Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Anger over Fraser bid to overturn conviction

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 November 2008
A NEW attempt by Nat Fraser to overturn his conviction for arranging the murder of his estranged wife was condemned by her family yesterday.
Fraser is serving a minimum of 25 years for hiring a killer to strangle Arlene Fraser at their home in New Elgin, Moray.

He has already lost an appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh, and is trying to take the case to the Privy Counci
l in London. He needs leave from the Edinburgh court, and after hearing submissions yesterday, judges there reserved their decision on his request.

After the hearing, Mrs Fraser's father, Hector McInnes, 67, said: "I do not think he has much of a chance. I think he will be pleading insanity next to get off with it."

Mrs Fraser, 33, disappeared in 1998, after waving off her two children to school. She and her husband had separated a few weeks earlier, after he assaulted her on her return from a night out. It was feared she had been killed, so Fraser could avoid a costly divorce settlement, but a massive police investigation failed to trace her body.

Some five years later, Fraser was put on trial, convicted and jailed for life. In 2006 he was freed pending an appeal.

The appeal was heard last year, and at the end of the submissions, his bail was withdrawn and he was returned to jail after 19 months of freedom.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 October 2008 9:02 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Arlene Fraser murder
 
1

2Right,

On Location 01/11/2008 03:23:17
The Jury being deprived the evidence of the two police saying the rings were in the house from the start has denied him a fair hearing under Holland & Sinclair and is contrary to his section 6 right to a fair hearing and his conviction should be quashed.

Should this happen then the Crown have the option to ask to re-try him and this is the way matters should proceed under current legislation and test cases.

The advocte that tried him "Turnbull" has even stated: If he had known of the evidence of the two police at the time of the trial he would have "FAINTED" Since he is still standing he couldn't have known of the evidence so the court did not hear the full case thus a fundamental irregularity occurred and his conviction cannot stand

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.