Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Max Mosley 'orgy' ruling: Press 'less free' after judge's verdict

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 July 2008
FORMULA 1 boss Max Mosley won £60,000 in damages from the News of the World yesterday in a decision experts warned could have far-reaching implications for privacy issues.
The newspaper faces a total legal bill of about £850,000 following the judgment, which its editor claimed was further evidence investigative journalism was being "strangled by stealth".

Mr Mosley was awarded the record pay-out after the judge ruled the newspaper's "sick Nazi orgy" story was not in the public interest.

Mr Justice Eady said Mr Mosley could expect "privacy in relation to sexual activities, albeit unconventional, carried on between consenting adults on private property".

He also said there was "no evidence" the sadomasochistic orgies in which Mr Mosley took part with five prostitutes had any Nazi themes. The tabloid had claimed the orgy it reported and secretly recorded in March this year had been deliberately designed to be a Nazi-style occasion, with Mr Mosley posing as a concentration camp prisoner and the women in the role of guards.

But the judge said there was "no genuine basis" for the suggestion Holocaust victims had been mocked.

Outside court, Mr Mosley said: "I am delighted with a judgment which is devastating for the News of the World. It demonstrates that their Nazi lie was a complete invention with no justification.

"It also shows they had no right to go into private premises and take pictures and film adults engaged in activities which are no-one's business but their own to know. I am very pleased with this result."

In his ruling, Mr Justice Eady said the newspaper could not claim it was acting in the public interest. "There was bondage, beating and domination, which seem to be typical of S&M behaviour," he said. "But there was no public interest or other justification for the clandestine recording, for the publication of the resulting information and still photographs, or for the placing of the video extracts on the News of the World website – all of this on a massive scale."

But he did not give Mr Mosley, 68, the unprecedented award of punitive – rather than compensatory – damages he had sought.

The judge said: "It is perhaps worth adding that there is nothing 'landmark' about this decision. It is simply the application to rather unusual facts of recently developed but established principles."

Colin Myler, the editor of the News of the World, defended his decision to publish and said the press would be "less free" following the judgment.

Media lawyers tended to agree. Sarah Webb, head of defamation at Russell Jones & Walker, said: "This decision is an enormous boost to the law of privacy. It means it is going to be almost impossible for the media to publish anything that touches on the fundamental aspects of a person's private life, such as their family life, sexual behaviour, orientation or medical conditions, and show that such publication is in the public interest."

Mark Stephens, of law firm Finers Stephens Innocent, said: "I think the spanking Mosley has given the News of the World will clamp the rest of the investigative media – the legitimate investigative media – in chains."

BACKGROUND

THE court heard explicit details of the encounter on 28 March between Max Mosley and five women – known as A, B, C, D, and E – in a Chelsea flat the F1 boss had rented.

Described by A as "hugely sexy", the five-hour role-play session began when E chained up a naked Mosley and, along with A, performed a lice inspection on him before verbally insulting the 68-year-old and shaving his buttocks.

Later, A birched Mosley and caned him, leaving him requiring a plaster on his bottom.

After a break, Mosley punished A, C, and D with a strap, while speaking German to B and E, who were dressed in military uniforms.

They then performed sex acts on each other before having a drink and leaving.

ANALYSIS: Wife of 48 years 'devastated' by sex revelations

THE one person seldom mentioned throughout Max Mosley's High Court case arguably suffered the greatest damage from its candid revelations – his wife, Jean.

Married to the F1 boss for 48 years, she knew nothing of her husband's unusual sexual inclinations until the News of the World deemed them worthy of its front page.

It was, Mr Mosley told the court, "totally devastating for her" when she read about his penchant for sadomasochistic sex with prostitutes. He said the exposé "had more of an effect on my family than on me".

He added: "My wife and I have been married for 48 years and together for more than 50 – we met as teenagers – and she never knew of this aspect of my life, so that headline in the newspaper was totally devastating for her and there is nothing I can say that can ever repair that."

Whatever pain she has suffered, Mrs Mosley has not spoken out since the publication of the story, nor has she attended court.

Even before her husband's inclinations were made public, she coveted a low profile, spending most of her time at their home in Monaco, and occasionally staying at their mews house in Chelsea.

Even during F1 races and social events, Mrs Mosley rarely made an appearance.

The daughter of a policeman from Streatham, she met Mosley at a party in London in 1959. They became engaged in June 1960 and married less than four weeks later. At the time, Mosley was reading physics at Oxford, and had not yet decided what he would do for a living.

