Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Independence ballot 'may include Calman proposals'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 June 2009
AN OPTION to increase the Scottish Parliament's devolved powers may be included in an independence referendum, First Minister Alex Salmond said today.
There is a "willingness" to put a question on the ballot paper covering proposals put forward yesterday by the Calman Commission, Mr Salmond said.

The commission called for Holyrood to have greater powers over income tax.

And the commission – s
et up by Labour, Tories and the Liberal Democrats to look at the future of devolution – recommended giving the Parliament power over legislation such as drink-driving limits and airguns.

Today Mr Salmond said the Calman Report was "fundamentally weak and flawed in a number of areas".

But he said the public may be given the chance to vote for its proposals – or his preferred option of independence – in a referendum.

"We are going to put forward our case, our question, our option," he said.

"If Calman is the option of the unionist parties then let's have that on the ballot paper, if they're prepared to support a referendum.

"If, as a price of allowing the Scottish people to decide, that both options have to be presented to get the Parliament to allow the people to determine in a referendum their own future, then I'm perfectly happy to have both options on the ballot paper."

Mr Salmond added: "We have a willingness to put a question – another question on the Calman proposals – onto that ballot paper so no one can say their option has been excluded or neglected, and then take it to the people of Scotland and abide by sovereign decision of the only jury that really matters in this country, that's the people of Scotland."

He made the comments at a public meeting held for the Scottish Government's national conversation – an initiative launched in 2007 aimed at stimulating widespread debate on Scotland's constitutional future.

About 170 people attended the meeting in Livingston, West Lothian, this morning.

Mr Salmond announced that his administration will publish on St Andrew's Day – November 30 – "what we've taken out of the national conversation and the framework on which we believe a referendum should be offered to the people of Scotland next year".

A number of policy papers will also be released in the lead-up to this publication.

Mr Salmond told the audience that Scotland is now "moving to a decision".

However opposition parties dismissed the idea of Calman's proposals being included in a referendum.

Labour said this was a "red herring", with a party spokesman saying: "Whenever the SNP are in trouble they suggest a referendum.

They have been running around like headless chickens in their response to Calman.

"Labour has said all along that Alex Salmond's proposal for a referendum is based on a rigged question. It is not a straight choice.

"Labour leader Iain Gray has also pointed out Calman does not need a referendum as it's not about changing the constitutional relationship between Scotland and the rest of the UK. It is an extension of the devolution process.

"Labour, the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives agree Calman has to be taken forward quickly."

Tory leader Annabel Goldie said: "This is a cynical attempt by the SNP to play politics with the serious recommendations from the Calman Commission.

"Alex Salmond is clearly worried by the proposals outlined in the report. He knows that independence would not get majority support and he is trying to muddy the waters.

"Having once rubbished Calman and refused to take part, his conversion is nothing more than cynical opportunism.

"Unlike Mr Salmond our position remains unchanged – we will not support Salmond's Referendum Bill."

And a Liberal Democrat spokeswoman said: "We want to deliver real progress. It's surprising that the SNP wants to delay change in this way.

"As no political party opposes Calman, putting it to a referendum would be a pointless waste of taxpayers' time and money that would be better spent getting on with building schools and hospitals."



Page 1 of 1

 
1

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 16/06/2009 15:41:20
I disagree with this. The referendum should be a straight yes or no.
2

frank mcbride,

lusitania 16/06/2009 16:09:15
A strange comment fro the LD spokesperson, "As no political Party opposes Calman,.............".

Has AS not condemned it as "weak and flawed........"?

As for, "no need for a Referendum", why is this when a second question on tax-raising powers was required in the the original Referendum?

When the Party political manoeuverings of the Unionist Alliance are pointed out to the people of Scotland, those same Unionist may wish they had never set Calman up.
How many things that were supposed to be impossible are now, miraculously, doable?
3

Marga,

Edinburgh 16/06/2009 16:11:54
Alex Salmond, I think you've put the cat among the pigeons. Again. And Calman was supposed to upset the SNP not Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition ...
4

BIG EYE,

Paisley 16/06/2009 16:17:28
Labour are becoming increasingly appalling.

Surely the line "Everytime the SNP are in trouble they want a referendum" is the weakest argument yet.

How can you be "in trouble" if you are willing to risk all and let the people decide?

More accurate would be "the Unionists are in desperate trouble and daren't let the people choose"

It just amazes me that they seem to believe this approach won't result in electoral disaster for them.

Labour...dont U just luv them?
5

BIG EYE,

Paisley 16/06/2009 16:21:16
It has always been the dream of nationalists to package all the unionists parties into the one scheme to defend the union that could then be placed directly against Independence.

Calman has delivered the package let the unravelling begin!
6

letmein,

hinterland 16/06/2009 17:06:23
Well said big eye. Isnt it great watching them squirm, they have all but delivered independence for us.
Thank you Calman, and I thought your report would be rubbish. By By labiur and the rest.
7

karin Mac,

16/06/2009 17:37:10
this is most strange. Im sure we all remember the unionist parties insisting that the tax raising powers question pre devolution had to go to a referendum and HAD to be posed as a seperate question. Yet now we are supposed to beleive that no referendum is needed surely the same rules apply then as now. If not whey not?
8

Eve,

Scotland 16/06/2009 17:42:02
#1 connaughtboy: The unionists will never allow it!

My only hope is when we eventually get to vote, that beside the Pro-independence box it says "For Scottish independence" Written in brackets so I know that I've voted for the right one.

Cause I just know that their going to try and word it funny!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

What should be done to cut down on food waste at the Scottish Parliament?
They should give it out to homeless charities
Open the MSPs’ restaurant up to the public
They should reduce the number of items on the menu


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.