Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Climate blamed as one in five seabirds dies

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 June 2009
A LACK of food due to climate change has been blamed for a 19 per cent drop in Scotland's seabird population over the past eight years.
Experts say the decline, which is much greater than the 9 per cent drop for the UK as a whole, highlights a deeply worrying trend.

The stark picture is revealed in a report from the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), together with the la
test figures for 2000 to 2008 from Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH).

The JNCC said the figures represented a "turning of the tide" for seabirds breeding in Scotland, which increased in numbers from the late 1960s to the end of the 1990s.

The major cause of the problem is almost certainly a shortage of small fish, such as sand eels, which are likely being affected by rising sea temperatures, they said.

It means fewer adult birds are surviving from one year to the next, and not enough chicks are being produced to replace them.

Among species affected were black-legged kittiwake and Arctic skuas, which have fallen by 55 per cent and 71 per cent since the mid-1980s. Arctic terns declined by 26 per cent over the same period.

On Copinsay in Orkney, there has been a 70 per cent decline in razorbills, a 57 per cent drop in Kittiwakes and 25 per cent fall in guillemot numbers since 2000.

Prof Colin Galbraith, SNH director of policy and advice, said:

"After several decades of increasing seabird abundance, we are now witnessing a period of decline. Key reasons are likely to be linked to food availability, weather and predation. In particular, climate change appears to have affected plankton at the base of the food web."

Douglas Gilbert, RSPB reserve ecologist, said if the declines continued, many of Scotland's "seabird cities" could be almost deserted within a decade.







Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 June 2009 9:33 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Climate change
 
1

nabodican,

Newton Stewart 12/06/2009 00:23:45
Rising sea temperatures my backside!
While surface temperatures are affected by the sun, you have two layers below that and the bottom layer is pretty much the same anywhere in the world.
I would suggest that other than natural variation, the only difference in their food chain is down to the fishing industry.
This is just more fund seeking numpties jumping on the "global warming" scam
2

Dumb Eye @,

beside a distant sea 12/06/2009 02:11:37
And of course the industrial scale "hoovering" of sand-eels couldn't possibly be a factor in the decline of feed stocks, could it?
3

Media at One,

12/06/2009 06:19:24
It's not called climate change - its called Nature!
Let's leave it at that.
4

overton,

aberdeen 12/06/2009 06:59:19
Nabodican, #1:

You are 100% correct this has nothing to do with Global Warming and has to do with Industrial Fishing for Sand Eels - what is disturbing is that ingnorant people in the media (including one of the gushing Anchormen in Naturewatch the other night there) insist that Global Warming is the cause without reference to the scale of the fishing. The Sand Eels are used to feed pigs.

See old article below:

'A Danish fleet of 250 boats takes a million tonnes a year of the tiny fish in an "industrial" catch - they are not sold for human consumption but processed into fishmeal, oil and margarine, and at one time were burnt in power stations.

But overfishing has in the past caused seabird populations to fall dramatically, and yesterday the Fisheries minister, Elliot Morley, proposed to the European Commission that sandeel fishing should be banned in a large area each year from April to August, the seabird breeding season.

The area is in international waters off the east coast of Britain, from Humberside to the Orkneys, and in places is more than 50 miles wide.'

5

Andrew Morton,

Berkshire 12/06/2009 08:14:50
The climate is being blamed here, not people.

Such is the hysteria over MMGW, the mere mention of "climate" raises hackles almost immediately. Time the sponsers of MMGW and media outlets changed tack i think.

Agree about the Danish sand eel hooverers however!
6

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 12/06/2009 08:37:45
'As the Earth's oceans warm, the masses of tiny plants growing at their surface is declining, say US researchers. Their results show that the productivity of global oceans is tightly linked to climate change and has steadily decreased between 1999 and 2004.'

- http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10743-warming-oceans-produce-less-phytoplankton.html

7

Andrew Morton,

Berkshire 12/06/2009 08:40:19
Last time I put an ice cube in my drink, it cooled it down.
8

long live the supermarkets,

every little hurts 12/06/2009 09:12:32
Great news at last, here in Dundee we are dive bombed with seagulls on a daily basis every time i clean my car they s@@t all over it,maybe its because its blue
9

The Former Mr. Angry,

12/06/2009 09:37:35
"The stark picture is revealed in a report from the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), together with the figures for 2000 to 2008 from Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH)."