When Jean was given tickets for a motor race at Silverstone, she took her husband along and he became hooked on the sport.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 July 2008 9:00 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Shave,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 00:11:59
The News of the World are well known for using dastardly tactics to get their 'stories'. F*** 'em.

A hearty slap on the back (but not in that way) to Mosley for pursuing this case.
2

Allan(handofgod137),

25/07/2008 00:33:07
Time the Murdoch press reported on real news stories anyway.
3

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 00:43:43
I don't like Max infact he's promoted way beyond his means ... but the news of the world needs to be bankrupted for this not just £60k but £2-£3 billion ... this is basically a family feud between the offspring of mosley and the offspring of Murdoch (a scottish name for a not so scottish family - check it out!) ... news papers should never be able to set up these things and get away with it - if they do they should be put out of business in the public interest ...

Today was not a dent in the 'freedom of the press' unfortunately it was not a gag on them 'constructing' stories nor abusing their power ...

What we are seeing is a soap opera .. it has nothing to do with max mosley but everything to do with his father. The newspapers ought to be doing something constructive with their power like examining inefficiency and corruption in local councils - but they would never do something as useful as that as long as they have someone doing some slap and tickle ! One costs us billions of pounds and the other is just curiosity .. I will leave you to decide where our efforts should be placed ....
4

,

25/07/2008 01:32:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

The Trossachs Hasher,

25/07/2008 02:31:36
Ohhh - yes - the News of the World got a sp***ing!! (Why can't I put this full word in - nothing wrong with it!!!!!)

About time too for this sleazy self important rag. Hopefully we will now be spared the tedious and predictable stories of Z list celebs being "kissed and told" on by money grabbing lowlifes who come and go more quickly than this weekly excuse for a newspaper.

and I agree with #3. The newspapers should be doing something more constructive like investigating the waste of millions of pounds of taxpayers money every year by inefficient, incompetent and corrupt local and national government.
6

Angoos,

Baku, Azerbaijan 25/07/2008 06:19:23
It makes me laugh when I read quotes from newspaper editors like those in this article saying investigative journalism is being "strangled to death".
Investigative jouranlism as defined by the News of The World is the ability to print lies, defame anyone's character that they see fit and claim that it is in the public interest. Who gives a monkeys cobblers whether Max Mosley likes a bit of slap and tickle ?
I would wage money that there are a few "investigative journalists" out there who have far greater skeletons in their closets than anyone they have had the audacity to "expose" in their tabloid rags !!
7

Boy Wonder,

25/07/2008 08:32:03
Don't care for Mosley at all ... but a slapdown for the NotW and all of the too-intrusive media is welcome. The public do not have a right to know everything ... and we certainly don't want to know about peoples' warped sex-lives!
8

Anne,

Eaglesham 25/07/2008 08:35:34
What the newspaper editor has singularly failed to do is to distinguish between "investigative" and "inventive" journalism.

Lying is never a good idea.
9

FC Barcelona,

25/07/2008 08:47:12
great news, that sumbag rag, news of the world is not fit to be used as bog roll !!
10

11+failed,

the pans 25/07/2008 08:49:35
Surprised that posters 1 to 10 are able to comment on this story since none of them would demean themselves by having read the Mosley story! Great story, caused more merriment in our office than even Curran's discomfort will do.
11

JG,

Fife 25/07/2008 09:02:12
I'm not a big fan of the tabloids either and I don't buy any of them but why was this man not openly ashamed of his general behaviour? He had a wee catch in his voice when he spoke on TV yesterday - I just felt sorry for his wife.
12

,

25/07/2008 09:07:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

25/07/2008 09:10:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

11+failed,

the pans 25/07/2008 09:22:02
15
The story was not made up! Nor was it ever claimed that it was. Mosley claimed that no reasonable person would be intolerant of, or fail to understand his behaviour and in the same breath that his wife was surprised and shocked. A man who can consistently lie and deceive his wife of 40+ years is not the ideal person to be fronting an international sport.
15

11+failed,

the pans 25/07/2008 09:27:00
15
Perhaps if you had read the story you would have been able to comment more accurately and sensibly! And without the need to revert to person abuse.
16

JG,

Fife 25/07/2008 09:29:03
Sorry, but if this man was MY husband he would currently be carrying his nuts around in a jar.
17

