Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

New ward to ease pressure of needless admissions on A&E

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 July 2008
A NEW observation ward is to be created at the Royal Infirmary to prevent people needlessly being admitted to the main hospital.
The 12-bed unit would help health chiefs continue to hit targets without causing unnecessary disruption.

It would also free up beds in the main hospitals for patients in need of urgent treatment.

The ERI's accident and emergency unit is Scotlan
d's busiest, seeing 300 patients a day, over 50 per cent more than any other.

However, NHS Lothian is expected to see patients within four hours of them coming through the door.

Some patients need to be observed for six or eight hours, depending on their injury, so as they reach the four-hour mark they are admitted to the main hospital.

This takes up valuable bed space as well as patient and hospital staff time.

NHS Lothian wants a halfway house, where patients can continue to be observed for a short period, without having to be admitted.

Eddie Egan, employee director and vice-chairman of the NHS Lothian board, said: "(The ERI's] A&E is getting up to 98 per cent (of patients seen within four hours], which is a phenomenal performance and all staff have to be congratulated.

"But we are having to admit people and then discharge them within a few hours just to meet that target. If this is the case what are we going to do about it?"

James McCaffery, NHS Lothian's director of acute services, said: "It's early days but we are actively considering a 12-bed observation unit near A&E.

"This would provide a specialist area for some of the patients who currently have to be admitted to an inpatient bed.

"These are people who do not appear to need admission but may require tests to get a full picture of their condition, or who need to be kept comfortable until we are confident they can go home.

"The unit would assist in ensuring that those patients requiring acute admission are prioritised while those awaiting the results of tests are cared for in comfort.

"

The type of patients who would benefit from such an innovation would include those suffering from head injuries, who do not need additional treatment but should be monitored.

Tom Waterson, chairman of public sector union Unison's Scottish Health Committee, said: "In the past if anyone came in with a head injury they always had to stay in for 24 hours, now that has reduced.

"However, it is a necessity to keep patients in until you are sure they are right to go home, primarily for the patients themselves, but also for staff's peace of mind.

"That's why an observation ward is such a good idea. It will help staff, help patients, and help the flow of people through the hospital."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 July 2008 10:58 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh Royal Infirmary
 
1

MummyWease,

28/07/2008 14:40:40
It may also relieve pressure on the Western's ARU when I had to spend 3 hours last week. Even the staff said it was busy and they were rushed off their feet with no cubicals availble that I was examined in their staff room to try and get the waiting time down. The service I received was excellent but sat in a corridor with about 15 others wasn't the easiest thing and I wasn't allowed my husband with me at a time when I was scared of what may be happening to me. Thankfully it was all ok and different from what the original thoughts were, but the staff were fantastic even though they were completely overun with patients
2

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 28/07/2008 14:45:18
The NHS needs to be completely disbanded and rebuilt from scratch preferably by doctors and nurses from BUPA at the helm ...

BUPA = Efficient and Friendly - £50 a month
NHS = Slow, dirty, unsecure, poor quality - £170 a month (assumes 60,000,000 contributing if you divid this by the amount of 'Tax Payers - it is 3 times that figure)

Effectively what this means is that if the NHS was run as efficiently as a private practice it could do the same job for 1/3 of the price and just imagine what it could do for 1/2 the price !

There should also be a small charge for using A&E or going to your GP - this may discourage alot of the time wasters and most folk would welcome that.
3

,

28/07/2008 15:13:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

alex paterson,

edinburgh 28/07/2008 15:39:38
This is a great idea,but does it include the drunk tank.
5

MummyWease,

28/07/2008 15:51:30
#2 the problem with Bupa is that you don't get a refund when you pay upfront and then get discharged early. My experience with the NHS has been a battle to leave when I felt ready yet consultants didn't feel I was.
6

antifa,

28/07/2008 17:19:59
#2 You're comparing apples and pears. BUPA's bread and butter is delivering simple, elective care treatments to the middle classes. This can be done very cheaply. The NHS delivers the full gamut of services to the full population (most of its money goes on the elderly, and most of this to the dying). This costs a huge amount more.

Can you name one health system based on private funding and delivery that is better value than the NHS? I will tell you: you cannot.

Fancy going down the US road? They pay 16% of their GDP on health - about twice what we do (and their GDP per capita is higher). Yet they have £40m uninsured and millions more underinsured - and the whole system has terrible health outcomes.

See the annual reports of the World Health Organisation if you don't believe me.
7

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 28/07/2008 20:17:16
3 ... What can I say. You clearly think the NHS is great when is is obviously an aged and failing organisation. It is so unionised and inefficient that most folk would weep at the incompetence and waste.

The other side of the coin is our own people - everybody seems to run to the doctor if they break a fingernail or stub their toe - or if they get drunk and fancy someone to talk to .... there really should be some sort of time wasting penalty to pay. Hypochondria and general patheticness should not be on the NHS list of diseases to treat.

The NHS has 1.3 Million staff of which about 10% are actually Doctors about 40% are Nurses and the other half are 'support' staff. 130,000 doctors should easily be able to cope with a population of 60m - easily ! - now the question I am asking is why is it not coping and you get all nasty ? Do you have a point ?

At least 5 & 6 make a contribution and some fair points ...

6 - I think the NHS should go back to basics and provide a few essential services and do them very well - I guess you think it should be all encompassing - but why not let the private sector provide the bells and whistles at the patients own cost? The agenda needs to be driven by practicality not PC mumbo jumbo and endless debate over 'moral' issues. Why not charge time-wasters too ?
8

celtic4,

USA 29/07/2008 04:13:39
#6..What is wrong with the US road??? Our clinics sure don't make people wait for four hours before getting seen, niether do our hospitals. And for your information, we have free clinics for the non-insured that take care of every little problem, with no long waiting period. I don't have to read some article you pointed out. I live here! And the health of the general public is good, by the by.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.