Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Half a century in grip of Castro's vision

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 January 2009
FIFTY years ago today Fidel Castro finally led his band of rebels to victory over Fulgencio Batista, the US-backed dictator who ran Cuba, and in doing so became one of the most revered, hated and always-controversial figures of the modern era.
Despite five decades of unstinting opposition and an economic embargo from the nearby United States, the revolution he started goes on with Cuba firmly in its grip, in what some view as a triumph and others a tragedy.

Castro, 32 when he took power
on 1 January, 1959, has become a sick old man; companions such as fellow revolutionary Ernesto "Che" Guevara are long dead; and communism has almost vanished around the world.

In February, Cuba managed a smooth succession of power when Raul Castro, 77, officially replaced his older brother as president. Fidel, now 82, has not been seen in public since undergoing intestinal surgery in July 2006, but he is still thought to wield considerable power.

He and his rebels were greeted by ecstatic crowds when they rolled into Havana after chasing Batista from power. But the euphoria faded as Castro and the US – only 90 miles away – became locked in a Cold War showdown as, allied with the Soviet Union, he imposed communism on Cuba.

The bitterness generated in those early years never went away as Castro opponents fled to Miami, unsuccessfully plotted his demise and waited in vain for the US trade embargo against the island to topple him.

Cubans remain divided on whether it has all been worth it.

"History will absolve me," Castro said in a 1953 courtroom speech as Batista tried to jail him, but there is little agreement on his legacy.

For supporters, Castro threw off the yoke of tyranny and brought economic justice and benefits such as free education and health care for all.

Opponents say he simply imposed a new dictatorship that impoverished a once-prosperous nation and robbed its people of opportunities.

Almost everyone chafes at monthly salaries that average $20. Government food rations meet part of their dietary needs, but many Cubans participate in a thriving black market to make ends meet.

"I can't live on my salary … I have to 'invent' because it can't be done," said teacher Pedro Perez, using a Cuban term for bending the rules to survive.

"Fifty years in this struggle and there's no progress," said 46-year-old security guard Gabriel Mata as he took a break under a tree in Havana's Vedado district. "We see other countries advancing, but not ours. There just aren't any options here."

Others say Cuba is a better place that will keep improving. "People don't remember what Cuba was before the revolution. It was sold out to the US and the poor had no opportunities," said a 61-year-old public employee who gave his name only as Robert. "The revolution brought equality of opportunity."

The support of many people like him and a strong security apparatus are two reasons the revolution looks solidly in place. Only a small number of dissidents speak out publicly, and 200 of them have been jailed. The government views dissidents as mercenaries working for the US.

Most Cubans who are unhappy with the government shrug their shoulders as if to say "why bother?" when asked why there is not more dissent. The better option, some say, is to leave the country, as at least one million Cubans have since 1959.

The inefficiencies of a centrally planned economy, lack of incentive for greater productivity and a general malaise surrounding the ageing revolution have held back the economy. A taxi driver, discussing the pluses and minuses of modern Cuba as he wound through Havana's uncrowded streets, summed it up: "The great thing about this country is that if you don't want to work, you don't have to."

The government places much of the blame for the country's woes on the US embargo, imposed in 1962 in hopes of strangling the economy and bringing down Castro. But critics say Castro's pursuit of social equality turned one of Latin America's most prosperous nations into a basket case dependent on benefactor countries like the Soviet Union before its 1991 collapse, and now oil-rich Venezuela.

"They dealt with inequality by making all the people poor," said Frank Mora at the National War College in Washington.

Fidel Castro makes no apologies for what Cuba has become, saying it was required because the fight for socialism is ultimately against an opponent more formidable than any one man or country.

"In the hard battle for those objectives, the worst enemy is the selfish instinct of the human being," he said recently in a newspaper column. "If capitalism means the constant utilisation of that instinct, socialism is the incessant battle against such natural tendency."

Many Cubans were excited about the prospect for change when the more pragmatic Raul Castro took power and instituted reforms that allowed them for the first time to buy computers, mobile phones and DVD players and to go to hotels and stores previously open only to foreigners. Since then, most reforms have come to a halt for reasons no-one outside the government really understands.

