Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Teenagers' love of chips undimmed by national healthy food campaign

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 January 2008
TEENAGERS are still choosing the chip shop over healthy lunches, according to a new study on school meals.
A progress report into a national scheme to improve the health of pupils has criticised secondary schools for not trying hard enough.

The study, by HMIe inspectors, is the first time secondary schools have undergone scrutiny on the Hungry for Suc
cess initiative.

And it warns that healthy school meals alone are not enough to tackle Scotland's obesity crisis.

Graham Donaldson, senior chief inspector, says: "Progress in secondary schools has been slower (than in primary].

"In part this relates to a lack of priority and urgency in implementing Hungry for Success in secondary schools."

He also blames the peer and commercial pressures of teenage culture and the fact that secondary school pupils can leave the school grounds at lunchtime.

The report also says more work needs to be done and reveals examples of bad practice.

It says: "A few primary and secondary schools were still, inappropriately, using sweets as rewards."

Other bad practice includes incorrect labelling of sandwiches, using only white bread and having no salad, home- baking being displayed more prominently than fruit and schools selling sweets after lunch.

Primary schools, on the other hand, are found to have performed well.

The report says: "The availability of fruit and vegetables in primary school lunches was good overall and in some cases it was very good.

"It varied in the secondary schools inspected where less than half of the schools actively promoted and encouraged the uptake of vegetables, salad and fruit."

The report also says that even where healthy food is provided in a school, it is difficult to know whether children are actually eating it.

It says: "Implementation of Hungry for Success has not provided comprehensive information about what pupils actually eat at school lunches – as some may leave food or regularly select less healthy choices."

Recommendations include improving uptake of school meals, which is stable at around 54 per cent, and commissioning research into what children actually eat during the day.

Adam Ingram, children's minister, said school meals in Scotland were getting better.

He said: "We know that changing teenagers' diets is one of our greatest challenges, but we believe that young people need to have the knowledge and freedom to make the best food choices possible.

"That's why early intervention is so important. We need to change lifestyles and habits if we are to achieve our aim of a smarter, healthier Scotland.

"Like HMIE, we know that improving food in schools is only one piece of the puzzle.

"Schools cannot solve Scotland's poor diet and related health problems on their own."

He said the Scottish Government was taking action but business, the public sector and communities had to work together to improve the nation's diet.

He added that a discussion was to be launched as part of developing a national food policy for Scotland.

David Eaglesham, general secretary of the Scottish Secondary Teachers' Association, said: "It is very difficult to get a secondary school signed up to an issue in the way that you can a primary.

"Although you do have assemblies at secondary, you don't have the same degree of whole-school involvement.

"Also, there are probably a lot more messages that have to be got across in a secondary school, about drugs, weapons, safe sex and the world of work, and they are all competing."

HUNGRY FOR A HEALTHY DIET

HUNGRY for Success was a report published in 2003 by a Scottish Executive panel.

It set out key principles to improve the quality of food prepared for pupils in schools across the country.

The report recommended all pupils have access to healthy choices, and that all schools must educate children on a healthy diet.

However, guidance on school meals published by the previous Scottish Executive under the Schools (Health Promotion and Nutrition) Act last year was criticised for allowing children to eat chips every day with a meal, despite experts' advice to limit chips to three times a week.

Revised guidance, issued by the SNP Scottish Government later last year, took a step further in banning cereal bars, extending a ban on sugary fizzy drinks to include diet drinks, and limiting chips to three times a week.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 January 2008 11:46 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Children's Diet
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 15/01/2008 00:36:32
For, 'Goodness, Goodness, Sake' 'OF-COURSE',
Children prefer "Chips" or a McDonald's to a apple or carrot.!!

You DONT need to be Einstein to work that out, 'DhooOoha'!

"Sweets" are,,have been and always will be a 'Treat' this is Not the Problem,,'DhooOoha'!

"Sweets have been with us for 'All-Time' and when I was at School, the average Girls waist, was only about 24inches!

Evolution and lack of play and exercise is now with our young.

And everything in Nature and in the World,, that is going to, 'die-out' gets bigger before it does, 'die out'

This IS FACT..'check-it-out'.!

Anyway WHY AGAIN.! Pick on our "Teenagers".??
You want to; 'Inject Them' (Girls)!
You want to; 'Stop them Smoking'!
You want to; 'Stop them Drinking'!
You want to; 'Stop them having Sex'!
You NOW want to; 'Stop them eating what they Want'!

'BY-GOD'!! You are going to have a 'Revolution' on your hands and I will be leading It!

