Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


US shifts anti-drugs focus to fresh fields

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 June 2009
AFGHANISTAN and the United States appeared to be at loggerheads yesterday after Washington announced a switch in its counter-narcotics strategy.
Richard Holbrooke, the US special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, said at the weekend that the Obama administration would no longer support efforts to eradicate opium poppy plants in Afghanistan. Instead, it is switching to a strategy of
boosting efforts to fight trafficking and promoting alternative crops.

Speaking at the G8 conference in Trieste, Italy, Mr Holbrooke said: "Western policies against the opium crop, the poppy crop, have been a failure.

"They did not result in any damage to the Taleban, but they put farmers out of work and they alienated people and drove people into the arms of the Taleban."

But Afghanistan's counter-narcotics minister insisted yesterday that his country's drug policy was "perfect".

General Khodaidad said that Afghanistan had achieved "a lot of success" with its anti-drug strategy, which relies heavily on manual eradication of poppy fields, along with monetary incentives and public relations campaigns to persuade farmers not to plant poppies.

Afghan counter-narcotics police have for years used tractors or hand tools to plough under or chop down poppy plants – which yield opium, the main ingredient in heroin – but they have often come under attack and dozens have been killed by militants.

Because the country plants so much poppy, the Taleban and other militants are believed to have reaped tens of millions of dollars in yearly profits despite the police efforts.

The Bush administration had put steady pressure on the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, to step up eradication efforts, arguing that defeating the Taleban would require depriving it of drug revenue. But Mr Holbrooke said such eradication of the poppy crops "might destroy some acreage, but it didn't reduce the amount of money the Taleban got by one dollar".

A recent survey by the United Nations revealed the mixed results of the eradication policy. Out of 23 villages where Afghan officials had eradicated poppies in 2008, 11 of them – 48 per cent – still planted a poppy crop for this year.

Gen Khodaidad said the Afghan government was waiting to see details of the new US strategy and that officials would work with their American counterparts on it.

"Whatever programme or strategy would be to the benefit of Afghanistan, we welcome it," he said.

But he later added: "We are happy with our policy … so I'm not seeing any pause or, what do you call it, deficiency, in our strategy. Our strategy's perfect. Our strategy's good."

Afghanistan is the world's leading source of opium, cultivating 93 per cent of the planet's heroin-producing crop.

While opium cultivation dropped 19 per cent last year, it remains a popular crop in the country's southern provinces where the Taleban is strongest. Last year, it earned insurgents an estimated $50 million to $70m (£30m to £42m), says the UN drug office.

According to a recent UN report, opium eradication reached a high in 2003, after the Taleban were pushed from power, with more than 51,900 acres destroyed. In 2008, only 13,500 acres were cut down, compared with 47,000 acres in the previous year.

In a change of strategy by international troops, Nato forces in recent months have begun attacking drug laboratories and opium storage sites in an effort to deprive the Taleban of drug profits.

The new US policy calls for assisting farmers who abandon poppy cultivation.

Mr Holbrooke told G8 ministers that Washington was increasing its funding for agricultural assistance from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars a year, said Franco Frattini, the foreign minister of Italy, the current G8 president.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 June 2009 10:00 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Afghanistan
 
1

Mashimaro,

China 29/06/2009 00:18:07
Good yes, make it more expensive and dangerous, push that price right up. By the way, ever thought about just policing your borders or offering the Afghan farmers what you pay the aussies? Nahhh... guess not eh.
2

,

29/06/2009 05:50:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Obsidian Black,

England 29/06/2009 09:31:26
The two contributors above make an excellent point.

A few years ago there was a worldwide shortage of diamorphine (clinical grade pharmaceutical heroin), the worlds best and most useful painkiller. To produce this we pay a high price for poppy straw grown under high security conditions in Tasmania and then fly it all the way here to be processed into diamorphine, then package it up and fly it all the way to Afghanistan to inject into wounded soldiers and civilians.

There is no practical reason why the UN could not build a pharmaceutical plant under guard at Kandahar airport, train the Afghans to run it and buy poppy straight from the farmers at a fair trade price to produce loads of cheap diamorphine for distribution via the UNHCR.

The problem is there are too many vested interests in the status quo and to move to assisting the Afghans to develop their own pharmaceutical industry would mean undercutting white 'christian' industry to support non-white Moslems and reduce the profits made by the military-industrial complex in fighting another unwinable war in Islam - and that would never do!

The best way to cut the profits from under the Taliban is to compete. Afghanistan will never succumb to western occupation or colonialism, let's learn from the Russians here, the only way forward is to support and develop legitimate industry based on their natural resources; and if that happens to be opium poppy then so be it.

I was in Pakistan when the British were trying to persuade the farmers to grow cabbage and apricots for a fraction of the income they would generate for poppy and it was a doomed initiative.

The other argument against this is that we wouldn't be able to control the trade. But we are not controlling it now! Better that the UN are in control of 40% of opium rather than 2%. So lets cultivate poppy and maintain the supply for legitimate medical use. Giving free diamorphine to developing nation's health-care systems would still be cheaper than
4

Rattlesnake,

04/07/2009 11:23:01
Gotta try something new.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.