Some Cubans now say their best hope for change may come from the US, where President-elect Barack Obama has promised to ease the embargo and possibly pursue talks with Cuba.

FACT BOX

As Cuba prepares to mark the 50th anniversary of the revolution that put Fidel Castro in power on 1 January 1959, its people say they struggle to survive on low salaries.

Here are some facts about Cuban society:

• Cuba has a population of 11.2 million.

• Cuba's government says the average Cuban per capita income is $6,000 a year, including social benefits such as free health care and education and a subsidised monthly food ration.

• Cubans earn on average about $20 a month and many augment their salaries or make them go further by buying or selling on the black market where goods, often stolen, are cheaper than in state-run stores.

• Cuba's life expectancy is 77.9 years, just behind the United States at 78 years.

• Cuba has a 99.8 per cent literacy rate, second only to the nation of Georgia, which has 100 per cent, according to the UN Human Development Report.

Timeline of a revolution

1 January 1959 – US-backed dictator Fulgencio Batista flees as Fidel Castro's revolutionaries take control.

3 January 1961 – US breaks off diplomatic relations after nationalisation of US-owned properties.

17 April 1961 – Bay of Pigs invasion by exiles backed by the CIA defeated.

7 February 1962 – US imposes embargo on Cuba.

October 1962 – Soviet Union backs down in confrontation with US over missiles on Cuba.

April-Oct 1980 – Cuba allows 125,000 people to travel to the US in Mariel Boatlift.

December 1991 – Collapse of Soviet Union, Cuba's biggest benefactor, sparks economic crisis from which the island has not fully recovered.

August-September 1994 – More than 35,000 people leave for US in fragile boats.

January 1998 – Pope John Paul II visits Cuba.

31 July 2006 – Fidel Castro provisionally turns over power to brother Raul Castro after emergency intestinal surgery.

24 February 2008 – Raul Castro is elected president by National Assembly, formally replacing Fidel.









Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 December 2008 10:29 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Cuba
 
1

Mashimaro,

China 01/01/2009 01:20:00
I wonder how different things would have been if it had not been US policy to destroy all things communist.
2

2dogs in D.C.,

01/01/2009 03:19:33
Mashi-Sometimes I do agree with you.This whole ridiculous mess could have been avoided with the simple act of tourism. (Not,mind you,that I enjoy a good cigar.)
3

,

01/01/2009 03:39:49
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

,

01/01/2009 03:40:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

2dogs in D.C.,

01/01/2009 03:52:50
Rufus-medicate as soon as possible.The world requires your services.This is of the utmost importance,and most top secret.
6

Mashimaro,

China 01/01/2009 06:46:21
#2 Ar-gow in retrospect war is never worth it. You have to be there at the time. But it was more than tourism the US shut off for Cuba. It was trade, and that did a mighty amount of damage.
7

James Donald,

Newbridge 01/01/2009 07:48:38
#1 Mashimaro,Red China - Yes, the Poles should never have stopped the Red Army on the Vistula and that would have given Communism a chance to flourish and spread death and misery to s desperate World.
Sad that there are still individuals who advocate this discredited system in the modern world.
8

gus1940,

Edinburgh 01/01/2009 09:06:30
I hope President Obama will scrap the infantile US embargo on Cuba.

If he does, The US will have embarked on the long journey to becoming a mature nation worthy of international respect.
9

,

01/01/2009 11:29:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

Mashimaro,

01/01/2009 12:22:51
#7 Yeah but Jimmy Dee as we have all learned, you don't count.
#9 Schot... what?
11

Schot,

01/01/2009 12:37:39
Mashimaro,
You said you support the slaughter of Chinese citizens in Tiananmen. Most folk here dinnae - in fact it is just you so far. It's been almost a century since the British government sent tanks against protestors in Glasgow. We've moved on. Nowadays we just get beaten up, arrested and blacklisted. It's an improvement we owe to our ancestors struggle against our 'leaders'.