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 25/07/2008 09:41:56
#18
Maybe he does that already - it sounds kinky enough!
18

sceptic,

livingston 25/07/2008 09:45:07
14 15 Vincent
You want to curb the nasty press but be free to make your own insulting comments anonymously.
19

paulr,

edinburgh 25/07/2008 10:06:17
Long overdue and doesnt go nearly far enough, these lowlifes in the gutter press need putting down once and for all.
The public has no need or right to know about someone elses private life unless it directly affects public safety.
This was just slease, pay a tom thousands to spy on people then publish the salacious details to satisfy all the cowardly voyeurs out there.
20

traprain,

25/07/2008 10:11:49
18 JG,
Had Max been your husband he would probably have given you in excess £2,500 for that "pleasure".
21

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 10:16:31
20 - I don't see what your point is - and I in no way mean that to be insulting I just think you need to expand a little .. Are you saying that the press should be free to set up private individuals with hookers and film it and then publish it?

11 + I didn't read about it it has been forced down every F1 fans throat by ITV as well !?

It is evident that murdoch has a vendetta against mosley or at very least he is the vehicle being used to discredit him by someone who does has a vendetta against him (I don't know which is worse). How many unknown businessmen use high class hookers (if there can be such a thing) and nobody bothers? why mosley ?

Somebody wants rid of him - the investigative journalism is maybe to find out why instead of filming sex scenes ... but I guess the press are not interested in answers just sensationalism over decency which is hardy going to change the world into a better place.
22

Hibsterical,

25/07/2008 10:23:04
I have an alternative 'remedy' for newspapers who continue to flagrantly breach the law and their own code of practice: 3 strikes and out. After 3 breaches, remove their licence to publish a newspaper for a limited time - even one edition would have a big financial impact on a tabloid such as NoTW. If they continue to break the law, shut them down.
23

11+failed,

the pans 25/07/2008 10:35:40
23 Voldemort,
"Are you saying that the press should be free to set up private individuals with hookers and film it and then publish it?"
I do not say that, nor did it happen! Mr Mosley set up and paid £2,500 for the episode not the News of the World.
The question was whether the paper had embellished the story with Nazi connotations. The judge thought not. However, the pictures of women in prison garb and de-lousing were not fake. Many may think that there were semblances of concentration camp activities.
24

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 25/07/2008 10:50:34
We all take the high road and say we would never stoop so low as to read such rubbish but it is human nature that we want to know ALL the gruesome and gynaecological details of the sex lives of the rich and famous - and if they are gay or bisexual what a bonus for our salaciousness.

But I am glad that that filthy rag News of the World got fined because, as a former Prime Minister of Canada once said, "The laws of the land do not belong in the bedrooms of the nation." Pierre E. Trudeau
25

drew 33,

duddingston 25/07/2008 11:03:57
"Mr Mosley told the court, "totally devastating for her" when she read about his penchant for sadomasochistic sex with prostitutes"
Mr Mosley engaged in a little bit of roll playing that no reasonable person would question, according to his solicitor. He is entitled to behave as he pleases in private just so long as it is within the law.
Obviously his wife is an unusually sensitive person being "devastated" by being lied to for 48 years and only now hearing about his innocent little predilections.
26

hertscot,

25/07/2008 11:21:09
Everyone has a right to a private life, no matter how strange some of us think that is.
NOTW claimed this was in the public interest because of nazi connotations, an assertion that was proved to be false in court.

The NOTW went out of it's way to defame a human being, destroy his lofe and "devastate" his family.

So what he lied to his wife for 48 years, how long have our free press been lying to us, while they carry out the social and political agendas of the owners?
27

Here Today HBOS Tomorrow,

25/07/2008 11:33:22
I live abroad and the UK press is the constant butt of jokes, it is widely regarded as probably the worst of any so-called free country - and these comments come from people who have a deal with the media on a daily basis. It`s about time the UK press actually started printing real news in as an objective way as possible. But I guess big words and complex facts are beyond the scope of most News of the World readers. The sad state of Britain today is largely down to the media fueling fear, and pandering to the lowest common denominator.
28

drew 33,

duddingston 25/07/2008 11:36:21
28
"So what he lied to his wife for 48 years"
Possibly that was not the only thing that "devastated" his unfortunate wife, even if, as you think, there was nothing wrong with that.
29

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 11:57:32
The news of the world is a junk paper, written by junk journalists.

They have constantly taken pride in staging situations involving celebrities and then capitalising on them.

One of the first cases of this was when they stiched up Mick Jagger, Marianne Faithfull and Keith Richards at Keith's Sussex home, Redlands in 1967.

