Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Expenses shock as politicians' claims go down

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 May 2009
POLITICIANS in Edinburgh are at the centre of another expenses shock – the amount claimed by city councillors has actually gone down.
In stark contrast to the claims at Westminster, the annual table reveals local politicians claimed £49,958 for travel, food and other expenses in 2008-9 – nearly half the total of three years ago.

Click here to download the table of expenses

The fall in expenses has been credited to a greater diligence by councillors when deciding on what to claim, though senior politicians have also admitted a series of Evening News investigations in recent years into taxi fares – which saw the £14,000-a-year bill drop by a third – has also made councillors more wary about making rogue claims.

And today's figures also show the amount claimed varies widely, ranging from £2,765 for the city's Lib Dem transport leader Phil Wheeler to zero for Labour's Liberton and Gilmerton councillor Norma Hart.

Cllr Wheeler, who will officially take over as finance leader later this week, did not return calls from the Evening News to explain his expenses, though it is thought he has attended a number of conferences over the last year.

The city's economic development leader, Tom Buchanan, claimed the second highest expenses, and the highest subsistence expenses, but he today said it was part of his role of selling Edinburgh to inward investors.

He said: "I know myself and my colleagues do our best to keep these costs down but I have been on a number of trips, including ones overseas, in the capacity of selling this city to inward investors and I need to be contactable throughout this."

In 2007-8 Edinburgh councillors claimed £57,230 for travel, food, mobile calls and other expenses.

The majority of expenses went on travel costs as councillors are allowed to claim for travel to and from home when on official business.

Including salaries and expenses, the city's councillors cost about £1.2 million every year.

Deputy council leader Steve Cardownie, who claimed £2,455 in 2008-9, including a trip to Contalmaison in France for a war memorial ceremony, said: "I have no qualms about the expenses I've claimed.

"I think overall we give good value – there is certainly nobody who gets into local government for the salaries or expenses.

"I think councillors know they need to get the most value for the taxpayers and our claims are very well scrutinised by the officials.

"There is room for improvement though, items like conference fees can skew people's expense figures and I think opening up to full transparency will address this."

Latest salary details also reveal that city leader Jenny Dawe took home an income of £47,516 last year. This is up £5,000 from the previous year but the 2007-8 figures included one month's salary where she was not in charge of the council, as the elections were held in May 2007.

Alistair Paisley made the highest claim for travel, at £961 for the year, as well as the highest phone and IT claims at £412, but the Tory councillor said it was justified, given the size of his ward and committee commitments.

He said: "I am never away from this place and this is reflected in my expenses claims."

One of the most frugal councillors was Lib Dem Portobello councillor Stephen Hawkins. He only claimed £131, which was for subsistence costs while on a training course.

He explained: "It's probably one of those things as I work in Livingston but live in Portobello so the City Chambers is on my way to and from work. My employer provides me with a car so I don't feel the need to make a claim.

"Plus as one of the backbenchers there really isn't any need for me to claim much else."

The latest expenses details come as councillors are expected this week to approve moves to publish a breakdown of their claims for the first time.

The system will be similar to that used by the Scottish Parliament. Details will be published quarterly on the council website.

Councillor Cameron Rose, who has put a motion to Thursday's full council meeting calling for changes to the expenses system, and who himself claimed just £240 last year, said: "I think the expenses paid out are quite reasonable at the moment but in making it fully transparent we are making sure there is a system in place in five years' time that still works.

"I think there are areas of uncertainly in the system, such as the claiming of conference fees, where we need clarification but overall it is not in bad shape."

Forth Tory councillor Allan Jackson, who claimed just £349 for telephone and IT expenses last year, added: "It is obviously good news that the expenses bills are coming down. The basic wage for councillors has been gradually coming up so people might not feel the need to put things on expenses like they used to.

"And the taxi expenses stories of the last few years will have sharpened the minds of a few people in terms of what they claim for."

PLAYING BY THE RULES
DUCK islands, moat cleaning services and adult films are unlikely to be appearing on a city councillor's expense claim sheet any time soon.

The rules governing the city's 58 elected members' allowances and expenses are fairly tight and do not leave the door open for any Westminster-style payouts.

All councillors can claim for travel expenses for meetings or work both in their wards and at council offices as long as they are on council business.