Everyone's beaten me to it on the Danish boats hoovering up the sandeels - which has been known for a heck of a long time, but since the experts are all nice wee European socialists it couldn't be that could it? So it's highly convenient to drop the blame at the usual door of "MMGW", so HM Gov can tax us even more and they get bigger grants to produce more "expert" reports which anyone's dog could write. Biggest lot of sh1t3 on the planet.


10

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 12/06/2009 14:27:58
To sum up so far - Death by Natural Causes.

I wonder just when the climate didn't change?
11

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 12/06/2009 14:33:00
This from Australia.

Andrew Bolt Herald Sun

June 10, 2009 12:00am

STEVE Fielding has had a conversion that could blow apart the great global warming scare.

No wonder the Rudd Government is scrambling and the ABC is already sliming the Family First senator.

You see, Fielding has suddenly realised that global warming may not be caused by humans after all.

What has startled him out of merely accepting we're heating the world to hell with our carbon dioxide emissions is one fact in particular.
While our emissions are increasing fast each year, satellite measurements show the world's temperatures have still not risen above the 1998 record, and have actually fallen since 2002.

Of course, all this has been pointed out before. I've asked both Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Climate Change Minister Penny Wong - to their faces - to explain why the world isn't still warming as it should if their global warming theories are right.

Neither has given me an answer. Nor have they answered similar challenges from the few sceptics in Parliament who have dared to reveal themselves - notably the Nationals' Barnaby Joyce and the Liberals' Dennis Jensen.

But here's why Fielding's conversion is potentially so much more dangerous to the Government than sniping from mere columnists or Coalition MPs.

Fielding is not just in a position to ask the Government the same question. He can also demand a straight answer.

If he does not get it, his vote in the Senate could destroy the Rudd Government's plan to impose billions of dollars of taxes on all our sources of emissions - from power stations and smelters to, eventually, even cows.
12

Geomac 1,

Scotland 12/06/2009 17:06:56
For goodness sake, why is it always climate change or sea temperature increase to blame - could it not be the massive hoovering up of sand eels by the Danes??
the number of spurious and desperate claims about issues being blamed on global warming or climate change is increasing daily without a single shred of evidence. This hysteria has to stop until some sort of proff is provided!! The climate has changed virtually continuously and will change again - nothing is more sure but to blame this for every natural event is nonsense!!
13

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 12/06/2009 17:24:26
#11 dido-bendigo

I wouldn't get too excited by Fielding's nonsense if I were you. You and Fielding seem to believe that global warming means that it should get warmer every year: that is not the case. Even the most rudimentary perusal of either the satellite measurements (that began in 1979) or the surface temperature measurements, that go back to the 19th century, show that during periods of warming there are episodes of several years when average global temperatures do not increase. This has happened in the recent (since 1975) warming that is largely attributed to human factors, and also in the early 20th century warming in which human factors played only a minor role.

To be more precise, the warming since 1975 has been at a rate of about 0.016deg Celsius per year, whereas the annual variation imposed upon that trend is up to + or - 0.2degC/year. Thus the annual variation is more than ten times the annual increment. That being the case, periods of several years with declining or stable temperatures are inevitable.

The question to ask is, "Is the recent dip in average global temperatures statistically significant of change in trend" The answer to that question is emphatically "NO" - there is nothing in the recent average global temperature record to suggest that "global warming has stopped".

Perhaps the reason why Kevin Rudd didn't answer Fielding was because the only appropriate one would have been to say, "Stop being such an idiot and stop misleading gullible fools by statistically illiterate garbage. Run away and learn some science and how to interpret data, there's a good lad."
14

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 12/06/2009 17:36:02
For those who wrongly doubt that the North Sea has been warming, see the following from October 2006:

"The North Sea's water temperature rose to a record average of 2.4 degrees Celsius in October compared to the same period between 1963-1993 in the latest climate-change spinoff, a new German study found Tuesday.

The temperature of North Sea waters in October averaged 14.2 degrees Celsius (57.6 Fahrenheit) -- or 2.4 degrees higher than the average calculated for the same month from the beginning of the measurements in 1968, and 1993, according to the study by Germany's Federal Office of Maritime Transport and Hydrography.

The milder waters are part of a longer North Sea heating trend registered since 1988 -- the longest and most intense since sea samples were first tested in 1873."

see:
http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Global_Warming_Triggers_North_Sea_Temperature_Rise_999.html
15

n/,

Perth 12/06/2009 17:51:20
Re#12 'For goodness sake, why is it always climate change or sea temperature increase to blame - could it not be the massive hoovering up of sand eels''???????????


Remember the following.............and again in the 'Scotsman'.???????????

