Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


'The challenges require vision and decisiveness'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 August 2007
WHETHER it is Labour's fault or not, there is a growing air of crisis in the City Chambers and the mark of the ruling coalition will be the way it deals with the challenges it faces.
A massive backlash over the school closure plans, extensive cutbacks in care services, a strike over redundancies that haven't happened, a renewed bid to get the controversial Caltongate scheme through and the ongoing uncertainty over Meadowbank all
require a clarity of vision and decisiveness so that the people of Edinburgh understand the direction in which they are being taken.

Thus far, the clearest message to come out of the City Chambers is that Labour have left a terrible mess and that any unpopular decisions should be laid at the doors of Ewan Aitken and Donald Anderson. To borrow from former Tory leader David McLetchie, the coalition could be saying that "the big boys Ewan and Donald did it and ran away".

Except that they didn't run away. They were kicked out and the Lib Dems also must remember that they had the chance to work with Labour but overwhelmingly rejected that option on the basis that the public had voted to ditch them. Faced with mounting problems it may well be that some will rue the day they gave up the opportunity to retain the experience of the likes of the wily Ian Perry.

Having been unceremoniously dumped, Labour will use the benefit of its years of experience to make life uncomfortable for the new rulers, and it may well be that Labour's apparent U-turn on Meadowbank is not all that it seems. It is true that it has decided to back the coalition's aim of retaining Meadowbank, but it seems an extraordinary about-face when the financial situation has not changed. Having seen its opponents pledge to save the stadium in the run-up to the May election, the most likely interpretation of its new position is that it is quite happy to see the coalition get itself into deeper hot water as they try to explain why they are unable to honour their commitments.

With Glasgow's Commonwealth Games bid relying on the refurbishment of the Commonwealth Pool, there is perhaps a hope that the Nationalist government will come up with the cash for that part of the plan in order to save face internationally. And having been defeated on trams, maybe Kenny MacKaskill and Steve Cardownie will battle to have this election pledge honoured.

But pity the officers who spent the last three years preparing the detailed plans for sports provision across the city, only to see their hard work kicked around like the political football it has become. If there is group of council staff under pressure it is the senior officers who are caught between a demoralised workforce and bickering political leaders trying to find their feet, if not their level.

There is certainly a growing impression that Labour is only just beginning to enjoy itself in opposition and there will be ample opportunity for it to use its experience for mischief-making in the weeks and months to come.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

Colin G,

Edinburgh 22/08/2007 11:59:58

They need to scrap the tram project. They don't have the funding for it - and have written a blank cheque.

All other 'problems' pale into insignificance compared to that one.

2

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 22/08/2007 12:24:12

I doubt very much that Labour will be allowed to "enjoy itself in opposition". The public are not stupid and it knows exactly who is responsible for the absolute shambles we now face. I have no doubt that Labour will be beaten over the head with a very large stick for many years to come - and very well deserved it will be, too.

Perhaps the Evening News management should reflect upon the its position in so vehemently supporting the Labour administration and perhaps apologise to its readers for having tried to prop up an administration that has led us into crises in schools, care for the elderly (no doubt impacting on hospitals), sports facilities, refuse collection, etc.

3

Cicero,

22/08/2007 12:33:28

The previous Labour administration was living beyond its means for years and only survived fiscal meltdown by creative accountancy. Reserves were routinely raided as if there was to be no tomorrow and what should have been revenue funded items were cross-subsidised from capital funds and to raise capital they sold off property and land. These "chickens have now come home to roost".

4

Merouane,

Edinburgh 22/08/2007 12:43:52

"Whether it is Labour's fault or not..."

Yes, you'd prefer us not to dwell on that wouldn't you. Of course how the LibDem/SNP coalition deal with the situation they find themselves in is the most important thing, but we should not forget the state in which Labour have left the city's finances.

5

PaulB,

22/08/2007 12:46:36

Of course the budget deficit is the fault of the previous administration - they ran the city for years. Now they are out of office leaving others to sort out the mess. Womder what nulabur would have done had they got back into power. How much is our council tax going to rise by next year to make up for this mess. This whole debacle should be reproted to the ombudman, and if anyone is found to be to blame, they should be surcharged.

The previous administration are in no position to make mischief - they should be seriously worried.

6

Padraig,

22/08/2007 13:33:44

I can't believe that the Evening News sees any alternative to Labour being responsible for getting us into this mess - but agree that it is important for the new administration to set out on the right course and that is easily sorted. Identify any un-budgetted expenditure (like the as-yet undeclared actual cost of the trams), prioritise spending, review overheads (like weed out the non-jobs that Labour created) and set about creating a budget that meets the existing needs of Edinburgh within available funds and then look at how developments (like the tram project) can be funded.

