Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Drink kills eight Scots a day

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 July 2009
ALCOHOL is killing one Scot every three hours, figures showed yesterday as the leader of Scotland's doctors challenged MSPs to support plans to increase the price of cheap drinks.
The new study found that one in 20 deaths in Scotland is linked to alcohol – twice the level previously estimated.

Among those aged 35 to 44 the toll was even higher, with 26 per cent of deaths in men and 21 per cent in women associated with alcoh
ol consumption.

Dr Peter Terry, chairman of the British Medical Association in Scotland, said the nation was "awash with alcohol" and the effects were "crippling" the NHS.

Speaking at the BMA's annual conference in Liverpool, he called on MSPs of all parties to back controversial measures to introduce a minimum price per unit of alcohol – or come up with something else to tackle the problem.

The research published yesterday is the first of its kind, including the whole range of illnesses and accidents linked to alcohol consumption.

The study, published by ISD Scotland, identified 53 conditions ranging from cancers to strokes, assaults and road deaths where alcohol played a role.

The researchers reanalysed data from 2003 based on new methods of calculating the damage caused by alcohol.

They found there were 2,882 deaths in Scotland thought to be linked to alcohol, compared with the previous estimate of just 1,525 for that year.

There were 1,080 deaths in people under the age of 55.

Young people were more likely to die from an acute condition such as an injury linked to alcohol use rather than from a chronic condition.

However, one in ten of all deaths in those aged 35 to 44 was linked to alcoholic liver disease.

The research also found 41,414 people were discharged from hospital due to alcohol consumption – more than one in 20 of patients over the age of 16, and 50 per cent higher than previous figures.

The report also estimated drinking at moderate levels had some benefit in preventing deaths from heart disease. It suggested that 1,493 heart disease deaths may have been prevented in this way, but the report warned that even drinking at low levels was a risk factor for other conditions.

Health secretary Nicola Sturgeon said: "This research shows alcohol misuse is taking an even higher toll on Scotland's health than previously thought.

"To have one in 20 Scots dying from alcohol-related causes is a truly shocking statistic.

"Drinking alcohol is part of Scottish culture but it's clear that many people are drinking too much and damaging their health in the process."

Dr Terry said the figures showed the "true hidden human cost" of alcohol misuse in Scotland.

He added: "

Scotland is awash with alcohol and the consequences are crippling the health service. The scale of the problem needs radical solutions. A wide-ranging strategy is essential, but alongside public health education and awareness raising, a central part of this strategy is to introduce minimum price per unit of alcohol.

"Legislation on price is the only proven way to help change behaviour and end the heavy-drinking culture that is blighting our health service."

Dr Terry, who is a consultant in Aberdeen, said the SNP government would need the support of other parties to pass legislation to introduce a minimum price per unit of alcohol and he implored them to back the proposals.

"Any MSP that does not support the proposed legislation on minimum unit price has to come up with a suggestion that will have as much evidence in influencing this problem, and I don't think they can," he said.

But Scottish Conservative health spokeswoman Mary Scanlon said: "It is important in the light of these figures that the Scottish Government stops relying on minimum pricing as a single tool solution.

"We urgently need better education about the harm which alcohol can cause and rehabilitation programmes based on abstinence and recovery."

53 WAYS DRINK CAN KILL YOU

CONDITIONS WHOLLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION:


Alcohol induced pseudo Cushing's Syndrome

Wernicke's encephalopathy

Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of alcohol

Degeneration of nervous system due to alcohol

Alcoholic polyneuropathy

Alcoholic myopathy

Alcoholic cardiomyopathy

Alcoholic gastritis

Alcoholic liver disease

Alcohol induced chronic pancreatitis

Fetus and newborn affected by maternal use of alcohol

Fetal alcohol syndrome

Excessive blood level of alcohol

Toxic effect of alcohol

Accidental poisoning by and exposure to alcohol

Intentional self poisoning by, and exposure to alcohol

Poisoning by and exposure to alcohol, undetermined intent

Evidence of alcohol involvement determined by blood alcohol level

Evidence of alcohol involvement determined by level intoxication

CONDITIONS PARTLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION:

Cancer of the lip

Cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx

Oesophageal cancer

Colorectal cancer

Cancer of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts

Laryngeal cancer

Breast cancer

Hypertensive diseases

Coronary heart disease

Cardiac arrhythmias

Haemorrhagic stroke

Ischaemic stroke

Oesophageal varices

Mallory-Weiss syndrome

Unspecified liver disease

Portal hypertension

Cholelithiasis

Acute and other chronic pancreatitis

Psoriasis

Spontaneous abortion

Epilepsy and Status epilepticus

Road traffic accidents - non pedestrian

Pedestrian traffic accidents

Water transport injuries

Fall injuries

Occupational work/machine injuries

Firearm injuries

Drowning

Inhalation and ingestion of food causing obstruction of respiratory tract

Fire injuries

Accidental excessive cold

Accidental poisoning by and exposure to noxious substances

Intentional self-harm(Event of undetermined intent

Assault









Page 1 of 1

 
1

Iainbroch,

01/07/2009 00:25:13
Ah What a list of Union Dividends!
2

Mugg,

Poole 01/07/2009 00:46:32
Nice list! Damn shame about those people dying, were any TAX payers apart from the alcohol they bought and were their lives that boring to turn to that?
3

Fifi la Bonbon,

01/07/2009 00:49:34
#2 is entirely correct.

