Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Rising seas could spell doom for Orkney islands

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 May 2009
ITS beaches are as stunning as any in the Maldives – even if its weather isn't.
Yet if the Orkney island of Sanday is very far from the Indian Ocean idyll, it looks set to share the same fate, as sea levels rise and storms become fiercer and more frequent.

Sanday, like the Maldives, may be "uninhabitable" by the end of the ce
ntury, a leading climate scientist warned last night. More dramatically, some experts fear the long, low-lying spit of land could split into two or more islands within the lifetimes of its 500 residents.

Sanday, and neighbouring North Ronaldsay, are now seen as so-called bellwether islands. Their low elevation and exposed positions mean they will be among the first places in the western world to face the brunt of global warming, even if the most optimistic predictions come true.

Kevin Anderson, climate change expert and professor at Manchester University, said: "These islands are barometers of the changes we are all going to see if we don't get our carbon emissions under control. What threatens them is a mix of quite small rises in sea level and a jump in the frequency and severity of storms. Storms that used to only occur occasionally will make some of these areas uninhabitable. People on these islands are vulnerable, but they will no doubt get help to relocate. Think, however, of more vulnerable people in poorer parts of the world with nowhere else to go".

Sanday and North Ronaldsay – whose famous seaweed-eating sheep are under threat – have always suffered from the weather. Their sea defences have been breached many times. But storms, locals acknowledge, have been getting tougher and more regular. Sanday has suffered several bouts of flooding that has split one side of the island from another, albeit temporarily. "One day the waters will just stay and there will be more than one Sanday," said one islander.

Liam McArthur, the Liberal Democrat who represents Orkney in the Scottish Parliament, was brought up on Sanday. He admits the island's position is now "precarious".

"There has always been a bit of gallows humour in Sanday," he said. "My parents live in the north end of the island and I have joked we'll need to get two ferries to see them, one to Sanday and another to the new island they will live on. The north end was cut off just two years ago.

"Obviously, we want to be hesitant about apocalyptic forecasts. But there is no doubt that, in a Scottish context, the first impact of climate change is in places like Orkney."

McArthur, however, believes the north isles face more immediate challenges, including depopulation. The numbers on the islands north of the Orkney mainland have held steady for more than two decades, but only thanks to new migrants, many from mainland Scotland and England. New jobs can be hard to come by, he said.

Some islanders are now talking of giving land to newcomers in exchange for helping with engineering work to stave off the effects of climate change.

In North Ronaldsay – which has around 60 inhabitants, down from 500 a century ago – the stone dyke that surrounds the island could be an early victim of global warming. It was built in the 1830s to keep the island's unique seaweed-eating sheep on shore; without it, the sheep would be lost. "It has already been replaced in parts by fencing," said Sam Harcus, who represents the North Isles on Orkney's council. "I think we are eventually going to have to offer people a croft and land in exchange for them giving up a day or two a week to maintain the dyke."

Orkney's internationally important neolithic sites are also at risk, with archaeologists now openly debating how and when they will abandon Skara Brae, the stone age village unearthed, ironically, by huge storms and now precariously nestled behind an eroding sandy beach.

Orkney's council leader, Stephen Hagan, last night described changes in the islands's climate so far as subtle. But he added: "There is nothing we can physically do to stop rising sea levels."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 May 2009 7:15 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Climate change
 
1

FerryPort,

31/05/2009 00:36:15

What comes around goes around
2

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 31/05/2009 00:52:27
Will these Global warming fanatics ever give up.
The sea levels are not rising and it always has been a stormy part of the UK.
3

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 31/05/2009 01:24:21
Some good initiatives and organisation from the Orkadians.
4

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 31/05/2009 07:50:36
nabodican will be pleased that the residents of Sanday enjoy significant power and income from their 8MW wind farm.
5

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 31/05/2009 07:56:38
nabodican should note also that

'Sea levels around the UK are now about 10cm higher than they were in 1900. Scientists predict that sea levels will rise by between 2 and 9mm per year (and could rise as much as 86cm in parts of the UK by the 2080s) as a result of climate change.'

Environment Agency.

6

Unimpressed one,

31/05/2009 09:30:22
"There is nothing we can physically do to stop rising sea levels."

A refreshing comment from a realist. Shame the King Canutes who subscribe to the 'climate chaos' tripe, don't think the same.


7

Yocal,

31/05/2009 09:59:55
Seems like two climate sceptics 'nabodican' and 'unimpressed one' are contradicting each other.

One says sea levels are not rising, the other agrees with a comment in the article that sea levels are rising, but there is nothing that can be done.

"...divided we fall"??
8

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 31/05/2009 10:27:33
#7 Yocal

That is the difference between scepticism and denial.

Scepticism is an honourable quality that seeks truth and will only be satisfied with a truth that is well grounded and thoroughly examined.

Denial is a dishonourable refusal to examine evidence and to cling to beliefs that are contrary to evidence and even self-contradictory.
9

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 31/05/2009 11:35:02
In the general thaw (with mini-ice periods) land masses are rising and falling too. Falling more so in SE Britain. The electric solar system is still not part of mainstream physics but how else have we observed its regularity and stability for long (needs a factor not considered in Newton's Laws)? How does society (does it exist) and individuals cope? Do we encourage sustainable farming from hardy local varieties - we don't know if the climate will warm or cool but can adapt - or go for high intensity mono-cultures and agribiz. Do we have secure graneries, foodstores, energy supplies.

