Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Incompetent teacher banned from every classroom in the UK

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 December 2008
A TEACHER described as a danger to herself and her pupils has become the first to be struck off for incompetence.
A disciplinary sub-committee of the General Teaching Council for Scotland yesterday heard that Susan Barnard from Perthshire showed little empathy for children.

At the hearing it was revealed Mrs Barnard had said of a crying girl with a facial deformity: "There's nothing wrong with her tear ducts then."

Another girl broke her wrist after being chased by pupils Mrs Barnard was supposed to be teaching at the time and the former teacher antagonised colleagues with disparaging and sarcastic remarks.

The 55-year-old also used sign language with children who neither needed or understood it, and often set work that was too difficult for pupils.

After previously pleading guilty to the incompetence charge Mrs Barnard claimed mitigating circumstances and asked to remain on the teaching register.

She blamed her poor performance on the stress of teaching a violent pupil who kicked and hit her repeatedly in the face in 2003.

This, she claimed, triggered health problems associated with a car accident in the 1980s which had killed her boyfriend and blinded her in one eye.

Mrs Barnard trained in New Zealand, but returned to the UK in the 1980s. Concerns were first raised when she began working at Coupar Angus Primary School in Perth and Kinross in 2004.

Complaints from colleagues sparked an investigation, but despite extensive support from council officials and moves to two other schools, she was dismissed in 2006.

In her defence, she said: "I have a style of interaction with children which does not include talking to them with effusive praise.

"I don't call them darling, or honey or babe."

However, the panel ruled she would be struck off and banned from reapplying to join the register for 12 months.

The move effectively bans her from teaching at any school in Scotland or England and Wales.

Leaving the hearing, Mrs Barnard said only that she was "disappointed", but did not say whether she would appeal the decision.

One parent, Allan Hunter, criticised Stirling Council for allowing Mrs Barnard to teach on a supply basis until 20 November this year, knowing she had been dismissed from Perth and Kinross.

He said: "There will not be many people disappointed with this decision in the Stirling area."

He added his 11-year-old daughter had become confused by lessons and reluctant to go to school after Mrs Barnard began teaching her.

Anthony Finn, the teaching council's chief executive, described it as a difficult and landmark case.

FACT BOX

THE power to strike off bad teachers was granted to the GTCS in 2006 through the McCrone deal, which increased teacher salaries in return for improved standards. The move aimed to prevent teachers sacked for incompetence from moving to another council area to work. Previously, teachers could only be struck off for misconduct, not for simply being bad at the job.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 December 2008 11:02 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

EPS,

Edinburgh 04/12/2008 00:17:57
I don't doubt that the decision to dismiss this teacher was correct, but it is a pity for her that the matter is so much in the public eye. In most jobs a dismissal for incompetence is hardly newsworthy.
2

Fifi la Bonbon,

04/12/2008 01:41:34
This public humiliation is a disgrace.

Shame on the pharisees at the General Teaching Council for Scotland for dragging this out in public. I guess the press will go where the story is, but shame on you too, The Scotsman.
3

Finlang,

France 04/12/2008 02:05:27
I agree with #1 and #2 on the sensationalising of this "story". In other employment circles, the dismissing of an incompetent would be a simple matter of "out the door" with minimum fuss. But education, with its concomitant "our children" byline is always an emotive field and brings out the worst (usually ignorant) excesses in all concerned. Watch this page as the day goes on. Hence The Scotsman's airing of it.

In my previous career in teaching I knew a couple of teachers who could fairly be described as incompetent. One survived until retirement and the other was eventually, and correctly, eased out the door with no publicity.





4

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

04/12/2008 04:04:51
Oh well, it'll all be tomorrows chip wrappers anyway.
5

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 04/12/2008 06:59:40
Pity we can't sack our politicians as easy.
6

Pocket Dictionary,

04/12/2008 07:16:15
Pity there are no sanctions against the incompetent parents who send their children to school, expecting teachers to do something with their unruly children.
7

gus1940,

Edinburgh 04/12/2008 08:25:56
While the dismissal and striking off may be justified I find it disgusting the way this poor woman's case has been splashed around the media.