So you claimed you often criticise your own leaders - prove it.
12

James Donald,

Newbridge 01/01/2009 13:42:31
#10 Mashimaro - Tut, tut Zippy, the Royal "We" again. I thought your Commissar would have "re-educated" that nonsense out of you. Little yellow peril with a big ego advocatiing an outdated, discredited and murderous political system all but consigned to the dustbin of history. Now there is an opinion that doesn't count.
13

2dogs in D.C.,

01/01/2009 13:47:04
Gus-I do hope you're right.Always seemed almost juvenile how the U.S. has acted with Cuba.
14

James Donald,

Newbridge 01/01/2009 13:51:24
#11 Schot - I fear that your wait for Zippy to criticise the leaders of the workers' paradise will be in vain. He might voice some (very) mild criticism of local party bigwigs (much as "Das Schwarze Korps" did of the excesses of local NSDAP officials in the 1930s) but he wil never criticise the national leadership. He knows what the consequenses are.
15

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 01/01/2009 18:22:20
World leaders like Churchill, Hitler, Stalin were put in place to dupe the people and start the next world war. They had no talents apart from indolence, vice, paranoia and magalomania in front of the microphone (like Churchill when half-way sober).

Castro did his small time thing.

But it's bankers that rule the world, own the media and the politicians (that they train for Bilderburg, the G8 summits and other big tent circuses). Tavish Scott, have you been called? I don't think so.

Independent Scotland is the planet's last hope.

"They only have to vote for it."

Who said that?

16

Itchy,

01/01/2009 20:11:23
#1 Communism is totalitarian and genocidal.

17

Itchy,

01/01/2009 20:13:40
#15 Your post is conspiracy theory drivel and imagine comparing Hitler to Churchill.

#13 Awww! The poor commies. They have been so poorly treated by the big capitalist bullies and other Marxist cliches.
18

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 01/01/2009 20:50:05
Hitler turned Germany round from the aftermath of WW1. Well, he was the figurhead. Whereas Churchill was complicit in batton charching hunger strikers on british towns. (before his mysterious years in the wilderness which was part of the Hitler problem too).

Anyhow, Stalin took up the spoils of WW2 (eastern europe and the united nations) despite real heroes like General Patton who got KILLED.
19

Mashimaro,

China 02/01/2009 01:38:49
#11 Groundhog day again...
What do you know about Tiananmen? eh? Do you know any more than Jimmy Dee? I doubt it.
20

James Donald,

Newbridge 02/01/2009 07:56:55
#19 Mashimaro,Red China - There are several eyewitness accounts on this site, Zippy but be warned they may conflict with your official CCP version (so you may not be allowed to view these if your Government does not allow it):
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB16/documents/index.html#d30
Here also are nice nice photographs of some "enemies of the people:
http://cryptome.cn/tk/tiananmen-kill.htm
21

Mashimaro,

China 02/01/2009 08:33:04
Mmm, yes, cos cable from the US embassy is always absolutely truthful.
I flipped through the photographs... it is absolutely amazing that none of them prove me wrong. Like I have said to you, Jimmy Dee... no one died in Tiananmen square.
22

James Donald,

Newbridge 02/01/2009 08:59:29
#21 Mashimaro,Red China - How predictable, but a cahnge at least from "lying Western media" excuse.
You must have missed the photo with the caption "The bodies of dead civilians lie among mangled bicycles near Beijing's Tiananmen Square early June 4, 1989. Tanks and soldiers stormed the area overnight, bringing a violent end to student demonstrations for democratic reform in China" but that was from the "lying Western media" and can be dismissed, right?
It is your government that maintains the fiction that there were no deaths on Tiananmen Square itself but admits to between 200 and 300 deaths (perhaps you think it is okay if the PLA gunned down unarmed civilians in the streets surrounding the square rather than the square itself?).
I'm not trying to prove you wrong Zippy, as this would be an exercise in futility since you are naught but a little trumpet blower for the Chinese Communist government who sticks to the party line like glue.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tankman/cron/
23

Mashimaro,

China 02/01/2009 11:42:20
Jimmy... Jimmy... Jimmy...
""The bodies of dead civilians lie among mangled bicycles NEAR Beijing's Tiananmen"
Not "IN" right? Not IN Tiananmen... NEAR
And yes, that is hugely important to me. Because the moment you westerners start crying about tanks running down innocent students IN Tiananmen I know that you don't what you're talking about. All you are doing is repeating the same media rubbish that has been spewed out all these years. You haven't actually LOOKED and SEEN what happened. You just ACCEPT whatever some dumb journo like to slap you with.
Maybe you should READ some of the stuff you're posting for me to read. I can google too. Anyone can. It doesn't prove YOU know ANYTHING.
24

