Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


UK missed chance to stabilise Iraq and moved too fast to Afghanistan

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 June 2009
BRITAIN missed the opportunity to stabilise Iraq following the invasion of 2003 and was too quick to shift resources to the conflict in Afghanistan, the head of the Army acknowledged yesterday.
General Sir Richard Dannatt, Chief of the General Staff, said the failure of coalition forces to take advantage of the "window of consent" in the immediate aftermath of the invasion had opened the door to the Shia militias.

He said they had not ke
pt enough troops on the ground – particularly as the focus of operations switched to Afghanistan.

His comments, in a keynote address to the Royal United Services Institute think-tank in London, came as Whitehall is gearing up for the government's "lessons learned" inquiry on the Iraq War.

Gen Dannatt said one of the key lessons from the conflict was the need to achieve a "decisive effect" early on.

"In Iraq this meant acting while we had a window of consent to address the security and basic needs of the Iraq people, reconstruction, development and developing the capacity of indigenous security forces," he said.

"Our failure to deliver this through proper investment and a comprehensive approach and our early switch to an economy of force operation in favour of Afghanistan sowed the seeds for the dissatisfaction that followed and the rise of the militias supported so cynically by the Iranians in the south."

He said the coalition had also failed to ensure it had enough troops on the ground, "surging" the numbers when the situation demanded.

"In truth, we failed to maintain the force levels required, either of coalition forces or Iraqi forces, and particularly towards the later end of the campaign, by which time we were already committed to a new operation in Afghanistan."

Gen Dannatt said mistakes had also been made in the recruitment and training of Iraq security forces who were deployed too quickly, before they were ready.

Gen Dannatt said the success of operations in Sierra Leone, and East Timor showed it would be wrong to abandon completely Tony Blair's doctrine of "liberal intervention".

However he stressed future interventions should only be undertaken if they could be properly resourced.

"Not to do so risks repeating the experience of Iraq," he said.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 June 2009 10:31 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Iraq , Afghanistan
 
1

The Col. of Monte Cristo,

24/06/2009 00:44:45
General Doughnut!

We have been assisting the Yanks to secure the Poppy Fields in Afghanistan for seven years now and are beginning to stray into Pakistan...How much longer do you think our troops will be there?

2

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 24/06/2009 09:05:07
The General misses the point. Military strategy is being governed by Brown's need for a headline "pulling troops out of Basra". He has no conception of what's there on the ground. He seeks to minimise cost so troops are at maximum risk with dud guns and poorly armoured vehicles, so saving money for the client state of social security scroungers, illegal immigrants (many from Iraq and Afghanistan) and for handouts to undeserving African countries. Oh and piles and piles of cash that no one has earned yet pumped into the economy to help him save face from his disastrous economic policies.

Look forward to an open inquiry with both Brown and Blair justifying themselves, but won't hold my breath.
3

Prudence,

24/06/2009 10:30:17
My understanding is that it was UN intervention that stabilsed East Timor and Sierra Leone . Was it Tony Blair's doctrine of "liberal intervention", or John Reid in January 2006, that got NATO into southern Afghanistan to form provincial reconstruction teams?
Sir John Chilcot says evidence may be given under an "undertaking" of truthfulness. If there is nothing to hide , whats the problem swearing under oath ?
4

Joe Plaice,

the Nutmeg of Consolation 24/06/2009 11:49:36
The United Kingdom, (boak), missed the window of opportunity of telling Phony Bliar to go and get stuffed when he proposed this phony war. A million people marched but the Stalinist/Marxist UK Gov ignored the proletariat and did it anyway. Such arrogance and evil will be rewarded. The long, slow-burning fires of hell await you Phony Tony!
5

,

25/06/2009 16:07:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Taz,

The Land of the Free 03/07/2009 19:02:10
Re:
UK missed chance to stabilise Iraq and moved too fast to Afghanistan.

ROTFPMSL
7

Bright Spark,

16/07/2009 02:07:46
No point in crying over spilt milk now. The UK should never have been there in the first place.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is Britain right to send more troops to Afghanistan?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.