Would it not have been effective just to publish the fact that an unnamed teacher had been dismissed and struck off.

8

gus1940,

Edinburgh 04/12/2008 08:28:34
When the quislings at The Scotsman eventually get their due deserts I hope that they will be hounded by reporters and camera crews and their incompetence and bias publicised.
9

ZipptJeffrey,

Castle 04/12/2008 08:45:14
I am glad that awful woman has been sacked. It can take years to weed out devious and incompetent teachers from the teaching system. The fact she never took any responsibility for her actions or even apologise, shows that she should be not be teaching kids. What scares me is , how many more incompetent devious tachers out therte are still in the system affecting and ruining our kids chance of a decent future. I have yet to meet a teacher in public life who actually came across has a human being. No common sense whatsoever.
10

Ally,

London 04/12/2008 09:17:55
I agree that this shouldn't be news but the teaching unions have made it impossible to get anyone actually stopped from teaching until now. So it's news that SOMEONE has been struck off, not that this particular woman has.

I would hope that in future this sort of thing won't be news - that we can all have confidence that there's an effective process by which incompetent or dangerous teachers are removed from the profession in a timely way.
11

Archie, Gourock,

04/12/2008 11:20:04
Teaching is another word for incompetence and failure. It's what those who resign from real life do. Those who can do; those who cannot.... join Labour.

Anyway, I remember a wee ditty in McCrone.... up to a third of all teachers will be usurped for underperformance by 2008. Wonder if this sacrificial offering had anything to do with that "pledge". In return, teachers will receive huge salaries, comical hours and even less responsibility. Well, it implemented one part pretty much spot on!

I'd say conservatively, that 40% of teachers aren't fit to teach - at any level.
12

Mcsnagpile,

04/12/2008 12:22:26
She has been pilloried. I consider all the publicity and speculation on this woman’s character and abilities as criminal
13

kinneucher,

Amsterdam 04/12/2008 12:49:44
I agree that this public humiliation is a disgrace. As for Archie from Gourock, 40% of whose teachers weren't fit to teach, (and it shows); are 40% of parents not fit to bring up a child but learn by experience?
14

Highland Mist,

04/12/2008 17:44:35
The only thing that is a disgrace about all of this is that incompetent and useless teachers have been able to keep their jobs until now. IF they want to be professionals then they have to be judged by professional standards and capable of upholding them. If they're not then they should be removed as this woman quite rightly has been. Some of what she did was absolutely horrendous and what is a tragedy is that she must have ruined so many children's education in the time she was teaching. Get rid of the rest of them now and raise standards and give a bit of respect to thise teachers who deserve it.
15

Highland Mist,

04/12/2008 17:47:40
#13, I take it you're a teacher? The rights of the child are greater than the rights of the teacher that is appointed to serve THEM and not ridicule them the way that this woman did. Lawyers, doctors, accountants, dentists, all otehr professions are judged by professional standards and hold onto the right to practice their jobs only if they uphold standards. If teachers are going to be professionals in the true sense of the word then they have to be accountable to those that they serve and to the other members of ehir profession who ARE doing a good job.
16

Thistledhu,

04/12/2008 17:51:07
#14 if a parent is not fit to be in charge of a child (in most cases) the child is removed by social services up to now if a teacher is not fit to teach he/she is allowed to carry on with generouse pay pension and holidays spot the diffrence?
17

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 04/12/2008 17:51:54
I wonder if all the people who routinely criticise teachers would be able to do the job themselves ? Somehow I doubt it. I can only join in with the other, reasonable, posters to say that this woman's public humiliation is very distateful, I don't see why her anonimity couldn't be protected. She would have been struck off just the same.

BTW it is not my opinion that ONE teacher can ruin an entire child's education - that is nonsense. I am not defending incompetent teachers, but to use one woman as a rod to beat a profession's back with is unworthy of reasonable people.
18

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 04/12/2008 17:54:25
''generouse(sic)pay pension and holidays''

Is that the issue then ?

