Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Keeping an eye on saving birds of prey

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 June 2008
LANDOWNERS and huntsmen are being persuaded to work with conservationists to reduce the number of birds of prey illegally killed on Scotland's private estates.

The RSPB is trying to orchestrate a change in attitudes among people who previously regarded the need to protect raptors as a "distraction" rather than a priority.

Although most land managers now welcome birds of prey, and have played a key role in the reintroduction of red kites, ospreys and sea eagles, a minority involved in game management are having a disproportionate impact on the conservation of some species, including golden eagles and hen harriers.

Now, in an unprecedented show of public unity, 12 bodies that play major roles in estate management and bird conservation have signed a pledge saying there should be no place in Scotland's future for the illegal killing of such birds.

Senior figures in the RSPB hope that the pledge will lead to significantly fewer numbers of endangered species such as golden eagles and hen harriers being poisoned, trapped or having their nests destroyed.

Last year was the worst yet for red kite poisoning, according to the record of incidents independently confirmed by the Scottish Agricultural Science Agency. The female of the only remaining pair of breeding golden eagles in the Borders was also poisoned with an illegal pesticide last August.

Duncan Orr-Ewing, the head of species at the RSPB, told The Scotsman: "Some of the landowning bodies are on board now, which is very welcome. In the past there has been an issue where the killing of birds of prey has been regarded as a bit of a distraction by a minority of people. But now they are realising this is an important issue, and we can all move forward on this."

James Reynolds, an RSPB spokesman, added: "It is a groundbreaking piece of work because historically there's been a bit of antagonism between the various organisations. This level of buy-in from landowners is a bit of a landmark in bringing an end to this problem.

"Now there is a real partnership happening; things are hopefully changing and it will mean there is a significant drop in the number of persecution incidents."

Michael Russell, the environment minister, launched the pledge in Cammo Park, Edinburgh, yesterday.

Mr Russell said: "Recent reports of the persecution of raptors have been very disturbing and the pledge I am signing today will be an important means of protecting these wonderful species.

"A recent report on wildlife crime also made a number of recommendations for government, prosecutors and the police, which I have been more than happy to accept."

Luke Borwick, chairman of the Scottish Rural Property and Business Association, said: "Our position is clear on illegal activity – it cannot be tolerated and we will work with the relevant agencies to eradicate wildlife crime."

The pledge was signed by the Scottish Rural Property and Business Association, National Farmers' Union Scotland, Edinburgh City Council, the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, Scottish Agricultural Science Agency, Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish Ornithologists' Club, Raptor Study Groups, Tayside Police, the Heather Trust, Scottish Raptor Study Group and the Countryside Ranger Service.

During the launch RSPB Scotland also unveiled a new buzzard nest viewing project, the first within city limits for Scotland.

Working together to combat illegal persecution

IN AUGUST last year The Scotsman teamed up with the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals to help catch those responsible for killing this country's birds of prey.

The campaign was triggered by the discovery of a dead golden eagle on an estate near Peebles in the Borders.

The Scottish Government joined the campaign after ministers pledged to step up efforts to stamp out wildlife crime, of which there were 275 reported cases last year.

Michael Russell, the environment minister, announced a review of the way wildlife crime was investigated and prosecuted.

The Royal Mail backed the effort by issuing ten stamps featuring examples of bird species, together with population figures showing how, in Britain, they had been driven to the edge of extinction and, in some cases, beyond, but had since recovered.

The latest organisation to come on board was the Argaty Red Kite Project in Perthshire, after three red kites were found poisoned and post-mortem examinations revealed extremely high levels of a toxin in their systems.






Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 June 2008 10:38 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Birds of prey
 
1

celtic4,

USA 26/06/2008 00:11:45
Glad to read there is finally some unity in saving these wonderful birds! Good job!
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 00:34:11

Nothing "Wonderful" about it celtic4, if we get,..