Advice them, 'YES'.. But!..DONT for 'ONE-MINUTE'
Try to lead their Lifes!!
2

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 15/01/2008 00:44:52
THIS MUST STOP NOW.!!...'CONTROL-FREAKS'.!!
3

Arty Facila-Arty,

15/01/2008 01:00:16
PM still backing him, but will Hain face police inquiry into £103,000 donations?
4

Arty Facila-Arty,

15/01/2008 01:10:21
You asked:

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/politics/PM-still-backing-him-.3671402.jp

Too right , he should.
5

Shamus,

Glasgow 15/01/2008 01:16:30
3#. You can buy a lot of delicious chips with curry sauce for £103,000. A lot better than school meals.
6

Julian.,

edinburgh 15/01/2008 02:40:02
Charles,

The experts say that it is both diet and lack of exercise which have caused obesity in our children. Are you denying this?
7

Long Black Veil,

New York 15/01/2008 03:47:24
I ate the same miserable, unhealthy food for lunch at school when I was a kid that all kids in western countries are eating today and I've always been thin as a rail. The difference is that they took PE (Phys Ed) out of the curriculum and kids are not now required to get any exercise. Add to that the fact that they are fed dangerous, debilitating drugs, often for no reason at all, as if these medications were Christmas candy.
As to getting kids to eat healthily: When I was in primary school, my mother developed a terrific habit of handing my sister and myself a plate of raw vegetables when we would sit down to watch our evening cartoons. She didn't blow a trumpet but just hand us each a plate, and we would sit there stuffing ourselves with raw carrots and peas from the pod with our eyes glued to the TV, watching the Three Stooges. It was her way of compromising, because she didn't want us watching the telly anyway so she figured as long as we were going to do it anyway, she would slip us some of the things she had trouble getting us to eat at the dinner table. It worked like a charm and, to this day, fresh vegetables still taste better in front of the TV.
I think a lot of the obesity crisis in western countries is down to 3 things: no emphasis on physical training in the schools, abuse of presecription drugs, and addiction to social networking software, which discourages teens from offline experiences that would burn more calories.
8

Mirrorman,

Edge of insanity 15/01/2008 07:37:31
Drugs, weapons, safe sex, alcohol? What the hell happened to Home Economics and Woodwork?
9

Unimpressed one,

15/01/2008 08:56:31
#3, Heard that they've set loose the DWP benefit fraud team on him!
10

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 09:36:04
#6:

Lack of excercise? Yes. Diet? No.

Kids are (or at least WANT TO) eat what they have always eaten---and what is GOOD FOR THEM incidentally.

The excercise factor is what is confounding everything. In the 1960s and 1970s, we learned to ride push-bikes, passed our cycling proficiency test and RODE OUR BIKES (without helmets) on the road, with other traffic, during the day and night. We also went out to play. We climbed trees, had running races up and down the pavement and built "dens" in the woods. We were out 'til about 8pm most evenings, whether it was dark or not.

We were told not to accept sweets or lifts from strangers and we didn't. We were taught road safety, we listened and put the rules into practice, therefore we weren't involved in any tragic accidents. The rest we learnt by trial and error. There were bumps, bruises and for some of us, occasional broken bones. But we survived and stayed fit.

Nowadays, kids aren't allowed to do what we did. They are taken to school by car in case someone attacks them or they get run over. They're not allowed to ride their bikes unless an adult is with them. They're not allowed to go into the woods in case a child molester is lurking in the bushes and as for building tree houses, that is forbidden without hard hats and safety harnesses.

The reason the kids are fat nowadays is nothing to do with diet and everything to do with brain-dea political correctness and nanny-state-ism.
11

Horrible Cankers..dans le Cyber Shebeen,

15/01/2008 10:41:08
7...Try handing raw veg to kids in Glasgow and they'l phone a lawyer.....kids are turning into blobs cos they sit on their bahookys every spare moment...at the telly...computer games...internet...I hardly ever see kids in Glasgow playing outside anymore...I am sure they still play in the playground cos they've no choice..but where are the wee girls, playing peever (pavements used to be covered in chalk marks), or ropes, or playing bounce ball against a wall..little boys on home made bogies..keepy-up in the street..

Technology...the more it advances...the blobbier we'l git.......
12

McMicrogal,

15/01/2008 11:22:32
"The Grubby" at the Royal High seats 700, the school has over twice this number of pupils.

At the end of lunch break the street from RHS to D-Mains is strewn with chip papers and wrappers from Grieggs.

At the end of the school day you can't move for parents with their cars parked as close as they can possibly manage to the school gate to collect their offspring, most of whom live within a mile of the school.

Draw your own conclusions as to the problems faced by this ONE school, never mind all the others!
13

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 11:24:35
#11, excellent post.