There are a lot of people who get more generous terms and conditions than teachers - think bankers for example.

And no, I am not a teacher.
19

Thistledhu,

04/12/2008 17:55:51
me thinks the inbuilt arrogance of teachers is surfaceing in some posts here, how dare mere mortals discuss the dark art of education
20

Thistledhu,

04/12/2008 18:08:54
19 the issue is not the pay or allowances the issue is provision of a good standard of teaching. politcs apart name me a profesion where incompatence is openly tolerated.
21

Jolly,

Edinburgh 04/12/2008 19:11:56

#12 Archie/ Gourock!!
Are you a conservative?? Either way, you are ill informed!!
22

Hugh Roscombe,

04/12/2008 19:41:12
21 Thistledhu

"politcs apart name me a profesion where incompatence is openly tolerated."

How about your incompetent post? Obviously you were taught by a "bad" teacher. If you are going to make a point about educational issues, please have the decency to post in the Queen's English.

Politics, profession & incompetence. There we go. That's you corrected.
23

Hugh Roscombe,

04/12/2008 19:42:07
Maybe you should change your moniker to Thistle duh.
24

Hugh Roscombe,

04/12/2008 19:44:13
Thistle duh

I've had a look at more of your rubbish

Surfaceing; generouse? WTF?

25

Hugh Roscombe,

04/12/2008 19:44:28
Just killing time ......
26

Thistledhu,

04/12/2008 21:08:32
25 Thanks i feel enlightend now.

if all you have to add to the discusion is mud slinging then you have nothing to add at all
27

Finlang,

France 04/12/2008 21:09:22
#23, #24, #25 Hugh Roscombe
LMAO - and that's not taking the wacky punctuation into account!
28

Thistledhu,

04/12/2008 21:23:49
Oh dear some teacher's have woken from their afternoon nap!!!
29

Thistledhu,

04/12/2008 21:35:51
Hugh Roscombe and Finlang


Arrogance is the pride of fools as you show so well.
30

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 04/12/2008 21:41:14
21 - where do you want me to start ?
31

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 04/12/2008 21:43:44
What happened Thistle, did a big bad teacher scare you in the classroom ?

If it was an English teacher, you should have paid more attention.
32

Finlang,

France 04/12/2008 22:50:30
#29
"... some teacher's ..."

Discuss.
33

Highland Mist,

04/12/2008 23:27:57
# 18 Observer. 1,Glasgow 04/12/2008 17:51:54
"I wonder if all the people who routinely criticise teachers would be able to do the job themselves ? Somehow I doubt it."

Why do you doubt it? There are plenty folk out there who, gioven proper training would be as good as, if not better than, many of the useless teacher's I've come across. Now there ARE some fantastic teachers - but I think what can't be ignored is that ANY professional person has to be accountable to their clients and not allowed to keep a job for life when they are clearly incapable of it. Other professionals are named when they are 'stuck off' - think doctors, dentist, lawyers etc etc - so, if teachers want to be truly professional they must accept the good with the bad. What I find absolutely totally unacceptable is that this woman is the FIRST for this to happen to - in any profession there are people who have to leave as they're not capable for any number of reasons and quite frankly after the way she treated her clients (children) she has to be named - maybe others will think twice now about carrying on with such arrogance adn ritually humiliating childen purely because *they can* because they are above the law and above being disciplined. Up until now any fruit and nutcase could teach and keep their job for life - what the heck sort of "professional" standard is that? Other professions have a body to answer to that answers to consumers and customers - teachers, until now, have had a UNION which puts their rights ahead of teh rights of the CHILDREN that they serve - so what sort of profession is that?!
34

Highland Mist,

04/12/2008 23:31:26
QUOTE:" At the hearing it was revealed Mrs Barnard had said of a crying girl with a facial deformity: "There's nothing wrong with her tear ducts then." "

What an arrogant, obnoxious woman. I defy anyone to say that she should not be named, shamed and blamed. As should any other teacher who speaks to or about a child like that.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.