Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Iceland goes into meltdown as crisis topples government

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 January 2009
ICELAND's coalition government collapsed yesterday under the pressure of the economic crisis that has driven the nation to bankruptcy and political turmoil.
Geir Haarde, the Conservative prime minister, announced the resignation of the cabinet after he was unwilling to hand over the leadership to his coalition partners, the left-wing Social Democratic Alliance party.

The country has been in trouble since October, when its banks collapsed owing six times Iceland's entire economic output, resulting in rising unemployment and daily protests, including the recent stoning of the prime minister's car.

Iceland, once hailed by Alex Salmond, the First Minister, as part of the "arc of prosperity" of independent nations of which Scotland could be a part, had its banks' assets in Britain frozen by Gordon Brown,

The Prime Minister used anti-terrorism legislation to claw back some of the £1 billion owed to British councils, charities and police authorities that had invested funds in Icelandic banks when they promised returns of 10 per cent.

The government of Iceland had responded to the crisis by nationalising the leading banks and negotiating a $10 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund and donor countries in order to stay afloat.

But yesterday the prime minister said he was unwilling to meet demands from his coalition partners in the Social Democratic Alliance party, which insisted on holding the post of prime minister in order to keep the coalition intact.

Mr Haarde, who has been prime minister since 2006, said he would officially inform the country's president that the government had collapsed. He said: "It was an unreasonable demand for the smaller party to demand the premiership over the larger party."

Meanwhile, the country's foreign minister, Ingibjorg Gisladottir, who heads the Social Democrats, is expected to start talks immediately with opposition parties in an attempt to form a new government.

Last night, Lars Christensen, head of emerging market research at Danske Bank, said: "This is not unexpected and at least it is the end of the pain politically.

"I would view it as good news because it should give us more clarity rather than less. Obviously, the left wing is likely to get a very good showing in the election. The likely verdict of the Icelandic people is that they will want the current government well out of the way."

Mr Haarde had already said on Friday he would not seek re-election because he has cancer, and had proposed an early parliamentary election on 9 May.

But he said he wanted to keep running Iceland until the vote.

Polls show both coalition parties trailing the opposition Left-Green party, indicating that a shift in power is likely. It was unclear yesterday if elections would be held in May or earlier, or if a new coalition could be formed under the current mandate, which runs to 2011.

Jubilant protesters honked horns and banged pots and pans outside Iceland's parliament after the news the government had fallen.

The playwright Snorri Hauksson said: "We are very happy and optimistic today. I think the public deserves a celebration but, of course, we realise that there are troubled times ahead and not all our demands have been met."

Over the weekend, Mrs Gisladottir had several meetings with the prime minister to discuss her conditions to keep the coalition alive.

She had called for the resignation of the board of the central bank and its governor, David Oddsson.

Mrs Gisladottir had also demanded to be prime minister until the election, but yesterday she proposed the social affairs minister, Johanna Sigurdardottir, take the job instead.

Mr Haarde insisted that this position had been the final dealbreaker and that he had demanded one of his party members would lead a government.

Under the Icelandic constitution, the president is now charged with finding a new government with sufficient parliamentary backing.


WHAT NEXT

THERE are now three main possibilities for Iceland: a national unity government, a new coalition or a government of the old coalition partners, the Independents and Social Democratic Alliance (SDA).

Prime minister Geir Haarde's Independents have 25 of 63 parliamentary seats. The SDA has 18 seats. The next biggest faction is the Left-Green Party with nine seats. Polls show it is gaining popularity and its leader, Steingrimur Sigfusson, has thrown his hat in the ring as a possible prime minister.

"What is likely is a minority government of the SDA and the Leftist-Greens," said Gunnar Helgi Kristinsson, a professor of political science at the University of Iceland. But the potential hurdles are major. Prof Kristinsson said: "There are quite a few points which the two parties would have to agree on: the EU, the IMF and who should be prime minister."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 January 2009 10:06 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Credit Crunch
 
1

Rob Bennett,

Point Piper Australia 27/01/2009 00:19:59
Not a cool place to be the moment.
2

Dark Lochnagar,

Symington 27/01/2009 01:22:56
Iceland's problems will soon seen miniscule when compared to ours. If you won the lottery and got £10 million and if the Ben Nevis represented our debt you would have ONE EIGHTH OF AN INCH of that height. Did you see the story in the news about how the Icelanders are sending us a container full of knitted jumpers to help the hundreds of pensioners who freeze to death here every winter. And we call them terrorists!
3

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

27/01/2009 02:07:51
Interesting, and absolutely outrageous, that 'anti-terrorism' laws were used against Iceland in this instance. I would have thought that 'anti-terrorism' laws could only be used against terrorists-apparently not. In which case, how are they 'anti-terrorism' laws? Surely then, they're just laws?
4

donald,

glasgow 27/01/2009 03:55:40
Since when did Great Britain cease to be terrorists.
5

democracy,

Scottish Borders 27/01/2009 04:08:43
Anti-terrorism laws is it? You can expect nothing less from the trash that governs UK at present as with all the supporters of this self-serving,duplicitous garbage with their trough seeking snouts everywhere!!