Or maybe the super-rich have their boltholes and bunkers elsewhere and coundn't care less?
10

Unimpressed one,

31/05/2009 13:59:53
Sea levels have been rising since the end of the last ice age. Have I missed something?
11

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 31/05/2009 14:46:30
Tiree will be screwed as well ! Time to sell the Croft !

10:- You are absolutely right Global Warming is a fact though but the temperatures on Mars and Venus are also rising!

8 is quite right - there is no point in denying Global Warming but what I have a huge problem with is how the problem is being manipulated into ever increasing Political control.

Sea levels will rise - the planet will get warmer. Many people will be displaced and many people will lose their lives to future natural disasters caused by climate change - that is a categorical and unrefutable and fact. NOTHING will stop or alter that now and the Politicians and the 'experts' know this but they think they have to jump about a bit and talk the talk - but ever so subtly they are increasing taxes, taking away freedoms, and introducing layers of legislation which are solely aimed at 'control' and 'Jobs for the boys' and have little if not nothing to do with Climate Change.

Just make sure you don't buy too near sea level and you should be fine !
12

,

31/05/2009 17:08:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

seanie,

31/05/2009 17:51:01
The American Physical Society;

http://www.aps.org/policy/statements/07_1.cfm

“The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now.”
14

seanie,

31/05/2009 17:51:12
The Royal Society;

http://royalsociety.org/page.asp?id=6229

"Our scientific understanding of climate change is sufficiently sound to make us highly confident that greenhouse gas emissions are causing global warming. Science moves forward by challenge and debate and this will continue. However, none of the current criticisms of climate science, nor the alternative explanations of global warming are well enough founded to make not taking any action the wise choice. The science clearly points to the need for nations to take urgent steps to cut greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, as much and as fast as possible, to reduce the more severe aspects of climate change. We must also prepare for the impacts of climate change, some of which are already inevitable."
15

seanie,

31/05/2009 17:51:24
A Joint Science Academies’ statement;

http://www.icsu-africa.org/Resource_centre/Globalresponseclimatechange.pdf

"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action. It is vital that all nations identify cost effective steps that they can take now, to contribute to substantial and long-term reduction in net global greenhouse gas emissions."
16

seanie,

31/05/2009 17:51:37
The American Association for the Advancement of Science;

http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/climate_change/mtg_200702/aaas_climate_statement.pdf

"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society.
17

seanie,

31/05/2009 17:51:48
A statement from The Royal Meteorological Society;

http://www.rmets.org/news/detail.php?ID=332

"The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Inter Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is unequivocal in its conclusion that climate change is happening and that humans are contributing significantly to these changes. The evidence, from not just one source but a number of different measurements, is now far greater and the tools we have to model climate change contain much more of our scientific knowledge within them. The world’s best climate scientists are telling us its time to do something about it."
18

seanie,

31/05/2009 17:52:03
The Geological Society;

http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/gsl/null/lang/en/page1022.html

"We therefore add our voices to those urging more serious attention, and action, from national and international bodies. The central problem is one of the massive transfer of carbon from beneath the ground into the atmosphere, caused by humanity’s enormous demands for energy, and current dependence on fossil fuels to supply by far the greatest part of this energy."

and...

"We urge serious, and immediate, consideration of these issues. The dangers posed by climate change are no longer merely possible and long-term. They are probable, imminent, and global in scope."
19

Yocal,

31/05/2009 20:21:23
I see Voldemort throws in a strawman argument.

He/she claims denial is wrong, and then launches into a anthropogenic global warming denial comment by saying warming will happen for other reasons and there isn't anything that can be done.

But i guess anyone calling themselves voldemort likes fantasy.

20

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 31/05/2009 20:36:06
The trouble is that it's goverments and international corporations that have caused this carbon extraction and combustion and most people have no influence on what they'll do next. They also caused nuclear bombs, nerve gas, germ warfare etc. Left to their own devices people might have merely burnt some sea coal and put paraffin in their lamps.

Perhaps as an individual, you could do something; and as an organised group quite alot more.

Corporations also attract the world's best scientists to the top universities and anything new and important they discover is now their property. It's been known for 100 years that we don't need to depend on fossil fuels and this was publically demonstrated back in 1980. However these technologies are strictly classified and used only in military projects (also done by corporations) for superior weapons of mass destruction.

However the times could be a-changing if we want to make it so. On the schedule for Spaceship Earth we are in unique times.
21

Yocal,

01/06/2009 09:12:51
Slioch said:"Scepticism is an honourable quality that seeks truth and will only be satisfied with a truth that is well grounded and thoroughly examined."

Yocal: It is also a political method of slowing down or attempting to stop essential changes. It can just as easily be used to confuse, using lies and misleading information. In that respect, a literal interpretation of scepticism is naive.
22

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 02/06/2009 11:22:39
#21 Yocal

But then I would not refer to people like nabodican and unimpressed one as "sceptics": they are deniers, crude and simple. And they, and more importantly websites like Wattsupwiththat and Icecap and the rest of their genre, use it, as you say, "to confuse, using lies and misleading information".

They refer to themselves as "sceptics" and object to being called "deniers" particularly, they claim, because it associates them with holocaust deniers. That latter claim is as spurious as much of the rest of their output. Denial has a long and dishonourable tradition and crops up commonly when people are confronted by facts that they do not wish to believe. It has no particular association with the holocaust.

So, I think our only difference is that what we call a spade: I call a spade a spade and I don't disgrace the word "sceptic" by associating it with people who deserve to be called "deniers".


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.