Although all councillors are entitled to a free annual Lothian Buses pass, they can also claim up to 40p a mile in mileage payments, or taxi fares where it can be shown there was no viable transport alternative. If representing the council on business at meetings or conferences away from the Capital, councillors can claim up to £94.11 a night for accommodation and meal costs.

Train or flight costs are also met by the council, though – as was illustrated when Lord Provost George Grubb was intending to visit India last year – there are no official rules on whether councillors should travel first or second class.

Councillors can also claim back the cost of calls on council-issued mobile phones, as well as the cost of accessing the internet or e-mail on these phones.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 26/05/2009 13:25:14
Just goes to show what happens when you lift stones and shine bright lights into murky corners - all manner of nasty, slimy creatures slither, scuttle and wriggle for cover! Then they keep their heads down.
2

Pantaloon,

W Lothian 26/05/2009 13:51:59
They're all the same.
3

Edinburgh Writer,

26/05/2009 14:00:12
It's a nonsense that training courses and conferences are counted towards councillors' personal expenses. We need councillors to learn how to do their jobs and to be informed about best practice, but they will be discouraged from doing so if they think it will lead to them being accused of lining their own pockets.
4

Skip McClendon,

26/05/2009 14:06:29
If we factor in the trams, they all still owe us a fair few quid...
5

Edinburgh Writer,

26/05/2009 14:08:40
In the linked table of expenses, the Evening News adds together councillors' salaries and expenses. This is disingenuous. The council paying £100 for a conference fee so that a councillor can attend as part of their job is very different to the council paying £100 of salary to a councillor which they can spend on anything they like, and it is misleading to add the two together. It gives the impression that councillors are personally gaining much more than they actually are.

Hmmm... that couldn't be why the Evening News did it - could it? Surely they wouldn't try to mislead their readers in that way.
6

sceptic,

livingston 26/05/2009 14:31:27
A modicum of congratulations to most of the councillors. Whether under duress or not the expenses claimed are reasonable. Let us go forward without expenses again getting out of hand.
7

Glenda,

blah 26/05/2009 16:13:37
Even though Councillor Ian Perry didn't claim much in the way of expenses in the past year, he wouldn't be short of a bob or two since he's already been paid £400,000 pounds over a 10 year for a non-existant job - doing nowt.

http://www.edinburghsucks.com/categories/councillor/ian-perry/

http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/edinburgh/Councillor-in-inquiry-over-undeclared.3588073.jp

The original culprit.....yet the Standards Commission weren't able to find him guilty of anything. Wonder if they'd be more disposed to investigate in a more 'thorough' manner in the current climate?


8

Glenda,

blah 26/05/2009 16:23:09
whoops....I meant,

"£400,000 pounds over a 10 year period for a non-existent job - doing nowt".
9

blackley,

Edinburgh 26/05/2009 16:30:52
You're a good man, Wheeler. Keep it up!
10

For Scotlands Future,

26/05/2009 16:36:38
"In stark contrast to the claims at Westminster, the annual table reveals local politicians claimed £49,958 for travel, food and other expenses in 2008-9 – nearly half the total of three years ago"

Now, lets remember - who was in power in ECC three years ago???

Gee. What a surprise.
11

Logie Almond,

26/05/2009 17:08:51
The reason expenses have gone down is nothing to do with changes in political control or Evening news campaigns. It is simply because the way councillors are paid changed in 2007 with the new electoral system. Councillors were paid a basic salary of £7000, plus subsistence if they were on council business for more than four hours. Now they are paid £15000 but without any subsistence unless they are staying away from home on council business. Simple really.
12

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 26/05/2009 17:58:49
Nah,scotlands politicians are squeeky clean,surely,are they not.
13

The faithful=,

Gracemount 28/05/2009 12:46:15
Have to say Cllr Hart has been working her wee socks of in Gracemount over the last 4 months,she has attended many meetings and got a lot of people doing jobs they should have been doing all along.
"God did i just defend a cllr"
14

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

05/06/2009 13:13:21
Even before Tom Buchanan got voted in on an SNP ticket, he was hopelessly out of his depth in all things remotely connected to the most basic positions of management skills, yet he has been hoisted upon us as Edinburgh's best choice for the prime post of the city's economic developer - why ?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Are unions right to fight the possible privatisation of council services?
Yes, they’ve got a right to protect their jobs
Yes, services will suffer if outsourced
No, the private sector will run things more efficiently

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.