Fear for birds as eel fishing resumes



« Previous « PreviousNext » Next »View GalleryPublished Date: 20 June 2006
By FRANK URQUHART
THE European Commission yesterday announced controversial plans to end a 12 month ban on fishing for sandeels in the North Sea, sparking renewed fears about the impact on Britain's seabird populations.
The unprecedented ban on the Danish-dominated fishery was imposed last July, because of a major collapse in the sandeel stock, and prevented millions of the tiny fish from being vacuumed up from the seabed and turned into fish meal.

Sandeels are ADVERTISEMENTat the bottom of the North Sea food chain and a vital component in the diet of cod, haddock, and mackerel - crucial catches for the Scottish white fish and pelagic fleets - as well as a number of native Scottish seabirds.

The collapse of the sandeel stock was blamed for a series of disastrous breeding seasons at many of Scotland's "seabird cities" and delays in nesting and low seabird populations across the country.

But the European Commission yesterday announced that the sandeel fishery is to reopen with the total allowable catch (TAC) for the North Sea set at 300,000 tonnes this year. The lifting of the ban was approved by the council of Europe's fisheries ministers at a meeting in Luxembourg.

A spokesman for the Commission said: "These measures have been taken on the basis of scientific advice provided by the scientific, technical and economic committee which has estimated the number of sandeels born last year and joining the North Sea stock to be no less than 324,000 million individuals."

He added: "The condition of the North Sea sandeel stock has been in severe decline for a number of years. In December, 20
16

n/,

Perth 12/06/2009 18:08:00
a number of years. In December, 2004, council approved a cut of 20 per cent in the TAC for 2005, subject to in-year monitoring and revision. Following receipt of scientific advice that the 2004 year class had fallen beneath 300,000 million individuals, the Commission adopted a regulation on 15 July, 2005, closing the North Sea and Skagerrak sandeel fishery until the end of the year.

"The Commission welcomes the fact that stock levels are now high enough to permit the fishery to reopen on a commercial scale, but points out that the condition of the stock remains fragile, and will require continued monitoring and control so as to ensure that the TAC and fishing effort levels set for 2006 contribute to its long-term sustainability."

Kara Brydson, RSPB Scotland's marine and coastal policy officer, said: "It is important to understand that the sandeel stock remains extremely fragile. The ban on the North Sea fishery was only in place for one season, and it may be too early to claim that this has been a success and allowed stocks to recover.

17

n/,

Perth 12/06/2009 18:08:49
This fishery must continue to be very closely monitored to allow the fishing effort to be altered at short notice. The RSPB will, as always, be keeping a close eye on how the seabirds fare this breeding season."

Yesterday's meeting of the Council of Fisheries Ministers also approved a new European fund of more than £2.5 billion which will operate for seven years and support the fishing industry as they adapt to catch cuts and help fishing communities to diversify their economic base.
18

Geomac 1,

Scotland 12/06/2009 19:32:52
Thanks for your support n/Perth #s 15.16 and 17
19

dido-bendigo,

12/06/2009 20:10:36
#13 Siloch

OK how about some evidence to the contrary. Try this - http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/environment/pouring-cold-water-on-global-warming-14299972.html
20

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 12/06/2009 20:14:49
#13 Siloch

Of course Fielding is only an engineer so what does he know! Article continued to enlighten the uninitiated.

With the Liberals refusing to back the scheme this year, the Government needs not just the votes of the Greens but of the two crossbench senators, Nick Xenophon . . . and Fielding.

But Fielding, an engineer, is now insisting he be shown the proof that the world is even still warming, and the Government must at last justify its plan's most basic assumption.

Five days ago, in the US, he put this very question to Joseph Aldy, President Barack Obama's special assistant on energy and the environment, and is yet to get the answer he's been promised.

Now he'll sit down with Wong - probably within the week - and ask again: Why is the world still not warming when our emissions are increasing?

See the Government now frantically wondering how to answer. Climate Change Assistant Minister Greg Combet yesterday would not even say if he'd allow Fielding to consult Government scientists.

Amazing. Is science now so political that its findings must be restricted?

Yet perhaps the strangest thing about Fielding's conversion is his confession:

"Until recently I, like most Australians, simply accepted without question the notion that global warming was a result of increased carbon emissions."

How is it that even a politician did not know until someone the other day thrust graphs into his hand that thousands of scientists doubt man is warming the world?

Or that the warming has paused this decade?

The ABC's treatment of Fielding since he announced his new position explains perhaps why such information isn't getting out, and why so many sceptics do not dare speak.

Take Fielding's interview on Jon Faine's ABC 774 program yesterday.