However, I suspect that the trams will never pay their way and by scrapping them, we would immediately save £5 million a month.

Edinburgh can't afford this tram project. Particularly now.

7

Calum10,

22/08/2007 14:01:16

Edinburgh is skint because Labour threw all the money away.

Remember too the EEN supports the tram project.

So Edinburgh is now faced with closing schools, closing care homes and closing sports facilities so that citizens can have one tram line.

It's utter madness.

8

rof,

Sheffield 22/08/2007 14:51:48

Imagine for a moment, a young family struggling to live within its means, having to budget very carefully to pay for their essential needs and not having any spare cash for extravagant luxuries.
Then imagine that they decide to buy a brand new car; what do you think the reaction would be from other members of the community, maybe a member of that community is a town councillor? - would that reaction be say "why spend such money so unwisely on a status symbol, when they have such serious responsibilities"
Now think on a bigger scale, think say 'essential public services' and then think 't-r-a-m'
Nuff said?

9

Calum10,

22/08/2007 15:18:49

Lets not forget the Labour, Lib Dem, Green and Independent politicians Ewan Aitken, Margaret Smith, Robin Harper, Margo MacDonald, Maggie Chapman, Alison Johnstone and Ricky Henderson who joined forces and campaigned with the EEN under the banner, "Don't Trash Our Trams"


http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=607&id=850502007

I suppose it is perfectly okay to Trash Schools, Care Homes and Sports Facilities just so these people can have their bright, new and expensive trams on Edinburgh streets.

What folly, what utter folly.

10

Smythe,

edinburgh 22/08/2007 16:12:05

it is nonsense to blame Labour over a 1% budget discrepancy. £10M is nothing in a budget the size of this city. What we are seeing is a smokescreen from the new inexperienced councillors who have promised too much and can't now deliver. Add to that a botched school closure announcement and we see who is really making the mistakes

11

Calum10,

22/08/2007 16:14:31

#11 Sorry but you are wrong.

Labour is to blame for the financial mess.

Labour, Tories, Lib-Dems, the Greens and Margo MacDonald are to blame for the trams.

12

Padraig,

22/08/2007 16:51:20

Absolutely right, Calum (12) - the politicians who supported the trams without taking the trouble to actually read the documents were just asking to be taken for a ride.

So why was it only the SNP who had the gumption to see it as the white elephant it was? Was it because they listened to the concerns being expressed by concerned voters - and then took the trouble to check it out for themselves?

The others seem to have been swayed by the concept of "something for nothing" from the (Labour) Executive, who had their own development axe to grind!

13

Padraig,

22/08/2007 16:56:52

And Smythe (11) - you are wrong to say " £10M is nothing in a budget the size of this city" - it is a lot of money if we don't have it! And we don't - that is why services are likely to be cut where it shows!

On the other hand, if the new administration started to get rid of non-jobs, we would see an immediate saving. And that is a saving we should be making anyway - Labour created too many jobs to try to make a large part of the electorate dependent on them.

That is really why we have seen such an increase in public jobs, with good pension rights that private firms can't afford to pay.

Yet more Labour waste!

14

Padraig,

22/08/2007 16:58:22

And getting rid of tie by scrapping the trams would automatically get rid of tie and save £5 million A MONTH - we could see a real improvement in services for that kind of money!

15

Boy Wonder,

22/08/2007 18:34:16

One question ... where DID all the money go then, Your Holiness Mr Aitken??

16

Hmm ...,

22/08/2007 22:21:51

... they say that when you are in a hole, as Edinburgh City Council is, the first thing to do is stop digging!

Literally in this case - stop the tram line before any more money that we don't have is wasted on it. It will never pay its way anyway and without that expense we would soon have funds for real services that the City Council should be providing.

Never mind that the Scottish Executive is to stump up £5000 million toward it - it is the part that they will not fund that worries me - and should worry the Councillors.

17

Falsyde,

HIGHLAND SEP 23/08/2007 13:02:02

I seem to remember the last coalition involving Lib Dems ended up as a bouruch looks now as if this one will too.

It must surely be obvious that there is no possible way to associate the words Vision and Competence in the same sentence as with Lib Dems. One bouroch is unfortunate, two is careless. Perhaps some radical thinking is needed to find the way, preferably forward.

A few suggestions; no more multi coloured street painting on the tarmac, no more experimental route changes, no more tolerance of beggars, no more turning a blind eye to the litter, no more crass architectural excrucences based on delusional architects pursuit of personal fame in support of second rate egos. That should do to start with.

18

Concerned local,

Edinburgh 23/08/2007 20:16:13

Will all the people who were for the trams please agree to pay for the deficit from their own pockets?

Can't see this getting better - only worse with the blank cheque commitment to pay for trams regardless of the cost in council tax increases and council service decreases for years to come.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.