death toll continues. Shame on them.
18

Upbeat,

27/07/2008 11:10:20
15

"The A9 is a national disgrace and would qualify as a B class road in the English Midlands or South England."

Total and utter rubbish. The A9 is and remains the most formidable engineering triumph in Scottish roadbuilding, ever undertaken. It has changed the dymnnamics of transport in the whole of Scotland. Things that were previously brought to the highlands by sea or along the A82 from Stirling and Glasgow, are now taken to Inverness and redistributed south and west again.

This has rejunvenated a whole City and district around Inverness, and brought a huge vitailty all along the A9 corridor.
For this is the legacy of the A 9 improvements completed in the 1980's. Of course it now requires some modernisation, and various inadequacies of the original concept, such as Ballinluig, can be rectified, in the face of escalating traffic loadings. But B class road ? ....it is not.
19

ConnorD,

27/07/2008 11:16:16
#16 - The £1m figure is a Government figure, not a nonsense speculative figure. Have a look a Government reports on-line and educate yourself.
Introducing trams into this subject is relevant because the Scottish Government at Holyrood must make admittedly difficult decisions in how to allocate capital expenditure. It is shameful that the choose to waste money on a project with no safety benefit, whilst the safety case for other transport problems, like the A9, is overwhelming.
Just for a moment, I thought you knew what you were talkng about but you don't.
20

Upbeat,

27/07/2008 11:20:24
Calum ,

You march into it again.

If ,as you now wish to claim all the costs of all policing of football games is indeed met entirely by the football fans, ( which it is not....) then is this a wise use of resources ? Would it not be better if the fans behaved better ? Could the money not be better spent. ? It's a question of alternative uses of resources.

You think that throwing money at the A9 instead of a much needed tram project for our Capital city , would save lives and improve the lives of those who live in Scotland.

You "the expert" ;-) tell me how you make this assumption: that by reducing private motoring, and improving journey times in our capital city for the next generation of Scots, this can be assessed against the costs of accidents today along any major road. If you can do this you are really some sort of expert in statistics.

BTW such a balanced assessment is impossible.
21

calum,

27/07/2008 11:28:21
#21 - In a final comment to a tiresome bore, the police costs are paid by clubs.
The tram is not "much needed" in Edinburgh, a city which once more has picked up a national award for the best bus service/company in Britain. If you would rather spend money on a tram rather than safety then it says a lot about you.
You talk absolute drivel but I note that you continue with your silly Emoticon "winks". Here's an emoticon which is ideal for you. Have a nice week, (_*_). End.
22

Upbeat,

27/07/2008 11:30:46
20 ConnoprD.

This is the trouble. You have grabbed some statistical broad brush, without reading what it means. The cost figure will have been arrived at as a broad average of all costs associated with all motoring incidents, and you have sought to apply it to a unique set of circumstances on a smaller highway. The Government statistical figure is pure mathematics . The way the average is calculated includes motorway delays, disruption due to road closures , and repairs to the carriageway. It is not a good figure apon which to base any argument. ( eg One accident less = £1m extra for this road, another accident less + another £1 m etc. ) It does not work like that.

Finally it was not me that introduced the question of trams to this discussion. Nor anywhere have I sought to claim I was right. This is a debating comment forum...if you don't care for the chance that your comments will be read and commented on ...don't contribute.
23

JulesF,

27/07/2008 11:30:58
Ahem, the Scottish Government AKA the SNP did not want the trams.
24

Upbeat,

27/07/2008 11:32:27
Calum

The prospect of proper discussion defeats you again. Enjoy your weekend.
25

ConnorD,

27/07/2008 11:38:30
#24 - That is true but they voted for them. They have to live with the consequences of that, particularly when a manifesto pledge is, thus far, a broken promise. They could, even as an interim, inject funds into proper robust policing of the A9 to shape driver behaviour and compliance with the law whilst at the same time halting the ludicrous tram project, which has no safety case to drive it.
Upbeat, I note that you seem to be criticising me for introducing the trams issue (a related transport issue) and yet you seem to do the same with another post about football (not a related issue. Strange.
26

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 27/07/2008 11:45:50
That accursed road! Didn't the SNP promise to dual it all the way if they got elected? Or is it my failing memory letting me down?

