Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Anger at NHS targets set for drug addicts

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 May 2009
DRUG addicts will be promised faster treatment than cancer patients under controversial new government targets last night dismissed as "bizarre".
Community safety minister Fergus Ewing will for the first time introduce waiting times for treatment for addicts, with the target of a three-week maximum wait within five years.

But cancer patients have only been promised a maximum wait of 31 days
, leading to claims the government has got its priorities wrong. Ewing made his announcement amid growing pressure on the NHS from drug addicts not on treatment programmes. Some heroin and cocaine users must wait up to a year before they can be referred for expert help.

Ewing, writing in Scotland on Sunday, said: "I am very conscious that, in England, there is a three-week waiting time standard, from referral to treatment and that this has been achieved within five years of the introduction of a target.

"And while highly ambitious, I see no reason why, in time, a three-week waiting time standard should not be our aspiration in Scotland, too."

Scotland has about 52,000 drug addicts, the vast majority of whom are addicted to heroin although there are rising numbers of cocaine addicts. The cost of treatment is about £85 million a year. The most common treatment is methadone, with about 20,000 people taking the heroin substitute at an annual cost of £25m.

However, critics say this method of treatment fails to wean users of their habit. Other treatments include residential detox or counselling services. However, a lack of evidence means it is unclear how successful many treatments are.

The thrust of the SNP's drug strategy is a push towards recovery programmes rather than simply managing addiction.

The waiting-time target is likely to be set at a more modest figure in November and will become compulsory in April 2010. Waiting times vary dramatically around the country with some areas able to get addicts to treatment in three weeks and with some struggling to get help for patients for up to a year.

A spokesman for Ewing stressed faster treatment for drug users was good for everyone – not just addicts. He said: "For every £1 invested in treatment services, an estimated £9.50 is saved to wider society in terms of further potential costs through the criminal justice system, health service and economy."

But critics voiced anger at the move. Mark Wallace, of the Taxpayers' Alliance, said: "These proposals show a bizarre set of priorities. Of course people with drug problems should be treated, but those with life-threatening illnesses like cancer should come higher up the list."

Margaret Watt, chairwoman of the Scotland Patients' Association, said: "We have been advocating drug treatment targets for addicts …but if they can be treated within three weeks, our cancer patients should be treated within one week. Drug addiction is an inflicted illness and cancer is not."

On the road to recovery

A year ago, I launched The Road to Recovery - Scotland's first drugs strategy since devolution.

Tomorrow at Edinburgh Castle I will meet many of those who have helped to implement the strategy, including people in recovery from their addiction. It's absolutely clear that wanting to change is key to recovery from addiction.

Often there is a trigger point - the birth of a child, the death of a loved one - that leads them to want to change and give up drugs.

Help must be available at that moment of greatest motivation. In too many parts of Scotland people face many months for treatment, while others wait just a few weeks.

We have agreed with the NHS that waiting times for drug treatment services will be reduced.

In November we will announce the first performance target for drug treatment, which will commence from April 2010.

We are in discussion with key stakeholders to establish just how ambitious this target can be. I expect that NHS boards, local authorities and voluntary sector partners will work in concert to achieve this.

I am conscious that, in England, there is a three-week waiting time standard, from referral to treatment and that this has been achieved within five years of the introduction of a target.

And while highly ambitious, I see no reason why, in time, a three-week waiting time standard should not be our aspiration in Scotland too.

Scotland's skilled health professionals have made great progress in reducing waiting times for other treatment services, including cancer. It is now essential that we do the same for drug treatment services.

Fergus Ewing, Minister for Community Safety



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 May 2009 7:09 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Drugs policy
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 31/05/2009 02:12:42

"Often there is a trigger point - the birth of a child, the death of a loved one - that leads them to want to",????
I think that if we Knew the 'trigger points', we may be able to prevent drug abuse in the first instance.
Many a negative "trigger point", comes down to mental health issues, to-which we have 'waiting times' to get help, to-which are far-too-long!


2

ZipptJeffrey,

Castle 31/05/2009 08:34:57
The sole purpose of NHS policy in Scotland over the last thirty years has been to socially engineer the increase of drug addicts. You just have to look at the methadone program in Glasgow which has SUSTAINED the illegal drugs trade in Glasgow and the west of scotland.

Either we legalise all drugs and and let the private secotor make money out of this misery and give the government a serious tax boost or we go Nazi and stop funding methadone has a treatment, cause its not working.
3

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 31/05/2009 10:19:24
"Wanting to change" is key factor in recovery from addiction. Absolutely.

Someone suffering from cancer or other serious ailment has no such choice. Since drug abuse shows no signs of abating there does not seem to be much need for change and nor is there any sign that methadone or other initiatives have worked to any significant degree. The prospect of being off benefits and doing some hard labour on the other hand could produce miracles.

If your reward failure you get more - simple.
4

W Smith,

Middle East 31/05/2009 10:22:44
In Singapore they have a very effective "trigger point".

Its when the druggie reads about the drug dealer that was hanged the day before in Changi prison.

I doubt if Singapore has as many as 52,000 drug addicts despite having similare size population.

Singapore is also around 2-3 hours flying from the Golden Triangle, Thailand-Burma border area, where most of the opium in that region comes from.

Good to see the Scottish drug dealers have overcome the logistical problems in supplying druggies with heroin despite being farther away from the source than Singapore, eh Fergus?

The Singapore government would rather spend 85 million quid on their infrastructure and make jail compulsory for the druggie.

I know, I know its too 'right wing' for the Scots but don't say theres no solution.

BTW
My missus used to work with drug addicts who were being ..eh .. um ..(cough) .."treated" with methadone.

I got to know some of the poor souls and every one of them died before reaching their 40th birthday.

Something Fergus Ewing doesn't want to talk about.
5

The Ayrshire Bard,

31/05/2009 10:39:15
It was around the mid 60's when I attended a meeting in which the speaker was trying to persuade us that Edinburgh would soon have a drug problem greater than that of London. How we scoffed...Edinburgh...where the pubs shut at 10.00pm and the streets were deserted by 11. We'd never heard of drugs in Edinburgh and there was no way it was going to happen. How wrong we were!!
6

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 31/05/2009 18:29:16
drug addicts are self inflicted ,draining health cash,cancer can strike anyone,rich or poor,you get no choice like drugs,yes or no,cancer strikes and an examination is done,core samples taken for pathology ,when confirmed,a program is then worked out and chemo or radio treatment then is started
i lost both parents to cancer,my dad had lung cancer,my mother got the silent killer-pancreatic cancer,which doesnt show like breast cancer,and its not as treatable as breast or other types of cancer
yes a good point why should someone who self inflicts drug addiction,get extra cash?,when people with cancer have to wait to see if its terminal
breast cancer patients dont normaly get DLA as some civil servant pointed out that large percentages were getting better from chemo,and radiation treatments
yet arrive here from somewhere else and they give you plenty,hamza the hook gets DLA,and hes bought houses etc ,yet he spouts death to those who give him the cash
you dont see cancer victims wishing death and destruction on anyone

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should needles continue to be handed out to drug addicts?
Yes, it’s better than re-using old needles
Yes, but only if used needles are returned
No, this just keeps addicts hooked on drugs


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.