Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Pressure on industry after Miss England speaks out

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 February 2007
THE British fashion industry came under renewed pressure yesterday from those inside the fashion and arts industries over the use of size-zero models in catwalk shows.
As London Fashion Week entered its second day, Miss England criticised the use of "gaunt-looking" models and one of the country's leading ballet schools contrasted its own ban on overly-skinny dancers with designers continued use of severely under we
ight girls on the catwalk.

Eleanor Glynn, 20, said the fashion industry had a responsibility towards young girls who idolise models. Ms Glynn, who was crowned Miss England last July, said that despite being a size eight to ten she had been rejected for a number of modelling jobs. She said: "They seem to have been going for the gaunt, almost cocaine look for the past few years and I think it is time we have variation.

"It affected me at one point until I won Miss England, but the girls who don't have other doors opening can fall on eating disorders ... we are almost being brain washed at the moment into believing this is reality.

Her comments came as the English National Ballet School trumpeted its own ban on under weight students.

Jane Hackett, the school's director, said: "If a girl or boy looks too thin or unhealthy, they are not allowed to perform at all. As performing is the main motivation for these young, talented people, it quickly has the desired effect."

In London yesterday posters offering help for anorexia and bulimia were pasted on walls backstage at several London fashion shows, while one restaurant popular with the fashion crowd said it was offering free food to models to try and get them to eat more.

And as the controversy over the glorification of underweight women continued, it emerged the Hollywood star Kate Winslet is taking legal action against the magazine Grazia over claims that she had been visiting a diet doctor to help her lose weight.

The English actress, who has always insisted that she was happy with her body is suing the publication, stating that not only was it not true but also that she was concerned about the effect the article might have on impressionable young fans.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 February 2007 3:09 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Anorexia
 
1

Media 1,

cape town 13/02/2007 06:44:29

The industry DOES NOT have any responsibility regarding young girls.

Parents and the children themselves are accountable for their own actions and that is that. If I dedicate my life to building a fashion house, if I design the most wonderful clothing and then decide to employ a zero size model to advertise it on my behalf, that is my perogative. I do not force you to purchase the garments,nor do I dictate to you that size zero is better than any other size.

I can not force you to purchase the magazines, I cannot force you to watch FTV and I cannot force to stop eating. If you suffer from a mind so weak that a size zero model causes you mental problems or even the need to speak out, then your issues are so deep rooted and out of control you should be spending your hard earned money on therapy as opposed to beauty magazines and pastry pies.

2

Sinnerman,

Another Planet 13/02/2007 07:21:19

Media 1

I agree. There is an increasing tendency to focus responsibility away from the individual, then you have somebody to sue.

3

Turkey Jerky,

13/02/2007 09:15:38

As stated in london fashion week article, If they try to ban thin people from magazines they should also ban unhealthily fat people appearing as well. Only normal mundane average and acceptable body shapes should be allowed. How does this bode for the future?

I am not too worried though, soon enough all the politicians and campaigners will reach the end of their assuredly already over-ripe lives. Old people will die and the young will be able to implement their newer smarter plans and ideals.

4

Yane,

melbourne 13/02/2007 10:12:05

#1 Media 1 Why are ya so worked up over this?
There's plenty o porn & stick mags around for ya -- all the weirdness you could want.

5

McMicrogal,

13/02/2007 11:04:46

The root of the problem is that we have so many bad designers out there. They claim that their clothes look better on very tall, thin models, does this not suggest that they are poor designers if they cannot create designs that will look good on a 5'2" size 12?

6

Scaramouche,

13/02/2007 11:23:23

When I was a child, the numbers 36-24-36 figured prominently as the ideal female shape. Who changed it to 12-12-12 and why???

My wife claims she can still fit into a size 10 .... and I'm about to get slapped for suggesting that's metres!

7

Gusto,

13/02/2007 12:05:00

Why not use robots? - thats what they are anyway! mincing along a catwalk looking as miserable as possible - then you can make them as thin as the twisted gay wierdoes that run their lives want them to be.... for 6,000$ for a 30 second mince, they'd cut their arms off if it meant more money.
No breasts, no brains - they need looking after!

8

Media 1,

cape town 13/02/2007 13:08:53

Leave the skinny models be. Society always protects the ones they pity, or the ones they see as the least advantaged.

Society feels sorry for Africa because she is poor, it does not seem to matter that she is poor due to irresponsible governance and corruption.

Society protects women's rights, it does not seem to matter that men have spent millenia creating industry.

Society feels sorry for black people, it does not matter that the white guy or the Asian guy may be more qualified, it only matters that the black guy is not discriminated against.

Society protects fat people, it does not matter that some skinny people do not like themselves. It does not matter that skinny people get abuse hurled at them, it only matters that fat people are protected from abuse.

Society gives religion a platform, yet atheism receives no platform.

Society gives the holocaust more attention than need be, yet there is no world Hiroshima or Nagasaki day. No Zimbabwe or Rwanda day.

Funny old world is this!

9

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 13/02/2007 15:51:40

#1 Couldn't agree more, I'm so sick of people deflecting blame away from themselves for their actions and this is one of the most pertinent examples. If young girls are stupid enough to replicate this behavior it is noone elses fault except their parents and theirs.
#4 Your pathetic

10

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 13/02/2007 15:52:55

#9
Just read that, couldn't agree anymore

11

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 13/02/2007 19:35:57

A typical answer for someone who has no argument against

12

Mahmoud Moosa,

13/02/2007 23:42:58

wax lyrical all you like, the message from the industry is that in orer to buy their beautiful clothes you have to be a stick thin giraffe.

and as for miss england - yet another media exercise / money making load of codswallop for and by girls like the endearing and classy bird who was on Celebrity Big Brother a coupel of weeks by and has done nothing bar sh*g an ageing footballer and flash her t*ts - THE UK MEDIA AN FASHION INDUSTRY is telling, brainwashing, inoctrinating our girls into believing that they must aspire to a visual image if they are to be a success in life - f*ck the brains, intellect, class and anything else - it's ok and you'll get on fine if you look the part, you can act anyway you like, be thick as pig sh*t, take drugs, f*rt, swear and have no talent at all - just look the part and everything will be fine.

Shallow indeed.

13

Stu_R_20,

Edinburgh 14/02/2007 13:31:52

#14 must be american
#15 some women believe this sort of behavior is empowering


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.