Words are cheap!
27

Scottish exile,

Edinburgh 27/07/2008 12:01:18
The A9 is a truly accursed road. The horrifying truth is that most people in Scotland can refer to either a friend or member of family who have been involved in a serious accident travelling on this road.
It is the only road travelling north from Perth up to Inverness. It splits into A76 at Newtonmore to go west. It is a long lonely red line traversing north. Originally built by General Wade to get his redcoats up to Culloden, it doesn't seem to be much improved since then! Just some asphalt. It hasn't changed or improved for over 50 years. Just more asphalt and a few bits added on at the edges. In comparison look at the lovely roads in Portugal (pop. 4 million)paid for by EU. And where would Ireland be without EU roads?
28

Firefighter,

Highland 27/07/2008 12:12:34
I travel the A9 on a regular basis and most of the time it is a pleasant journey, however it is true that there are drivers that cause frustration but what I find more aggravating is the ones that think that 80-90mph is acceptable There is a speed limit on this road and if drivers set out to ignore this then perhaps they should fly or take the train. All too often I am one of the ones who have to turn out and pick up the pieces. What happened to the families this weekend was a tradgedy and we should be thinking of them, try putting yourselves in their position. Until the police investigation is complete, blame should not be apportioned to road conditions, other drivers, mechanical failure etc The only people that can reduce these collisions are yourselves the "other drivers" Stay safe
29

Corrennie,

27/07/2008 12:13:21
## 14 ##

quick to blame the foreigners, aren't you?

If you read the BBC report and what the witness says, the 'pick-up (Fife registered) veered over on to the other carriageway towards the witness who pulled over as far as possible, and saw in his mirror, the (pick-up) hit the other vehicle.

You weren't there. Don't be so quick to apportion blame.

And remember that while they are crawling along/taking photos/etc, the foreigners are bringing tourism money in to the area.
30

Upbeat,

27/07/2008 12:16:17
28

you should know that between 1974 and 1982 the A9 was rebuilt, much of it on a new line from end to end.

This wideneed the 18 - 21 ft carriageway which wound through each of the towns and villages on its way north , to provide a bypass for all towns and every village. Ne viaducts were constructed where possible, and a new line was sleceted in many areas. Finally the specification insited that from any one point on the highway it should be possible to see a clear line extending 150 yards ....in each direction. This was teh biggest single earthmoving project ever attempted anywhere in europe up till that time.

To claim anything else about the history of the present A9 is misleading in the extreme.
31

Upbeat,

27/07/2008 12:25:09
31 ......From end to end... my apologies .....as far as Inverness anyway.Since then massive improvements have occured further north. In 1982 the Kessock Bridge opened to link the north of Scotland across the Black Isle and provdes a shorter line than the old A9 through Dingwall as well.
32

bill-alba,

fife 27/07/2008 12:52:15
connord....the scottish government didnt vote for the trams they voted against...the scottish parliament dominated by lib/lab/tory voted for the trams..
Anyway I travel the A9 quite often and I am overtaken regularly at the wrong place and have to break to avoid collisions...so bad driving does have a major effect.
33

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 27/07/2008 19:20:18

Why is this story under the Education Section,?
34

Murdoch,

Fort William 27/07/2008 23:17:51
The last few days have seen two fatal road accidents on the A82 south of Fort William. Should it be dualled too?

No.28 Scottish Exile

I don't know if it is true that most people in Scotland have a friend or family member who has been involved in a serious accident on this road - but I can tell you I know 4 people that have died on the A82 in three seperate accidents.

Dualling the A9 would consume the Scottish roads budget for a decade or more. Enforcement of speed limits and some junction improvements would save lives and be a fraction of the £billion or more it would cost - money that could be spent on saving more lives on some of the other "notorious" roads in the country.
35

truthsleuth,

29/07/2008 00:49:29
#35 Murdoch,

You got it smack on

#34 Charles Linskaill,

If you dont know why thats why its in the education section.

36

KMcD,

Hamilton 30/07/2008 12:38:47
Firstly Thanks you to UPBEAT 16
The two ppl in the pick up wer family of mine. It has been suggested that the driver had a heart attack behind the Wheel. So please before jumping to conclusions and damning drivers for the way they drive think of all the possiblities ie mechanical failure, medical problems.
37

truthsleuth,

03/08/2008 01:02:11
#19 Upbeat,
A9 carries but a fraction of the traffic on most A roads in England or in the Central Scotland belt.

PS
It (traffic) aint nothing to be ashamed or proud of though the engineering may be.
38

truthsleuth,

03/08/2008 01:09:44
Dualling the A1 cost £120million has done nothing to reduce accidents but the increased speed of the traffic has increased the seriousness of the accident.
39

Fae Fife,

Bainbridge island 12/08/2008 04:33:02
Speed, ma friends, is the cause of most crashes. (These are not accidents when idiots who think they are better informed on the appropriate speed to drive, no matter the conditions, drive at 60, 70, 85 and more.) It's rarely the slower driver that is the cause of the crash, more likely the impatient driver who thinks it's okay to pull out and take a chance of passing one or two cars at a time. Maybe the A9 is not perfect and maybe the government should be spending some of the money it will be pumping into motorways in Glasgow on the A9 but the reality is that most crashes are avoidable. If you drive with patience and tolerance for all the other road users, you'll likely arrive at your destination. As for trams, I must reckon that Grenoble, Lyons, Manchester, Dublin, Berlin, Amsterdam, San Diego, Denver, Milan to name a few cities that have them, most be ignorant to the knowledge and wisdom that some of the Scotsman comment posters hold. Trams are part of the solution to congestion and carbon emissions: driving your car too much is part of the problem.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.