Mashimaro,

China 02/01/2009 11:44:42
Oh, and Jimmy, while you're at it, ask yourself why EVERYONE knows about Tiananmen, but most folks they don't know about the government massacres in Seoul and Mexico. They never yammer on and on and on about those.
Why not, eh Jimmy? why not?
25

ReadingPublic-2,

Northern Wisconsin 02/01/2009 13:23:07
Mashimaro. please expound on the Massacres in Mexico and Seoul.
26

Mashimaro,

China 02/01/2009 15:15:27
Mexico, 1968, Tlatelolco district, October 2, police opened fire into a group of peacefully protesting students. It was kept quiet because that year was the Olympics.
Seoul you can google 1980, better known as Gwangju - that was with the help of the US, by the way,
27

James Donald,

Newbridge 02/01/2009 18:17:01
#23 Mashimaro,Red China - I don't suppose it matters much to the dead if they are killed on or near the square as a bullet in the back is the same wherever you are. Besides, these dangerous "counter revolutionaries" deserved their fate at the hands of the "glorious" PLA. I prefer to believe the dumb Western journos and eyewitnesses to the massacre on the square rather than a dumb (and rather stroppy) communist one trotting out the party line.
The only reason that lick-spittle communists want to discuss massacres in other parts of the World, be it Mexico, South Korea or Gaza is to deflect attention away from their own crimes. Ain't that so Zippy?
28

Mashimaro,

China 03/01/2009 01:06:04
There was no massacre on the square Jimmy. And like I said, until you come to realise that... you know nothing. You are in no position to judge. So again, after a brief respite by your hard googling and not actually reading the things you find... you lose. You become just the frog in the well... croak...croak...croak...
29

James Donald,

Newbridge 03/01/2009 08:03:30
#28 Mashimaro,Red China - Ho, hum, Zippy, like an obedient marrionette you simply trot out the party line.
The eyewitnesses from the Western media and Chinese dissidents are all lying and it is only the Communist Party and its "dancing bear" trolls that tell the truth.
Communists lied about the Katyn massacre for over 50 years (some still do) but it remains to be seen how long Chinese Communist lie about their own crimes in 1989.
30

Schot,

05/01/2009 00:25:30
MashieTatties,
You were quite right about media censorship in the Scotsman being as bad as China. I am allowed to agree with my leaders in the Scotsmans comment section about anything but Gaza, but I am not allowed to disagree with their admin. So much for Maos 'self-criticism'. However I have other local media outlets I can contribute to uncensorsed, unlike you. Tell me again, why are you posting here again when you don't care about the opinions of Scottish people? It isn't because the RBS own a stake in your national bank is it? Your language is very American though I wouldn't hold that against you you do appear as a pastiche to anyone who speaks Scots.

You are arguing your government is okay because they slaughtered the Chinese innocents just outside of Tiannamen Square? According to the Chinese Red Cross there were 2,600 casualities. I doubt anything you say is factual but what difference does that make anyway if you don't dispute your state sent tanks to slaughter protestors. Or it is okay because other goverments we can criticise have also commited - and are committing - massacres? If I am anti-Chinese then why is my poster-boy the Chinese guy who outwitted the tank? The Peoples Liberation Army slaughtering the people - big round of applause to your uncriticisable leaders.

Newbridge is a horrid wee town much like mine, but in american jargon James just ripped you a new a-hole and I expect any Scot here could because WE CAN HAVE WEANS and you can't, by law. That means your people commit femicide, killing their female kids simply to have an heir, and that leads to your current gender imbalanced population. Meaning you and your kind are unlikely to ever even get laid. Wnkr.

The US Government and the Israeli government pay people to act as propagandists on websites, but the Chinese government probably doesn't have to. The threat of a bullet in the head is enough motivation. Like I said before, you deserve pity more than contempt, but you still

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.