'Bird Flu' at our Door!
3

Beth Boyle,

NY 26/06/2008 05:16:56
#2 you are nuts! You don't get bird flu from birds of prey. They are not birds who go in flocks and they hate hanging around people!
4

yockel,

26/06/2008 06:18:26
#3 and Swans they go around in flocks do they?
5

LEAL,

26/06/2008 07:13:59
Of course no one wants to see bird species go extinct,but I have never seen a figure published by RSPB or anyone else for where they would like to see the raptor population reach.How many eagles buzzards kites etc would they like in Scotland.I think we have already to many buzzards.Could do with a few more eagles though.It would be nice to see an eagle occasionally.They dont wipe out local song bird populations the way flocks of a dozen buzzards do.
6

Andyfromedinburgh,

edinburgh 26/06/2008 07:39:37
#5

Thankyou for yr insights .... this has made me understand #3 in a whole new light. Perhaps there are others I should be more open to as well?

7

Augusta,

Kirkcaldy 26/06/2008 07:54:42
Raptorophilia is a sexual perversion, a projection
of sadistic impulses. Yuck!
8

gus1940,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 08:14:40
I have never been able to understand why the penalty for egg theft always seems to be higher by a factor of several 100% than that given to those who kill mature birds.

An egg can produce 1 bird and the mortality rate for immature birds is very high, whereas a mature bird having survived the perils of infancy can go on to produce eggs and in turn chicks for many years.

It would appear that logically the penalty for killing birds should be much higher than that for stealing eggs.

Egg thieves seem to end up behind bars quite frequently. How often do gamekeepers or their employers guilty of raptor slaughter see the inside of a cell?
9

yockel,

26/06/2008 08:31:11
#10 Gus, often the egg collectors have thousands.
#8 Momada, your point 5 is correct and is the RSPB's elephant in the corner just like disturbance and public access.
Britain no longer has the necessary habitat to support a lot of these birds and their food supply, other than buzzards that is.
Reintroduction schemes though great for press coverage do nothing to redress these issues. Sea Eagles fed shot rabbits daily because there is no fish in the sea, brilliant. If the habitat and the food was there no tinkering would be needed.
10

Nickscot,

26/06/2008 08:59:16
8# Buzzards may not "wipe out" song bird populations, however they do impact on them and can have a devestating effect on populations of ground nesting birds. If populations are left unchecked in areas they will just eat themselves out of house and home and the local population will collapse. Buzzards I would not classify as one of the stunning birds of prey such as the eagle or the merlin, certianly not when you see them waddling behind a tractor gorging themselves on worms along with the other scavenging seagulls and crows.

By all means protect them and prosecute the stupid minority who persecute them but to protect them to the detriment of other more fragile species seems hypocritical!
11

Boy Wonder,

26/06/2008 09:00:30
#5. Quote "I'll have you know that Charles is one of the most highly respected posters on this site."

Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! Never read anything so funny in my life! Chuckles is a 94 year-old senile dribbler with baby issues ... and my friend! He will never be "highly respected" ... he is LOVED regardless!!! Even by DYW ... and she's not all there either!

Now as regards the killing of raptors ... the law needs to come down really hard on those who choose to kill these magnificent birds and throw the book at them. Otherwise, the gamies and poachers won't care and will carry on.

Bird-flu?? Really Chuckles ... you're so far out there on this one, coming back will be difficult for you!

12

Lillig,

26/06/2008 09:07:38
Charles, remember the song from The Life of Brian - always look on the bright side of life, doo doo, doo doo doo doo doo doo.

I can't seriously believe you are proposing the killing of birds so we can avoid bird flu??!

Life without bird, especially those beautiful raptors, would be awful and anyone who says otherwise should buzz-ard off.
13

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 09:13:04

Coming back BW wont be difficult for me!

Here I AM!

A "Bird" is a "Bird" it flys and has two eyes!

Your just 'Jealous' because, People don't say such nice things about you!

And less of the DYW 'Mocking' thankyou very much!

Just because I have someone that Loves me and wants my Babies, does not make her 'Mad'!

Our "Babies" will be trained to,..'Bug the Pants' off you BW!,...

Soo,...'watch out!' :))
14

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 09:15:09

Lillig ~17,

I NEVER said I wanted to "Kill" anything, BW being the exception though! :)

15

Nickscot,

26/06/2008 09:23:30
There arent any since records began because we have never seen such high numbers! I do not profess to be an expert, just sticking my proverbial oar into a topic in which I have an interest!

