Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 7th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Scotland On Sunday site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Teresa Hunter: The Bank is taking a big gamble by not lowering rates



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
08 June 2008
NEVER give a sucker an even break, they say, and there were few lucky breaks for most of us last week, with petrol around £1.20 a litre, diesel at £1.30, a decent loaf of bread at more than £1 and cheaper mortgages less likely than Hillary Clinton for President.
The Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee turned a deaf ear to homebuyers when it left interest rates unchanged at 5%. The move brings closer the prospect of a serious house price crash, not to mention recession.

Average house prices fell b
y 2.5% last month across the UK, pushing values down 8% since last September, according to the Halifax. The seventh fall in the past nine months has cut the cost of a typical British home by more than £15,000 to £184,111. The fall now looks unstoppable and it may only be a matter of time before it arrives at the border.

So members of the MPC are taking a big gamble by keeping rates high. The odds are increasing daily that the only lights at the end of the tunnel we are likely to see any time soon will be the headlights of an express train speeding straight at us.

Of course the Bank of England is concerned about inflation, as managing inflation is its entire remit, unlike the Fed, which has a responsibility not to damage the wider economy. But the inflation target is based on an arbitrary index, which might look starkly different if a few items were added or subtracted. Can it be wise to risk everything on an inflexible academic exercise?

From membership of the Exchange Rate Mechanism to the Gold Standard fiasco, the history of the British economy is a case study in the reckless folly of putting interest rates in a strait jacket. Time and again, a narrow remit, insensitive to the needs of the wider economy, has triggered widespread bankruptcies, job losses and a collapse in asset prices.

The level of UK interest rates can have no impact whatsoever on international oil prices or the cost of food at a time of food riots in other countries. All they do is hammer homeowners and homegrown businesses.

Taxes do push up prices though, so why should we be surprised to see inflation picking up in May after an April budget which increased excise duties, not least on cigarettes and alcohol? Inflation will come under pressure again in the autumn when the Government implements its 2p fuel tax rise, and again next year when the much-loathed higher road taxes bite. Meanwhile, mortgage lending has collapsed to record lows of half the peak of last year. Hardly surprising, given the recent price rises.

Some borrowers will now do better to stick with their lender's standard rate when their deal comes to an end. If your lender's SVR is too high, the next question is should you remortgage on a fix or a tracker? Views are split. If the Bank of England has its way, it is hard to see how rates could fall further this year. They may even go up.

But as the economic news deteriorates in the months ahead, as it surely will, many believe their hand will be forced.

If you have a £100,000 loan and a 25% deposit, your cheapest two-year fix will be with Ing Direct, the best five-year with the Co-op and the best two-year tracker with Yorkshire Building Society.

For those with only a 10% deposit, Direct Line has the best two-year fix, HSBC the best five-year deal and Clydesdale Bank the cheapest two-year tracker.

Personally, I look forward to that historic moment when the Chancellor announces he has instructed the Bank of England to abandon the Consumer Price Index as we know it. Let's hope he doesn't leave it as long as Lamont did to ditch the ERM.

Home truths

ON MAY 11, this column berated the Council of Mortgage Lenders for not producing Scottish-specific housing information in "Lies, damn lies and housing market statistics". So I was delighted when last week the mortgage trade body produced a raft of new data revealing, for example, that the average Scottish first-time buyer is aged 28, compared with 29 across the UK, earns £28,611 compared with £35,029, and borrows £83,240 compared with the British average of £116,820.

The rest of us typically move again when we are 37, borrow £112,829 and earn £41,829. In all, the average Scottish mortgage is £99,000. This compares with the typical 38-year-old mover across the whole of the UK, who borrows £134,802 and earns £45,667.

All we need now are Scottish arrears and repossession numbers; but, as I always say, one step at a time.



The full article contains 820 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 June 2008 7:15 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
  • Related Topics: SOS Business Columnists
 
1

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 08/06/2008 10:00:10
"... the inflation target is based on an arbitrary index, which might look starkly different if a few items were added or subtracted."

Indeed; and if it had taken account of year after year of double-digit house price inflation then perhaps we wouldn't have been seeing the current problems in the housing market. It seems that it's OK to for interest rates to take no account of house prices when they're on the way up, but not when they're on the way down.
2

ccc,

08/06/2008 11:34:07
Theresa a few points:


"closer the prospect of a serious house price crash"

A serious house price crash is a good thing. I am not even going to bother to explain why. It should be self evident.

"by keeping rates high"

5% is historically VERY LOW for interest rates. Go and google for the details.

What hope is there when a newspaper 'expert' is giving advice on interest rates without even bothering to look up the historical data......

5% is LOW. If you don't know that then you should give up your advice. Because it is very poor. (In this respect anyway)

Also it doesn't matter what the BoE is doing. The lenders are setting rates at their own levels. The BoE bringing down rates will do nothing for homeowners.

It is clear all you care about is homeowners. They have been bleating for the last 10 years about how much 'Their house was worth'.

If they can't take the bad times with the good they don't deserve to have a house.

Good day.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.