Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Former entrance to meat market erected again at new offices

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 May 2009
THE archways which stood for 120 years above the entrance to one of the city's historic meat markets have been returned to their former home.
The stone archways were carefully dismantled when the Fountainbridge meat market building, latterly occupied by restaurant Fat Sams , was demolished two years ago to make way for the Exchange Place office development.

Now, following months of rest
oration work, they have been re-erected on what is now a walkway leading through the financial quarter.

Work to recreate the two archways with their original look has been taking place for the last two months on the site of Exchange Place, the three offices behind the existing Scottish Widows headquarters.

When they were dismantled in 2007, each piece was taken into storage and now rebuilt.

Peter Bowman, a partner at Edinburgh-based Cre8architecture, the firm that designed the development, has masterminded the return of the arches.

He said: "They've been reconstructed on Fountainbridge, where they've always been, as a separate free-standing archway through one of the pedestrian routes into the development.

"It was like a reverse jigsaw carefully taking down the three arches, cleaning up all the stone work, identifying what was the original 1880s sandstone from the slightly poorer quality stuff added in the 1920s, and bringing it all back to life."

Scottish Widows Investment Partnership (SWIP), the site developer, had to get listed building consent to demolish the old Fat Sam's building.

"We want to show what the original historic monument was like," said Mr Bowman. "If it had been left as it was it would have continued to decay. I hope this will give the arches another 120 years' life.

"It would have been easy to say 'don't touch them – leave them where they are', but they will now have a much more positive contribution to the walkways and cycleways of Edinburgh as this links to the Millennium Way.

"It's one of these things cities need – things that stop you and make you want to find out more."

The restoration of the archways was a key part of the £50m scheme, which has created 210,000 square feet of office space and 6000sq ft of retail space.

Scott Moncrieff, one of Scotland's leading accountancy firms, has become the first tenant of the new development.

SWIP was not willing to disclose how much the restoration of the archways cost. A spokeswoman for the firm said: "All restoration costs were factored into the overall development cost."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 May 2009 9:56 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Architecture
 
1

Mallory,

Edinburgh 22/05/2009 12:07:23
Its not at the 'former home'. The Meat Market arch is at the east side of the empty office block development and casts shadows over exiting dwellings.
2

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 22/05/2009 12:47:06
I can remember this place when it was at its best and very busy,but what a stink came from it,but it did have a lovely archway.
3

Fi,

22/05/2009 13:51:31
I'm glad to hear that something with an historic connection has been saved and restored instead of being tossed in a skip. I'm hopeful that there's something of the old Fat Sam logo there as well.

I used to work with the artist who drew the logo, and it'd be nice to hear that there was a link from the meat market through to the more modern history of the area.

Oh, and just before I sign off... #1 the whole area is built up, shadows are a fact of life in a city centre and the whole zone has been under redevelopment for about 20 years.

Dry your eyes. If you want a nice view of Arthur's Seat, or the sea, and a pretty old historical eyesore building across the street to admire, move house, it's a free country.
4

elayne,

22/05/2009 13:57:24
been to a few meat markets in my day!
5

Buttress,

22/05/2009 14:05:05
"Scottish Widows Investment Partnership (SWIP), the site developer, had to get listed building consent to demolish the old Fat Sam's building."

There was a time when listing meant that demolition was only ever carried out in exceptional circumstances. It seems it's routine in Edinburgh now, as long as some 'economic' case can be made, ie developer profits. What happened to the national policy designed to protect listed buildings I wonder?

Where is Historic Scotland in all this demolition?
6

Statsman,

Edinburgh 22/05/2009 16:45:45
Another fingers up from the council and their developer chums to the residents of the Chalmers Buildings. The way that building has been boxed in is ridiculous.
7

THE BPRENTICE,

22/05/2009 17:12:36
excellent post Buttress - says it all really.
8

Jamie Dunne,

Edinburgh 22/05/2009 19:06:13
Whatever happened to only listing buildings of some importance? Exactly why was Fat Sam's a listed building in the first place? It was a horrible mess of a building and my recollection is that it had fallen into disuse as the city's clubbing and restaurant scene moved to George Street.

If you're going to list the whole city, there has to be a way around listings.
9

Buttress,

22/05/2009 20:38:43
I suggest that you look at why buildings are listed, the reasons are many, and no doubt the reason why that one was will be available if you seek advice from Historic Scotland.

Disuse is no reason why a building cannot be listed, and why should there be a 'way round' listings?
10

Jamie Dunne,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 19:27:25
Because otherwise we can never build anything new, considering how many buildings are listed nowadays.

Disuse is a reason for not keeping a building listed if it cannot be put to good use. Lots of pretty yet empty buildings are no use to anyone. Not that this one was pretty.

Historic Scotland have nothing on their website about it, but surely the listing was to do with the arch, which was retained.
11

Buttress,

25/05/2009 06:22:30
Well, if you live in a historic city with listed buildings expect that they will be retained.

No, disuse isn't a legal reason, and eventually buildings find a re-use usually.

Buildings are not normally listed simply because of one feature.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.