You are correct I have done no research, just based it on a logical "animal kingdom" theory that once your main food source disappears, populations will dwindle and...(wait for influx of abuse)...they may turn on their own kind as a supplementary source!
16

yockel,

26/06/2008 09:24:52
#19 Nomada, just one example -

The Scottish Labour Party!
17

yockel,

26/06/2008 09:33:01
If you spend much time in rural central Europe you will begin to see just how marginal Scotland is for a lot of our wildlife. It doesn't take much to push populations over the edge here. Even the red deer our emblematic monarch of the glen is a scabby, scrawny, tick ridden waif compared to it's European forrest dwelling cousin. Domolish a few towns and give the wildlife a chance.
18

Partan,

Fife 26/06/2008 09:58:51
I've spent a bit of time in Germany over the years and can assure you that Scotland is nowhere close in terms of raptor density. I'm not aware of any wailing and gnashing of teeth over this "problem".
Apart from the sheer numbers of all types of birds , in and immediately around the town I visited, I saw kestrel, hobbies,sparrowhawk,buzzards,red and black kite and was also lucky on one occasion to see a goshawk. As someone with an interest in these things, I can say that there was no evident shortage of songbirds.
#21 Raptors do kill other raptors, either as prey or for territorial reasons.
19

Tweedmouth,

Coldstream 26/06/2008 10:14:58
Seeing predators as being 'separate' from their prey is a misunderstanding of nature. Predator and prey have evolved together for hundreds of thousands of years. They are tied to each other by evolution and both benefit from the relationship. The predator kills off the old, the sick - the weak or the 'sub-standard' prey. That is why most wildlife you see looks amazingly fit and well. The predator is the 'police agent' which enforces speed, agility and awareness in the prey population. Some years ago the RSPB caight every bluetit in an isolated woodland - all 400 of them - and weighed and recorded their health. The 'normal' weight was remarkably consistent, but about 10% were 'overweight' or 'underweight'. They caught and re-weighed the birds many times over the year and it was clear that any bird that fell outside the 'norm' was the first to be killed and eaten by a sparrowhawk.
In effect the predator is enforcing a standard of speed, agility, awareness and health in the bluetit population. It is exactly the same for buzzards and rabbits, peregrines and pigeons, lions and gazelles, sharks and sealions. You can see this in Attenborough's documentaries: when lions hunt Springboks, the gazelles deliberately 'prong' high in the air in front of the lions; it is a kind of 'showing off' - by which the prey is 'saying' "don't bother trying to hunt me, because I'm super fit and you'll just waste energy". So the lion goes after the old, the sick, the weak, the lame.

Predator and prey are not 'separate'; they are joined in the 'oldest relationship' in the world.
20

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

26/06/2008 11:06:16
The people who illegally shoot or kill these birds (or any animal) should be tarred and feathered...then sent back to their master who should be fined a huge sum of money that WILL leave a dent in his/her sporran....

If they make cash by having half wits come and shoot defenceless creatures on their land for a jolly old wheeze....then they are without a doubt keen to preserve the poor ignorant victims that nest on their land....

Ok, so they own the land...

...but they dont own the birds of prey now folks do they?
21

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 26/06/2008 11:34:52
> Mr Russell said: "Recent reports of the persecution of raptors have been very disturbing"

I know. I can't sleep for worry.

22

sam the god,

26/06/2008 11:38:09
#27 canker

So anyone that shoots animals should be tarred and feathered (will this include people who catch and kill fish?) this is the sort of statement I have come to expect from you totally irrational and counter productive. Yes I shoot birds and animals as I enjoy eating them I also catch fish to eat them for the same reason. I take it that you are a vegan? or are animals breed for your dinner table deemed all right it is about time you take a long good look at yourself before making general rash statements.
23

Animal82,

26/06/2008 12:14:07
#30

Completely agree. there are a lot of hypocritical people in this world.
24

,

26/06/2008 12:19:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

nabodican,

Rural Scotland 26/06/2008 12:57:53
While it is always good to hear of positive action being taken tp prevent illegal killing of raptors, what about the legal killing of these birds sponsored by the Scottish Government as they permit more and more huge wind turbines all over Scotland.
These things while not being very good at generating electricity make very efficient bird mincers and are responsible for the killing of thousands of birds every year.
The Scottish Government seem to be very pleased with themselves on this, especially Jim Mather.
26