When Scotland wins back its freedom from the accursed enemy there will be no more Spontaneous abortion, Epilepsy and Status epilepticus, Road traffic accidents - non pedestrian, Pedestrian traffic accidents, Water transport injuries, Fall injuries, Occupational work/machine injuries, Firearm injuries, Drowning, Inhalation and ingestion of food causing obstruction of respiratory tract, Fire injuries, Accidental excessive cold... all caused bhy the union and all entirely preventable.

Mister Salmond will lead us to the promised land.
4

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 01:23:21

Just Please!!, Put it into the right context, and Stop trying to brainwash us all with the Political Correctness!
How Many Scots die in Road Accidents everyday!?
How Many Scots die, from Heart Disease everyday!?
The list can go on forever, I will not bore you all, but I am dammed certain, it is more than "eight_a_Day"!

So Just STOP!!, The Justifying, of Proposed super-taxing, of Alcohol, to-which is of grotesque injustice, to penalize the majority for the few!, the "few", who find it fit to abuse alcohol!

5

,

01/07/2009 01:30:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 01:50:14

~6 Jorina,

Agreed!, Our Hardened abusers of alcohol, are more the likes, to have started using abusive drinking alcohol, to escape the misery in their lives, to-which may have been no-fault of their own.

7

famie,

australia 01/07/2009 03:38:08
The Scots are a colonized nation and their alcohol consumption is a direct effect of this. The heartache and damage that has been done to many fine people is something I can never forget no matter how far from the homeland. Not only that alcoholism has repurcussions that continue to damage families from one generation to the next. I speak from first hand experience. In Australia the alcoholism among the indigenous peoples and those at the bottom of the ladder would be much the same I would suspect. Until people have their basic needs met there is little chance that they will function to their potential. This seems highly unlikely in the social climate of today where greed has been the force brought more misery to more people than ever before and those who caused this deluge walk away unscathed in most cases. A social revolution is well over due but with the masses so ill equipped both in health and intellect it remains a pipe dream.
8

!Ya basta!,

01/07/2009 04:21:35
Raising prices may be part of the solution but of course we need a more sustained and comprehensive campaign.

Some of the above comments are pathetic ranging from Linksaills denial to Famies blame the English.

Wake up and smell the coffee Scotland. Far too many people drink far too much far too often. Drink plays a far too big role in our culture these days and the rest of the worlds knows it and rightly takes the pi** out of us for it. We are becoming a caricature of ourselves.

We need to kick the habit, get out the damn Pub and get a real life instead of using drink as an emotional crutch, running away from reality all the time and blaming others.



9

,

01/07/2009 05:50:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

blackops,

01/07/2009 05:58:12
it should be personal choice - if you want to drink then drink, the results are clear. its just further pushing into the nanny state.
11

fife runner,

01/07/2009 06:47:12
oh well 11 postings so far and the majority still taking it seriously. Or is this just a snapshot of our society which itself doesnot take the issue seriously

I could hardly say my uncle and good friend who died of aclcohol related disease or my father in law who suffers alcohol realted alzheimers had boring lives.

12

an interested party,

01/07/2009 07:13:41
I estimate the majority take it seriously

the 'few' dont


adding as much as 20% to the price of drink wont suddenly turn the 'few' into cash rich fitness freaks
13

Baillie Guthrie,

Caithness 01/07/2009 07:27:02
We all suffer terrible tragedies and disappointments in our lives and on balance alcohol serves as, if you like, a useful crutch to social and business life.

