Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Whistle blows on illegal pub TV

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
28 October 2007
TELEVISION and football chiefs have launched a crackdown on hundreds of Scottish pubs and clubs who draw in huge crowds by showing major games without paying a penny to the broadcasters.
A joint investigation involving Sky TV, Setanta, the English premiership and the SPL, whose games are only shown on Setanta, has already exposed 180 venues north of the Border that are showing matches while dodging fees of up to £15,000 a year. Inves
tigators estimate that around 40% of pubs and clubs that show live games are breaking the law, costing Sky, Setanta and the football authorities at least £3m a year in lost revenue. Law breakers were last night warned to stop or face the prospect of legal action.

The latest deal with the English premiership cost Sky and Setanta £1.7bn, and the money is seen as vital for the grassroots game across the UK. But bars have easily got round the copyright laws by using domestic set-top boxes, foreign satellite channels and even getting games over the internet.

Takings on a big football Saturday for a typical pub on the outskirts of Glasgow are likely to hit around £6,000 if the match is being shown live. On a normal Saturday, without football, that could drop to just £2,500. Most venues can expect takings to be boosted by at least 75% by televised football.

Last week, representatives of the SPL and premiership met with the Scottish Licensed Trade Association to discuss the extent of the problem and how to crack down on it.

Since the start of the season in August, Sky representatives have visited 450 pubs from Aberdeen to Lanarkshire, and Inverness to Glasgow and Edinburgh. It is estimated that by next May around 2,000 bars will have been checked out by the 'spotters'.

According to one Sky source, a "significant number" of those premises were found to be flouting the rules.

Those offenders will be revisited and warned to become legal. Otherwise they will face the threat of legal action and an order for substantial costs.

South of the Border, the crackdown has already roped in one high-profile landlord earlier this month. John Morrey, the uncle of England footballer Wayne Rooney, was fined £4,000 for showing Sky Sports matches illegally at his Liverpool pub.

Greig Mailer, a spokesman for the SPL, said the clampdown was vital to guarantee the future of the domestic game in Scotland. He added: "We have to protect participation in our national game, whether that be playing, coaching or watching.

"And on a Saturday afternoon we have established a 'closed window', where live games are not broadcast in order to do this. We are working very closely with the English premiership to work out how best to tackle this problem.

"We have worked on this issue of illegal reception in pubs and clubs for some time, and we have people out and about every week, monitoring pubs and collecting information.

"Already we have had a number of civil actions and have had interdicts issued against several premises." Earlier this month, an interim interdict was issued against the licensee of one Scottish pub to prevent her from showing games illegally.

Justine Thomson, who runs The Mallard in Perth, had been showing football broadcast by Doha-based channel al-Jazeera before being caught. Lord Glennie, sitting at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, agreed to an SPL request for the order.

A spokesman for the the SPL said: "The owners of The Mallard, as well as any other pubs that are illegally showing football matches, are in violation of the law and damaging the League itself.

"It is our intention to seek costs and an account of profits following this decision. We will take action wherever necessary to combat copyright theft."

Dennis O'Keefe, from McPhabbs bar in Glasgow's west end, pays around £13,500 every year to broadcast top English and Scottish games.

He said: "It is a lot to pay, especially as it is just for an eight-month contract, but our customers want to watch the best matches in our pub. We show the Scottish, English and Spanish football, as well as the international games and all other types of sport, and it does prove very popular."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 October 2007 5:54 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: BskyB , Digital broadcasting
 
1

,

28/10/2007 02:24:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

tomi,

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 28/10/2007 04:02:36

Oh! What a shame! Rip-off merchants such as Setanta loose some of their excessive profits! Too Bad!

3

49th State,

Our house in the middle of the street 28/10/2007 05:30:49

Wow, pay the cable bill here and you can show your TV show to who ever you want. Its so Big Brother over there!

4

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta, CA vote Hillary Clinton... US Pres. 28/10/2007 06:11:40

Whistle blows on illegal pub TV
----------------------------------------

Yet another reason why an Independent Scotland will fail.

Mass corruption and greed expands, when there is no Westminister to stop it.