Faine refused to ask about the problems in the warming theory that had made Fielding demand answers.

Instead he asked angrily whether Fielding's "religious approach" was messing with his
21

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 12/06/2009 20:21:37
Of course we all know that the earth has been warming up in recent times. It will continue to do so until it enters another cooling period. I call it global climate Yo-Yo effect. All the windfarms we can build will not make one iota of difference, but it will certainly line the pockets of some with subsidies! Public money - Penny a bucketfull!
22

n/,

Perth 12/06/2009 20:34:21
#18. Your welcome Geomac 1 ..and let's not forget where the real problem lies,as admitted in April of this year 09!

''European Commission admits failure of fishing policy
Europe's Common Fisheries Policy has failed and a completely new fishing management system is needed, the European Commission has admitted
23

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 12/06/2009 23:41:08

#20 dido-bendigo asked

"#13 Siloch

OK how about some evidence to the contrary. Try this - http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/environment/pouring-cold-water-on-global-warming-14299972.html"

Recycled garbage from the Heartland Institute conference in New York. It claims, "800 leading climatologists". What utter drivel. If you believe this sort of rubbish you will believe anything.

But if you want a sober statistical account of the average global temperature changes in recent years, with graphs clearly illustrating why the sort of stuff put out by the Heartland Institute is rubbish see this:

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/12/31/stupid-is-as-stupid-does/

and

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/dont-get-fooled-again/

Incidentally, one of the insignificant bits of information trotted out in the Belfast Telegraph article was information about the recent winter. Individual monthly temperatures have little significance, but for what it is worth you might like to know that this May's global average temperature was the third equal warmest on record.

see:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

It isn't significant, except in that it shows that the claim that global temperature "has been decreasing ever since" is nonsense.
24

nabodican,

Newton Stewart 13/06/2009 10:29:58
Slioch, The North Sea temperatures along with offshore locations around the world have been getting measured on a daily basis in order to calculate the speed of sound in water. I hate to disillusion you but there has been no measurable change over the last 30 years !!
Yah, Boo, sucks !!!!!!!!!!!
25

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 13/06/2009 11:07:03
#24 Nabodican

As usual, you present a bald, and frankly ridiculous, assertion with no evidence or reference to back it up. Do you just make these denials up as you go along?

In contrast, see:

1. "The stock of North Sea cod is under pressure because of overfishing, and we show here that it is also threatened by a decline in the production of young cod that has paralleled warming of the North Sea over the past ten years." from:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v404/n6774/full/404142a0.html

2. "Global warming has forced fish stocks in the North Sea scores of miles north to cooler waters, according to a study by climate change scientists.

Major fish species, including cod and haddock, have sought out cooler waters in response to a 1C rise in the temperature of the North Sea over the past 25 years." from:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/may/13/environment

3.
26

nabodican,

Newton Stewart 13/06/2009 23:05:49
Slioch, The sea temperatures that I have observed and refer to are simply not in the domain of the climate scaremongers such as yourself. They are in the domain of the offshore industry and used as a tool to ensure that survey positioning data is accurate.
As someone who has been involved with this for over 27 years, I can claim to be reasonably knowledgeable about the subject.
When did you last measure sea temperature ?
27

fred bloggs,

Edinburgh 14/06/2009 07:47:13
'Over the past 25 years the rate of increase in sea surface temperature in all European seas has been about 10 times faster than the average rate of increase during the past century. In five European seas the warming occurs even more rapidly. In the North and Baltic Seas temperature rose five to six times faster than the global average over the past 25 years, and three times faster in the Black and Mediterranean Seas.'

http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/coast_sea/sea-surface-temperature

28

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 14/06/2009 14:08:05
#26 Nabodican

So you resort to unpublished data from the oil industry that by its nature cannot be publicly checked. How convenient for you! The basic principle of science is that data should be published if it is to be given credence. Yours, if it exists, fails that basic test.

BTW did you know that there is another

So you have been involved with the oil industry for 27 years. Why am I not surprised that you come out with a constant stream of garbage and denial about global warming and renewable energy!

#27 fred bloggs
Thanks for that - a much better source than any I had managed to find.

BTW did you know that there is another Fred Bloggs (with capitals) out there? See:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/5462580/Global-warming-and-a-tale-of-two-planets.html

I can't imagine it is you, and I hope others don't get you confused.







29

Slioch,

Scottish Highlands 14/06/2009 14:09:56
Sorry for the slightly mangled post above: please delete the first "BTW did you know that there is another"

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.