And why can't the government mind its own business?
14

G,

dndy 15/01/2008 12:59:05
#8 You are being particularly stolid today.
The Gov does not care if you are fat, unhealthly and die young - it wants you to have a healthier life because it costs them less....
IF we are to prevent this generation from being less healthy and live shorter lives than previous ones we need to get bashing the message home....
15

Galaman,

Galashiels 15/01/2008 13:16:06
Surely the main reason why junk food is so popular is because it is so tasty.
So-called healthy foods are too often tasteless and bland compared with junk food.
16

,

15/01/2008 14:11:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

,

15/01/2008 14:13:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 16/01/2008 00:35:06
Charles, you really must get out more,

You want to; 'Inject Them' (Girls)! protection against cancer
You want to; 'Stop them Smoking'! protection against cancers
You want to; 'Stop them Drinking'! no not stop but stop binge drinking
You want to; 'Stop them having Sex'! this one concerns me Charles do you like the thought of "teens" having sex?
You NOW want to; 'Stop them eating what they Want'!
19

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 16/01/2008 01:09:20
22 Ross Fyffe, 'Dinny-Get-Smart'
I am out all the time and keep up to date.!
After-all, I am married to my DYW.!
I have NO-CHOICE, and quite frankly, 'train-sets' have,
'NO-PLACE'.. in my Life.! :-))
20

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 16/01/2008 04:46:41
23 DYW dooes the Y stand for YOUNG??
21

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 16/01/2008 08:34:44
24 Ross Fyffe,

"dooes the Y stand for YOUNG??"

Absolutely!.... 'DARLING-YOUNG-WIFE'..and she is..! :-D
22

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 16/01/2008 08:37:23
BTW... I am NOT her...'Sugar-Daddy'... :-))
23

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 16/01/2008 12:18:59
did I say you were?? if you have children will you be letting them become promoscious, binge drinking, cigarette smoking, "teens"
24

Charles Linskaill,

.Edinburgh 17/01/2008 00:24:32
27 Ross Fyffe, What I am saying is,
You wont stop a teen doing anything, if they feel fit to do so, no-matter how you bring them up!

Can you remember being a "teen",? I bet you did things you were not ment to!

"You want to; 'Stop them having Sex'! this one concerns me Charles do you like the thought of "teens" having sex?"

NO I DONT, But its their learning process!
What would you Do,?...'Harness them All',?

Why try to control and bring in new Laws for 'teens' , that they will find away to break, if they want,?
'Teen-Years' are experemental years!
All we can do is advise them and hope they will learn and listen!
At the Days end.. if they want to,..they will!
25

Long Black Veil,

New York 17/01/2008 05:54:15
#21 Chairman Gordon:

I am a size zero and I do not consider myself underweight. At 5'2", I shouldn't weigh any more than I do, (although it's often not a question of weight on the scale, since muscle weighs more than fat). If more women looked like I do, this would be a better not a worse world, the fish in our oceans wouldn't be nearly depleted (see New York Times of two days ago), and there would be more pret-a-porter clothing in the designer shops in my size. This media-driven open season on thin women was concocted to sell tabloids to the growing masses of fatties in western countries who need to make themselves feel better on a lonely Saturday night by buying up magazines showing "anorexic" starlets without their makeup. But it's these enormoids who are responsible for about 50% of the healthcare costs in the US, rising costs of air transportation, and a disappearing food supply. People really do eat more now than they did in earlier times and just you try finding some wholesome, affordable, non-processed, non-preserved ingredients for a homeade stew or salad or soup at your local supermarket and you'll find it's much cheaper to buy up the fat-filled convenience foods.
26

Long Black Veil,

New York 17/01/2008 05:56:09
#21 Chairman Gordon:

I am a size zero and I do not consider myself underweight. At 5'2", I shouldn't weigh any more than I do, (although it's often not a question of weight on the scale, since muscle weighs more than fat). If more women looked like I do, this would be a better not a worse world, the fish in our oceans wouldn't be nearly depleted (see New York Times of two days ago), and there would be more pret-a-porter clothing in the designer shops in my size. This media-driven open season on thin women was concocted to sell tabloids to the growing masses of fatties in western countries who need to make themselves feel better on a lonely Saturday night by buying up magazines showing "anorexic" starlets without their makeup. But it's these enormoids who are responsible for about 50% of the healthcare costs in the US, rising costs of air transportation, and a disappearing food supply. People really do eat more now than they did in earlier times and just you try finding some wholesome, affordable, non-processed, non-preserved ingredients for a homeade stew or salad or soup at your local supermarket and you'll find it's much cheaper to buy up the fat-filled convenience foods.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.