sam the god,

26/06/2008 13:39:30
#32 nomada

At no point did I say I shot raptors I only shoot legitimate quarry and vermin species. The farm that I shoot on has plenty of buzzards which line up in the trees next to the farm buildings when I go out this is because they know that I gut anything that I intent to eat and place the dead vermin at this location this gives them an nice easy free meal.
27

stoatsnest,

Ham 26/06/2008 13:47:00
I am very heartened by the enlightened attitude of the majority of the bloggers.
As for the 'let's kill animals' people, we have plenty here in England. Let's hope they see the error of their ways some time.
28

sam the god,

26/06/2008 14:05:06
#36

are you a vegan or does someone else kill your food for you?
29

Nickscot,

26/06/2008 14:27:58
#38 yes they do, under common law you own up to the heavens and down to the centre of the earth (or something along those lines).
30

Mikko,

Drumnadrochit 26/06/2008 15:42:13
The sad thing is that if landowners stop shooting and poisoning them they'll all be minced up by Gordo's massive new mega windfarms anyway. Ie. cat food whichever way you look at it.
31

Mikko,

Drumnadrochit 26/06/2008 15:43:39
#39 sorry but you don't even own the mineral rights to your own land, let alone heaven and earth. Check your deeds.
32

Nickscot,

26/06/2008 16:00:13
#42 Not true (entirely) You are correct there are some statutory reservations in respect of coal and other minerals but this does not apply to all minerals. If it did there would be no commercial extraction of sand, gravel, hard rock etc in the UK and it is big business in Scotland! (Coal was privatised some time ago you know!)
33

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

26/06/2008 17:27:24
30...Sammy boy... yea of little brain and memory, I have already answered your question re my being vegan.. Please read my post again and note...I have stated those who illegally kill birds and animals...now if you are getting your Y's in a twist over this, perhaps your knee jerk reaction was exposing something you'd rather we not know about...I have my views on people who hunt in general..legally or illegal, as you know..but this article is re "I.L.L.E.G.A.L...K.I.L.L.I.N.G"...has it sunk in yet?...

A rather telling post from you...Sammy boy...
34

Tobytoo,

Southington, U.S.A. 26/06/2008 18:56:27
#25 If your attitude is "it's only an animal afterall"
I feel sorry for you for surely you have no feelings towards any animial and I find that to be very sad.
35

sam the god,

26/06/2008 18:57:15
#44 canker & #45 nomada
I was just clarifying that I shoot, and just to let people know that the vast majority of people that shoot do so legally as opposed to people tarring us all the same as a few bad apples (as like all walks of life).
Canker I have my views of vegans but should we class them all as the recent case where a vegan set of parents failed to give their children vitamin supplements resulting in the children becoming very ill and being taken into care. Do we now say vegan equals child cruelty.

36

dido-bendigo,

Scotland 26/06/2008 21:25:39
I wonder if Emily Pykett consulted with the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust (Scotland) before she wrote this piece lauding the RSPB? There was an extensive research excercise conducted on a grouse moor in the Borders some years ago. The result was a disaster for the moor and it became a blackspot regarding grouse, hen harriers, curlew and lots more species. The RSPB couldn't wait for the official news to come out, it showed their ideas were unsustainable. Instead they issued a statement pre-empting the release of bad news (for them). Recent research shows that keepered grouse-moors hold greater numbers of endangered moorland species that any RSPB managed plot. In fact one RSPB reserve comes out as holding the lowest numbers! Why? Because they don't control predators! Was this article yet another pre-emptive strike? Is it a case of the truth hurting RSPB egos? Sporting shooting conserves all moorland species. Eat grouse, 10,000 foxes, hen harriers and buzzards can't be wrong!
37

Horrible Cankers at the Cyber Shebeen,

26/06/2008 22:06:14
47...Sam,...sigh...do we say that parent meat eaters who force their children to eat meat when they do not want to are guilty of child cruelty?...parents who bring their children up on a rotten diet of animal flesh (McDonalds etc)are guilty of child cruelty...particularly without enlightening said child as to the origins of their 'Dino-nuggets?'...damn right....

Anyone who hunts for 'sport' and not for food is a sicko needing a good thrashing...

I never said I was vegan Sam...
38

sam the god,

26/06/2008 22:26:43
#49 canker
guess what if read my posts you would notice i shoot to eat or for vermin control and you are right mc rats are sh*te at least my children get good quality food so no child cruelty there

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.