GC

5

Guga II,

Rockall 28/10/2007 07:18:07

How, exactly, is it illegal to show a game broadcast, presumably quite legally, on foreign satellite channels?

How, exactly, is a "clampdown.....vital to guarantee the future of the domestic game in Scotland", especially when they are only showing foreign games?

The whole thing sounds like a stitch-up by YUK broadcasters to try and keep everything under their total control, and to make sure that only they can profit from it.

6

Paul Voltaire,

28/10/2007 09:09:45

The world's smallest violin is currently playing for Sky and Setanta.

7

carrottop,

Dumfries 28/10/2007 09:17:03

The expense of football whether on TV or entry to the grounds is driving people away from a sport that everyone used to have an interest in or opinion about, the speel about the money being needed for grass roots soccer doesnt hold up if not so many youngsters are interested or attracted to the game by regular exposure to quality football on the telly or at the local stadium, this reasoning could also be applied to adults. Not everyone is rich.

8

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 28/10/2007 10:01:03

If the pubs are making profits from the showing of these matches, why should they not pay like other pubs that DO pay the fees?

There is freedom of expression and thumbing the powers that be, but here I feel that pubs should pay the fee for increased custom and the profits than ensue.

9

Jake in Perth,

Perth Scotland 28/10/2007 12:36:02

Oh dear oh dear !!!!!!!!! does Murdoch now own the SOS ?. I have never ever read a piece so badly skewed and unbalanced in its reporting as this . It is a shameful tabloid piece written by someone, who on his past track record is capable of much more. I will not rake over all the details again as #1 has covered most them, except to say when you have a pub which has a turnover of 110K per annum which included sky, generating gross profit of 55K less staff, utilities,insurance and Sky were asking £350 per month and it goes up to £575 per month !!! as our Nth American friends would say "Do the maths". Until Elias revisits this issue with a more realistic view on the Sky situation then i'll be a Herald reader from now on . J

10

Sassenach Observer,

Edinburgh 28/10/2007 14:02:31

Just a few points:

a. #1 - Sky doesn't own Setanta.

b. #5 Al Jazeera and others are only licensed to show matches within a specified geographical area.

c. #7 The expense of watching football essentially arises from the massive wage bills and transfer fees.

The pubs are acting illegally by either using domestic Sky cards or obtaining the matches from unlicensed sources.

Sky /Setanta charge what they do in order to make a profit having paid English Premiership /SPL whatever it cost at auction.

The leagues auction off brodcasting rights in order to maximise their income and essentially represent the individual clubs who want as much money as they can get in order to pay the massive wage bills and transfer fees which are necessary to get world class players.

If you don't like the way it all works, why not just watch Sunday league football instead ?

11

Toast,

28/10/2007 15:09:50

Sky's greed is legendary,if the premiership was any good it would be an outragous price but for the rubbish defensive football it is it is a joke,there are only 4/5 teams worth watching,wouldn't waste my money.

12

Mallory,

28/10/2007 15:11:05

Don't these greedy publicans realise that they are preventing Mr Murdoch et al from handing over large sums to footballers agents?

13

,

28/10/2007 19:42:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Conan the Librarian™,

28/10/2007 20:45:26

Archie

£2.30 for a pint...:-)

Try living in Edinburgh £2.75... :-(

15

BK,

Cyberspace 28/10/2007 23:49:29

Sky, Setanta and Football are just money grabbing organisations, who deserve all the piracy they get. Good luck to anyone who fights back against these greedy monsters.

16

,

28/10/2007 23:56:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1095899, Article id was mapped to record!
17

,

29/10/2007 00:21:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

,

29/10/2007 00:22:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

jonny gers,

glasgow 29/10/2007 00:59:39

Archie what the helk have you been smoking and can I buy some off you.

20

ConcernedParent,

29/10/2007 09:07:08

Aw my heart bleeds for Sky..they must be feeling the pinch. Little wonder some pubs dont pay the fees..what a rip off!

The heart & soul of football has been destroyed by these a**holes. I'm not sure how yer local pub showing a game can damage the "grassroots" either. What we need are less overpaid tossers on the pitch.

Give THAT money back to the game.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.