Iceland are no more incompetent than this New Labour Westminster crowd,just wait and see. People who follow politics know that New Labour's contrived party with your Blair and Brown at the helm were never anything other than self-serving con artists.

History will show they were war mongering murderers who also brought the UK to its knees financially with incompetence on a grand scale!!
6

Scotindy,

Los Angeles 27/01/2009 04:15:47
Iceland has just got rid of a conservative politician and the Disunited kingdom is just about to elect a conservative government in england. Scotland on the other hand will be Independent by then and will be goverened by an amalgum of Social Democrats.
The two countries will have something in common,Iceland will be rubbing shoulders with the english when they both meet at the International Monetory Loans Office.
7

Phil C,

27/01/2009 06:27:57
Iceland will recover and regain it's place in the 'arc of prosperity', hopefully with Scotland joining that group. With a population of just over 300,000 Iceland isn'nt exactly a world power but they have a hell of a lot more representation than Scotland do! If they have made mistakes, then they will fix them, no thanks to the UK government's bullying and underhand terrorist tactics.

The incompetent UK government has been morally bankrupt for a while and are fast heading towards economic bankruptcy. It's time for Scotland to get on with it's own affairs.
8

Donnie Murdo,

Western Isles 27/01/2009 08:14:10
For Arc's sake! Silly billies!

Mind you, there must be something in this arc of prosperity as Norway are weathering it fine just now and the Bank of Ireland are underwriting all the Post Office savers cash (which would explian why some post office cash machines I haev seen are owned by the BoI)
9

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 27/01/2009 08:19:36
To all the pro-Unionists who decry the "Arc of Prosperity", I see that no article has made it into this paper (I haven't been bothered to check the rest of the Unionist press) about NORWAY.

Reported yesterday in the real world, was that NORWAY is starting its own stimulus package. Not as big as the UK or US - only about £2.5bn. The reporter on CNBC was, rather enviously reporting that NORWAY would not have to go and borrow or print money. Rather, as an OIL RICH nation, it was going to spent just 5% of its OIL FUND.

#8
Well done Maggie Brown - the UK cannot follow NORWAY's example - because the UK DOES NOT HAVE AN OIL FUND. As soon as the Oil Money is pumped out of the ground it is pi$$ed up against the wall by Westminster. He can't even sell off Gold, because the buffoon has already done that.

WELL DONE MAGGIE BROWN INDEED.

If there are terrorists around here, it's certainly NOT Iceland.
10

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 27/01/2009 08:33:02
The only Oil Fund that the UK hold is the money that this Labour party holds back in order to fight an election. Near an election they will start throwing out pennies in order to buy votes - and many, many Scots will accept the bribe.
11

Boab1,

27/01/2009 09:53:42
#12 As it has always been throughout Scotland's history, unfortunately.

As has been said we can add the UK to that arc of insolvency. To try and belittle others when you're in such a shocking state yourself is ridiculous. Thankfully, the electorate are waking up to Brown's lies.
12

Gerry,

Galway Ireland 27/01/2009 09:57:19
There's a joke doing the rounds here in the Republic.
"What's the difference between Ireland and Iceland"?
"One letter and six months"!
I'm very worried that it's not really a joke.
13

Donnie Murdo,

Western Isles 27/01/2009 10:07:59
14 Gerry

I wouldn't worry, your Bank of Ireland is underwriting the UK's Post Office savers cash.

Can't be all that bad if Eire are propping up the UK to some degree.
14

,

27/01/2009 12:23:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 27/01/2009 14:23:36
Tories out. Nice one!
16

SouthernGent,

27/01/2009 16:55:40
#6
And I see your version of social democrats out there in la la land have done wonders. Why should the rest of the US taxpayers bail out your incompetent state gov't. Time for you left coasties to wake up and get your butt in gear.
17

Andy Mac,

G20 27/01/2009 20:19:59
haven't found anything on this in the Scotsman:

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2484958.0.Scotlands_role_in_electricity_supergrid_highlighted.php
18

Stan Butler,

27/01/2009 20:43:50
#14 Gerry

That's like the 1950s when the Irish would describe their economic situation as desperate but not serious.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.