Imagine a céilidh or a Burns supper or a St Andrews night, independence celebration, or even a wet Wednesday evening in Caithness without a glass of Highland malt.

awa' ye go.
14

GeeJay,

Ugchelen 01/07/2009 07:57:59
Alcohol abuse is prevalent in almost every western country whether expensive, like Norway, or cheap, like Greece. Price can influence alcohol (ab)use but only ever so slightly. I think the social circumstance link is more important than the price link.
15

sam the god,

01/07/2009 08:08:25
lets have another knee jerk reaction to these figures from the government ban alcohol in most forms and what they leave us with you have to go through a rigorous screening process. Just think more people die (or are killed) each day from drink as opposed to being killed by guns.
16

dornoch,

north america 01/07/2009 08:10:30
Price isn't going to stop it. It's part of our culture, we grow up with it and sometime swe can't stop at it just being "social". Kids drqnk when I was young but if they met you they were usually just silly, now they'd probably stomp you. But it's not the easy access to booze that's doing it, it's the mind. Put the price up, restrict it, and people who have to have it will still have it. Baning guns will stop killing... Restricting booze will stop alcohol abuse.... By the way, in the Highlands, and I mean north of Inverness, where is there any treatment? and that you don't have to drive to without a license?
17

,

01/07/2009 08:31:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

Unimpressed one,

01/07/2009 09:12:33
Scotland leading the world - again. People might give more credence to Holyrood if the numpties focused their attention to this real problem rather than mythical scares. Or would that be too difficult?
19

Jams,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 10:19:29
Statistics are nothing more than an instrument you can play any tune you like on. "Alcohol related deaths" a very careful choice of words, That could included someone killed by an alcohol related advertising sign falling on them, or someone knocked down while crossing the road to get to the shop for a bottle of wine (while completely sober).

The actual report has estimated percentages for some of the "partly atributable" conditions and appplied these percentages to the total number of deaths in 2003. In their own words they have "estimated that 2,882 deaths were estimated to have occured from alcohol attributable conditions." That is two estimates in one sentence which begin to sound like "guess" to me.

Don't get me wrong, the real impact of alcohol is serious and needs to be addressed, but sensationalism should be left to the redtop press not used by an organisation like the BMA.
20

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 10:20:43
I remember reading exactly the same arguements as this on the run up to the nazi-state smoking ban. In other words, a load of incoherent nonsense and disjointed propaganda.

Remember they said that the "immediate" effect of the smoking ban would be to save up to 3,000 lives a year in Scotland? Well? How many have been "saved" so far? None. Zilch. Zippo.

Increasing the price of alcohol will similarly have absolutely no effect--other than to raise more cash from those who can least afford to stump it up.
21

Dún Aenghus,

01/07/2009 10:32:40
#3 This is true!
What can one expect of the Scottish people,after 300 years of English rule. Hic! Hic!
22

Itchy,

01/07/2009 10:50:25
" support plans to increase the price of cheap drinks."

Tax and ban - the medical profession's answer to everything and one that politicians eagerly subscribe to.

23

,

01/07/2009 11:01:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Mcsnagpile,

01/07/2009 11:45:36

The problem is that cigarettes and alcohol are boring. People still rationalise that somehow knocking back alcohol makes life less boring. Many problems associated with alcohol have been missed out on the list of diseases. Anxiety, panic attacks, depression.---even the old story of chronic obesity.
I can smell the disinfectant blocks, the wafting aroma of stale beer--hear the babbling fools.
Yes educate the public, but not in things they already know.
Perhaps create better alternatives.
25

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 12:10:11
#23:

If you see the deliberate marginalisation, oppression of and removal of freedoms from significant minority of people for no reason whatsoever other than a group of latter day nazis and selfish bigots think it's right to do so, then I suppose it has been a success.

The smoking ban was justified by so-called "passive smoking". Passive smoking, as we all know, does not exist so there is no valid reason for banning smoking in pubs.

BTW: If anyone wants to claim that passive smoking DOES exist then before you start posting, name six people who have been proven to have died of it. You can't have a cause of death if no-one has died of it---fact.

You mention prohibition. Can you not see that the intention is already there for that? It is lurking in the background. Read between the lines.

The problems we are experiencing now are in the main due to over-zealous enforcement of laws and the treatment of people like idiots. We need to stop those things first, rather than "cracking down" harder. Do the latter and the problems will only get far worse.
26

Distalgesic,

01/07/2009 12:29:10
Data from 2003. Hardly what you would call up to date.
27

,

01/07/2009 12:56:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
28

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 13:12:50
"Passive smoking has been proved may times to make existing conditions worse"

I would say that it has been presumed that "passive smoking" MIGHT have made some conditions worse. Repeating the same presumption with increasing frequency and in an increasingly louder voice does not make it a truth.

There is not a single official record EVER MADE of anyone dieing or being otherwise made ill by passive smoking. None whatsoever. Believe me, I have tried my best to find out. There is not a single death certificate that mentions passive smoking and there is not a single post-mortum report that mentions it either.

I can accept the fact that some people might not like the smell of smoke---which is where tolerance comes in. I can also accept the fact that a very smoky room might be uncomfortable to everyone, smokers and non-smokers included. However the kind of pubs where you would find this before the ban were generally "smokers' pubs" where you got what it said on the tin. If one isn't prepared to put up with smoke, why go to a smokers' pub?

