Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Bill will open way to cash claims for asbestos victims

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 June 2008
JUSTICE Secretary Kenny MacAskill is to unveil a new bill at Holyrood which will entitle anyone in Scotland to raise an action if they contracted an asbestos-related condition called pleural plaques, a scarring of the lungs.
But the move is set to trigger a row with insurers this week as it will effectively overturn a ruling preventing workers claiming millions of pounds of compensation for the condition.

The ruling will help hundreds of men – mostly former workers in
shipyards – who suffer from diseases such as mesothelioma, a condition which people with pleural plaques are prone to catch.

The Lords ruled last year that former workers with pleural plaques were not entitled to compensation because the condition itself is not a disease.

But MacAskill's decision has infuriated insurers, who claim that, as pleural plaques does not itself cause any harm, there should not be any compensation – levels of which could reach millions of pounds.

Industry sources are also warning that the move could set a precedent for anyone with a condition to claim compensation even if it does not directly cause any harm. They point out that they do already compensate people with pleural plaques who then go on to contract a more serious condition.

However, the move will be met with delight by campaigners for the Clyde shipyard workers, opening up the possibility that they will be able to claim several million pounds in compensation.

Glasgow lawyer Frank Maguire claims to have 600 clients who have contracted the condition who, he says, will all lodge claims for damages. Sufferers could be entitled to around £15,000 each in compensation, a possible total of £9m.

Maguire insists that pleural plaques is just the "calling card" for more serious conditions and that people who have it should therefore be compensated.

A Scottish Government spokesman confirmed that the plans would be unveiled this week. He said: "The Justice Secretary has already made clear the Scottish Government's determination to reverse the House of Lords judgement and ensure that people with pleural plaques can continue to raise an action for damages."

He went on: "It is right that those who suffer the effects of asbestos as a result of our industrial past are able to claim for damages and we will introduce a bill before recess as we promised to right this wrong."

However, an insurance industry source said: "Everyone agrees that people with serious asbestos-related illnesses like mesothelioma should be compensated as quickly as possible. Insurers do this. But the medical community, and the House of Lords, agree that pleural plaques are symptomless, cause no harm to those who have them and do not lead to the development of any other asbestos-related medical conditions.

"By pursuing this bill on a point of principle Kenny MacAskill risks damaging Scotland's financial services competitiveness – in direct contrast to the reassurance of Alex Salmond and John Swinney during Global Financial Services Week less than a month ago. The Government should rethink their approach."

The Holyrood bill will put Gordon Brown under massive pressure to now follow suit at Westminster.

The bill is certain to pass as it is backed by both Labour and the Liberal Democrats in the Scottish Parliament.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 June 2008 8:14 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: Asbestos
 
1

Pilrig.,

Livingston 22/06/2008 06:16:33
" By pursuing this bill on a point of principle Kenny MacAskill risks damaging Scotland's financial services competitiveness"

Sez it all: The health of the workforce takes second place to profits.
2

ultravires,

Edinburgh 22/06/2008 12:17:39
Tough call.

Some of those insurers also insure Departments of the Scottish Government.

Lets hope that [undisclosed] relationship doesn't affect the planned legislation.

Remind me which firm insures Mr McGuire and his legal firm ?
3

,

23/06/2008 15:07:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.