Luckily, the Stones had William Rees-Mogg on their side, whose Times article, "Who breaks a butterfly upon a wheel?" was instrumental in turning the tide in their favour. If this hadn't happened then the Rolling Stones could quite easily have ended there.

The NOTW planted various characters in the Stones' camp, who mysteriously dissappeared as soon as the police became involved. "Acid King" David Schneidermann was one of them I believe. I wouldn't be surprised if they had pulled a similar stunt with Max Moseley.
30

E300,

25/07/2008 11:58:46
#29 Here Today HBOS Tomorrow

Sadly the press can only print what people will buy. Obviously they think that if the "UK press actually started printing real news in as an objective way as possible" it would be a recipe for disaster.
31

,

25/07/2008 11:59:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

,

25/07/2008 12:03:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

Here Today HBOS Tomorrow,

25/07/2008 12:04:27
#32 E300 I fear you are totally right.

I think that when a newspaper crosses the line it should be publicly humiliated and for each day the lies or invasion of privacy story appeared it should be forced to have on the front page "We Lied" or something similar run for the duration. Plus the directors and editors should face a personal fine and prison, in addition to loss of advertising revenue equal to one days income for each day the story appeared.

I am all for investigative journalism, but beyond sex scandals and idle gossip the British press seems almost incapable of doing such things.
34

The Daleks,

Longmen 25/07/2008 12:28:36
Well done Max.

Pity the court didn't hit the Nudes of the World a lot harder.
35

hertscot,

25/07/2008 12:58:27
#30 the ins and outs of a couples private relationship and how they chose to conduct themselves within it is their business, what secrets they chose to keep from one and other is their business. Who did what to whom and why is their business.

She may have been enjoying the same thing, however my point was.....IT'S NONE OF OUR BUSINESS.
36

11+failed,

the pans 25/07/2008 13:02:37
33 Vincent-W
I take it that your are inferring, in the nicest possible way, that you passed your 11+. Perhaps you went on to master the Ablative Absolute, the Gaussian Elimination or the Laplace Transform. What that has to do with the story, is something I, from my disadvantaged position, have difficulty understanding.
The Nazi connection was the only part of the story which was found by the judge not to be proven while the rest was factually correct. Perhaps having the brother of my Grandmother machine gunned above a mass grave in Latvia has made me super sensitive to Mosley's Nazi antecedents. However, prison clothing and degrading "lice inspections" certainly have Nazi connotations for me, I am not familiar with prison routines so it might all have been "quite normal".
37

AJ Fife,

25/07/2008 13:08:04
The News of the World got what it deserved, but what about Mosely?

Surely a special Iron Cross first class with oak leaves should be struck, in honour of an OAP who can take on 5 prossies in one go!
38

JG,

Fife 25/07/2008 13:13:03
#39 AJ
AJ!!! I'd say you'll be getting the backs of your legs slapped for that, but apparently there could be a fee for that sort of thing!!!
39

,

25/07/2008 13:16:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
40

radge dug,

25/07/2008 13:36:06
Free press? Stuff them. These scum destroy peoples lives for profit. NotW/Sun and the others who print lies and propaganda, Scotsman included.
41

11+failed,

the pans 25/07/2008 13:49:19
41 Vincent-W
"Tomorrow they might make up stories about you taking part in nazi themed parties - what will you do about it?"

No problem, I'd sue them for printing lies!
42

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 14:30:38
You know - what if Max Mosley dressed up as 'goballs' (hehe) and goose stepped around behind closed doors inspecting people for who cares what! - so what ??!

Why does that effect his ability to do his job and why should we care what he does with his cash and his spare time ?! Why is this news ?

Why are folk so caught up in Nazi rubbish - they are never coming back to power! so what if a few folk still support them - it's their money and time to waste .... if we get 'offended' every time someone says boo to a goose then perhaps we need to stop and think why too ... Some folk really just need to get over the Nazi's - most of us did 50 years ago ... !

Folk make alot out being 'offended' these days mostly I have found in life that those who go around be 'offended' actually derive enjoyment from the fuss they create as a result of being 'offended' - ie they get off on it ... which is pathetic for a number of reasons but primarily because they are usually lacking substantially in importance but lacking nothing in self importance!

I agree with Vincent W - The press should be made to publish a front page for a week saying 'We Lied' and I liked the fine structure too and the fact that the staff responsible are held accountable. That is the way it should be .. and perhaps they would be a little more careful and caring about what they publish.

Well said VW.