Having said that, segregated areas would allow smokers and non-smokers to co-exist happily. We should be going down the same road that Germany and Spain have already been down. If a bar is smaller than a certain size, the choice of smoking or non-smoking is down to management. For larger bars, they MUST have separate indoor areas.

That sounds fair enough to me. The only ones that have an objection to that are, as I said earlier, neo-nazis and selfish bigots.
29

MRab2,

01/07/2009 13:17:16
#25 It's interesting that when a partial smoking ban was proposed 80% of people were AGAINST a complete ban, it's only when the proposals changed did a majority *magically* start supporting it.

It was also supposed to be good for business. Uh, huh, we know how that's working out AND it would immediately save 3000 lives a year; mortality figures have remained constant in Scotland.
It also caused Scotland's "heart attack miracle" (17% drop after 12 months). A figure that was later shown to be false and now there are MORE heart attacks than there were pre-ban.

Honestly, after the expenses scandal you'd think people would learn; politicians CAN'T BE TRUSTED.

Everything that supports a policy should be treated with a healthy dose of skepticism - including these supposed 2800 deaths.

Last word; if ever increasing restrictions is what constitutes progress, you can stuff progress up yer a***
30

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 13:33:42
#29:

"if ever increasing restrictions is what constitutes progress, you can stuff progress up yer a***"

I'm afraid mate that that is exactly what "progress" means nowadays. I've lost count of the number of arguments and debates I've been involved in regarding the restrictions of the day, and have been winning the upper hand---only to have my opponent start banging on about "progress".

When are these people going to get into their thick, numbskull, rat's maze brains that "progress" is about making things better for all. It is not about making things better for a stupid, bigotted minority whilst restricting the freedoms and rights of the majority.
31

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 14:02:34
Anyway... Back to topic...

"The researchers reanalysed data from 2003 based on new methods of calculating the damage caused by alcohol."

In other words they have found a method of manipulating the figures fro 6 years ago to make them seem a lot worse.

"Health secretary Nicola Sturgeon said: "This research shows alcohol misuse is taking an even higher toll on Scotland's health than previously thought."

Oh come off it Nicola! Try reading between the lines a bit.

Never before has so much rubbish been spoken by so few to so many.
32

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 01/07/2009 14:12:07
"Dr Peter Terry, chairman of the British Medical Association in Scotland, said the nation was "awash with alcohol" and the effects were "crippling" the NHS."

What a load of alarmist rubbish. "Awash with alcohol" indeed. And I suppose that the NHS is being crippled in spite of the fact that smokers and drinkers keep the damn thing going?

"The report also estimated drinking at moderate levels had some benefit in preventing deaths from heart disease. It suggested that 1,493 heart disease deaths may have been prevented in this way..."

What a meaningless statement. How can you POSSIBLY suggest that because someone didn't die of a heart attack, moderate drinking was the reason behind it? How patently ridiculous.

"...but the report warned that even drinking at low levels was a risk factor for other conditions."

Make up your mind. It is safe to drink moderately or not?

"Legislation on price is the only proven way to help change behaviour and end the heavy-drinking culture that is blighting our health service."

PROVEN???? Proven by who? And proven based upon what evidence? How the hell can you prove something if you haven't done it yet? for someone who is supposed to be a doctor, this man isn't capable of rational thought, let alone scientific reasoning. He should be struck off.

Like I said earlier, here we have the anti-smoking propaganda all over again, with the word "alcohol" substituted for "tobacco".
33

english charlie,

01/07/2009 15:19:28
I see that the drinkers are now being persecuted. How long will it be before the Drinking Control groups start saying that alcohol should be highly restricted, because it is more dangerous than tobacco. One measure of alcohol contains over 2,000 more carcinogens than one cigarette, so passive drinking is far more dangerous than passive smoking.
34

Alba Abú,

01/07/2009 15:44:28
#33 True.
However,I dont hear many people calling for the closure of our human abattoirs,where thousands of our citizens are killed every year. Ah! but the destruction of unborn life is "a choice" Even when the baby is kicking and moving in the womb.
Dont smoke! Dont drink! but if you want to destroy unborn life,go ahead,the state will assist you. What a nation of hypocrites we really have become.
Social abortion,the crime against humanity continues.
35

Dún Aenghus,

01/07/2009 18:46:27
34 Alba In most cases its the excessive drinking that leads to the unplanned pregnances,then the simple solution is found. Kill the baby.

Agree, we are a nation of hypocrites.
36

Eve,

Scotland 02/07/2009 16:13:18
Fetus and newborn affected by maternal use of alcohol & Fetal alcohol syndrome DO NOT KILL you, they harm yer unborn child, which is much much worse cause they never chose to have their mum drink alchol. It was just the way it worked out for them.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you support Scotland’s new licensing laws, which come into effect now?
Yes, if they help curb our binge-drinking culture
No, people will still find the money to go boozing
No, these laws treat people like children

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.