43

Joe Macdelta.,

25/07/2008 15:13:59
Why do people want to read this sort of tripe in newspapers, I know I dont , I want real news and this does not measure up.
44

Paul R,

25/07/2008 15:36:05
Other than the fact he was married what is wrong with what he did? They are all adults and "it" happened behind closed doors. Even if there were Nazi links so what? Nobody was harmed.
45

doc broon,

south side 25/07/2008 15:47:08
i may be among the few who are glad this sort of story comes out into the open. People like Max Mosley should not hold such a high position and be getting paid mega amounts of money, and then strut around as though they are righteous. This was no lie, he did do this, whether it had nazi connotations is up to the individual to decide. If you want a job in the limelight you should expect any abnormal behaviour to come out. People who love F1 sport are looking for someone who they can take respect from and who are looking after the game. Someone who can lie to his wife for so many years just makes you never trust the man in anything he says again. We have the same situation with our SRU Chairman, who was caught being a naughty boy , and his wife like max mosley's believes everything he says. The same applies to him, how can we believe anything he says or trust him up at Murrayfield. As i say, i'm glad he has been identified as a liar to his family and the public.
46

Spoot,

Third rock pool on the left 25/07/2008 18:26:28
Mosley's behaviour was indefensible; he deserves a damned good thrashing ... errr.
47

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 18:27:47
47 - Eh ?

Some of the greatest leaders in the world have been/are avid 'womanizers' - Churchill had affairs all over the shop for crying out loud - would you fire him? Do you consider him a bad leader ? Could he be trusted ?

You are arguing because a man 'lies' to his wife he cannot be trusted anywhere else ?! -- where would you stop? - would a person be unsuitable to be prime minister if 'he' told his wife she looked beautiful one evening when she sniffling with the cold and flu ? - or would that be consider to be a kind 'lie' so it wouldn't upset the balance of things ?

Nobody is whiter than white and EVERYBODY has lied at some stage in their life ...

Don't forget boys will be boys - it doesn't make someone a bad person or an incompetent person if they are not as boring and as self righteous as you !
48

JG,

Fife 25/07/2008 19:10:30
#49 Voldemort
I kind of get your comment, but there's a huge difference between being nice to your wife when she's feeling below par and lying about nipping down to the local brothel for a session with 5 prostitutes and a selection of thrashing weapons!
Of course people lie from time to time but surely it depends on the sentiment behind it?
And as for the "boys will be boys" comment. Would you be quite so understanding if it had been a woman with 5 handsome gigolos?
49

,

25/07/2008 20:37:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
50

,

25/07/2008 21:28:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
51

indune1,

Canada 25/07/2008 22:02:11

Though I am no admirer of the Tabloid Press, my fear is that yesterday's verdict is going to make Mosley more of a dictator when comes to his iron-fisted rule of F-1 racing.

The man is an embarassment. Mercedes and BMW should demand his resignation for his stupid comments about Germans and their language.
52

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 25/07/2008 23:54:17
50 - ok point taken - all I am saying is a guys personal life rarely has any effect on his professional life - the two are divorced !

I am happily married and don't have 'affairs' nor do I visit or have ever visited prostitutes but if someone who works for me did I'd have no problem with it - it would make me trust them any less -- whether it was a man with 10 prostitutes or a woman who want 'de big bamboo' ! -- it is none of my business and I'll wager a good rodgering does everybody's work life a power of good !

I just loathe these self righteous twits who reckon if you breath wrong - should you happen to be in a position of power or in the public eye - you deserve to be publicly massacred ! They really don't get the big picture if you have to concentrate on a persons private life ...

A famous chap once said 'let him who is without sin cast the first stone' .... people are only too eager to see the downfall of those who have 'made it' and I think it is a sad, very negative and self lowering trait in human nature.

The press deserve to be 'less free' for not only this story but many other's like it ... the problem is nobody's 'clean' enough to take them to task ... here but by the grace of god (probably) it wasn't them caught in shenanigans with the opposite sex !
53

JG,

Fife 26/07/2008 00:35:15
#52 HC
Aye, not much change in attitude over the past 50 years eh? A bloke behaves like that and he's a "bit of a lad"; "an awfy boay". A woman does the same thing and she's a tart. Mind you, I watched "Unfaithful" on TV last night and see that Olivier Martinez guy - oosha bandit! And with a French accent........

#54 Voldemort
I'm not sure that your hypothetical employee's working and private lives would be entirely divorced. It would depend on how much he had to lie to get away with his shenanigans. And if someone can lie to the person closest to them and fool THEM, how do you know they're not fooling you too?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.